Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Doc said:

Why didn't they kick the FG?

There was time to take a shot at the EZ.  If it didn't work, they would have kicked the FG

Posted
Just now, nkreed said:

There is no CLEAR evidence that his hand wasn't under the ball!

 

 

And that's the issue it was ruled a TD on the field and no proof to overturn that. 

 

Also the ball can move if they still have possession it's that rule for that Tampa bay WR Bert Emmanuel that they lost a playoff game because of it 

 

but they still go ahead and give it to the pats 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

This is the most over-officiated crap league in the world.  Why let the talent of the athletes determine the winner of the game, when you can rely on a pencil-necked 70 year old geek with a tablet to figure out the winner.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

He caught it, brought it into his body, knee hit, then extended the ball over the goal line.  Definite football move makes it a catch.  100%.

 

only explanation is the refs rigged it for the Pats.  Why does the NFL cheat for the pats I will never understand!!!!

 

It's SO  OBVIOUS how to beat the pats, I say it every time, tight man coverage and double gronk when he is flexed out.  It's so easy. 

Posted

The problem with playing NE is you have to build a minimum 14 point lead toward the end of the game to have a shot at winning

Posted

That's really one of the worst calls ever. Because if you watch the replay the only reason he is able to reach out to try to make it to the endzone is because he has total possession. He brings it IN before he thrusts it out. That is indisputable proof he has possession of the ball. So it's a TD. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

You guys aren't thinking straight about this.

 

He was going to the ground as part of the process of making the catch.  He dives for it-- he HAS to maintain possession throughout.  His hand is under the ball, but it moves and touches the ground slightly-- the ground has officially helped him control the ball, which invalidates the catch.

 

It was the right call.  Painful, but the right call.

Posted

What the actual !@#$?!

 

I just got knocked out of the fantasy playoffs because I lost the TD and had it turn into an INT. 

 

!@#$ the Pats. !@#$ Gronk. 

 

This just ruined my season in 5 seconds 

Posted

Well the Division title is gone on that BS Pats win.

1 minute ago, Avisan said:

You guys aren't thinking straight about this.

 

He was going to the ground as part of the process of making the catch.  He dives for it-- he HAS to maintain possession throughout.  His hand is under the ball, but it moves and touches the ground slightly-- the ground has officially helped him control the ball, which invalidates the catch.

 

It was the right call.  Painful, but the right call.

BS call man. full possession was there when the ball broke the plain. As soon as the ball broke the plain with possession it was a TD.

×
×
  • Create New...