Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 12/12/2017 at 4:50 PM, SaviorPeterman said:

For those that aren't sheep and are paying close attention, I hope you understand what the elites and liberals are doing here pushing this BS 'Sexual Harassment' narrative to the forefront in recent weeks.

 

Obviously the Russia collusion story is going nowhere despite the recent arrests and charges against Trump campaign members (the charges have nothing to do with Trump or his campaign BTW) so this was 'Plan B' all along. And liberals have no problem sacrificing their own (i.e. Weinstein, Al Franken, etc) to set the stage for 2020 when they run another female candidate against Trump and push the gender card to the forefront again even though they failed miserably with Crooked Hillary. Same reason all the BS sexual accusations against Trump are magically in the news again and you see his 'victims' sob stories as if they are 'new' allegations.

 

It's pretty sad the lengths Democrats (and some Republicans) are going to go to try and stop this guy because he's not one of them and never will be. And even when Trump wins by a larger margin in 2020 they'll still find new ways to waste taxpayer money and continue their futile efforts. These are truly sick people folks.

Expand  

 

Cool conspiracy theory. 

Posted (edited)
  On 12/12/2017 at 4:53 PM, HappyDays said:

 

I'm guessing in your experience this happens all the time. Maybe reflect on that.

Expand  

Anyone who has been on enough dates with women has it happen.  The more successful you are with women, the more it will happen.  It's like a guy who gets one sale after talking to 5 people versus a guy who gets 10 sales after talking to 100...the guy with the most sales gets the most rejections...dating no different than sales, its a numbers game.  

 

Anyone who is claiming to have never gotten rejected by a woman hasn't done much of anything worth noting with women in their life.

 

Edited by matter2003
Posted
  On 12/12/2017 at 4:50 PM, matter2003 said:

 

Yeah, I don't doubt that...lawyers are definitely pretty tightly wound...although I can't count the number of ones I've seen snorting coke at an after party tho...

Expand  

 

So we get another of your generalisations about a whole profession..... teachers are freaky and lawyers are tightly wound.  Got you.  

 

As for snorting at an after party.  I would never have done it myself..... but I again differentiate between what is appropriate behaviour in the office and appropriate behaviour outside work.  

Posted (edited)
  On 12/12/2017 at 4:54 PM, jrober38 said:

 

Cool conspiracy theory. 

Expand  

 

Actually, there is merritt to that. The liberal media is exhausting all options possible, it's quite transparent. Don't be sheeple for either side.

Edited by T-Bomb
Spelling
Posted
  On 12/12/2017 at 4:43 PM, billsfan1959 said:

Such sweeping generalizations. Please be more specific as to what social institutions run afoul of normal human behavior and in what way? I am certainly willing to have a conversation. I am not trying to impose my viewpoint, merely expressing it - with no more aggressiveness that you show in yours.

Expand  

This is certainly a drastic shift from page seven of the discussion where you declared "if we really have to define what is appropriate or inappropriate, then I don't know what else to say.... ", and more recently informed me that "the discussion isn't about what constitutes normal human behavior, that's what you want it to be about", where you sought to impose your own views by fiat rather than discuss them.

 

If you want to start over, I'm fine with that.

 

Let's start with a list of behaviors, obviously not comprehensive, and where they fall on the scale of acceptability.

Posted
  On 12/12/2017 at 4:55 PM, GunnerBill said:

 

So we get another of your generalisations about a whole profession..... teachers are freaky and lawyers are tightly wound.  Got you.  

 

As for snorting at an after party.  I would never have done it myself..... but I again differentiate between what is appropriate behaviour in the office and appropriate behaviour outside work.  

Expand  

How many people does it have to be before its not considered a generalization?

Posted
  On 12/12/2017 at 4:54 PM, matter2003 said:

Anyone who has been on enough dates with women has it happen.  The more successful you are with women, the more it will happen.  It's like a guy who gets one sale after talking to 5 people versus a guy who gets 10 sales after talking to 100...the guy with the most sales gets the most rejections...dating no different than sales is a numbers game

 

Expand  

 

Making up an excuse to not go on a date with a guy means a woman is willing to lie about sexual harassment for money. I think I've had enough internet for one day.

Posted (edited)
  On 12/12/2017 at 4:57 PM, HappyDays said:

 

Making up an excuse to not go on a date with a guy means a woman is willing to lie about sexual harassment for money. I think I've had enough internet for one day.

Expand  

 

Not only willing, I'd say it is far more likely.

 

Or don't you believe that money is something women are attracted to?  Must be love these 25 year old models are dating these 80 year old guys...they love the wrinkles...

Edited by matter2003
Posted
  On 12/12/2017 at 4:57 PM, matter2003 said:

How many people does it have to be before its not considered a generalization?

Expand  

 

Haha.  Are you really asking that?  Given that teachers and lawyers probably number the hundreds of thousands just in America I would suggest it needs to be more than the less than 1% I think you have personal experience of.  

Posted
  On 12/12/2017 at 1:02 PM, BuffaloBill said:

I wonder how long it is before the parade of high profile guys accused of sexual harassment finally grinds to a halt.  It seems like now there are two or three every week.

 

 

You are seriously off here if the allegations against the men are proven true.

Expand  

Innocent until proven guilty. Until then, I'll reserve judgement.  And after that point I'll continue my life like I am now.  Has no bearing on me whatsoever.

Posted

Gone are the days of hitting them over the head with your club and dragging them back to your cave to live happily ever after..

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 12/12/2017 at 4:55 PM, GunnerBill said:

 

So we get another of your generalisations about a whole profession..... teachers are freaky and lawyers are tightly wound.  Got you.  

 

As for snorting at an after party.  I would never have done it myself..... but I again differentiate between what is appropriate behaviour in the office and appropriate behaviour outside work.  

Expand  

So far from matter2003's posts, I've gathered that teachers are freaks who want to have sex with anyone in a public restroom at Bills' games, lawyers are wound tight and like to snort cocaine, he's looking for that woman who will be on her knees in a bathroom stall (he seems to have a thing for public restrooms) within five minutes of hitting on her, and, here's the real shocker: women lie in order to not go out with him. Did I miss anything?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 12/12/2017 at 4:52 PM, GunnerBill said:

 

But we are talking about when they do violate someone's rights..... like sticking a hand down their trousers to check if they are wearing underwear.....  

Expand  

In a vacuum, of course that wouldn't be acceptable behavior.

 

But we aren't in a vacuum.  There are many contexts in which the historical interactions of the people involved could make that exact same interaction completely reasonable.

Posted (edited)
  On 12/12/2017 at 5:00 PM, billsfan1959 said:

So far from matter2003's posts, I've gathered that teachers are freaks who want to have sex with anyone in a public restroom at Bills' games, lawyers are wound tight and like to snort cocaine, he's looking for that woman who will be on her knees in a bathroom stall (he seems to have a thing for public restrooms) within five minutes of hitting on her, and, here's the real shocker: women lie in order to not go out with him. Did I miss anything?

Expand  

 

They've lied to you to, you just probably believed them in your naivety.

Edited by matter2003
Posted
  On 12/12/2017 at 5:00 PM, billsfan1959 said:

So far from matter2003's posts, I've gathered that teachers are freaks who want to have sex with anyone in a public restroom at Bills' games, lawyers are wound tight and like to snort cocaine, he's looking for that woman who will be on her knees in a bathroom stall (he seems to have a thing for public restrooms) within five minutes of hitting on her, and, here's the real shocker: women lie in order to not go out with him. Did I miss anything?

Expand  

 

I think that is a reasonable synopsis.  

Posted

A lot of cute comments about not being "able to look at girls" and "what's next.." BS here.  

 

It's really simple, don't hump if not asked.  Don't show your dong if not asked.  Don't try and solicit sex with a co-worker if she's not interested.    

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 12/12/2017 at 4:57 PM, TakeYouToTasker said:

This is certainly a drastic shift from page seven of the discussion where you declared "if we really have to define what is appropriate or inappropriate, then I don't know what else to say.... ", and more recently informed me that "the discussion isn't about what constitutes normal human behavior, that's what you want it to be about", where you sought to impose your own views by fiat rather than discuss them.

 

If you want to start over, I'm fine with that.

 

Let's start with a list of behaviors, obviously not comprehensive, and where they fall on the scale of acceptability.

Expand  

Not really a shift at all. I happen to believe that what constitutes acceptable or appropriate behavior in any given situation should come pretty easily to you - and we shouldn't have to have a comprehensive list to go by. If you need a list, then, by all means, develop one and pin it to your shirt.

×
×
  • Create New...