Jump to content

Sex Allegations Against Trump


Congressional Inquiry, Sex Allegations Against Donald Trump  

17 members have voted

  1. 1. Should there be a Congressional inquiry about Trump's sex allegations?

  2. 2. Should Trump resign if found out that these allegations are true?



Recommended Posts

On 12/11/2017 at 12:43 PM, ExiledInIllinois said:

Should there be a Congressional inquiry?

 

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-42313637

 

16 woman all making false claims?  

 

Franken resigned over this (with proof), should Trump?

 

Will The Donald contain more Teflon than Slick Willy?

 

Are the truly powerful really immune to all this?

 

Best part of all this?  I can't wait to see the expressions Sarah Huckabee makes!  She's a beast up there with the expressions! :lol:

 

Sarah-Huckabee-Sanders-1-1280x720.jpg

 

Screen-Shot-2017-05-10-at-11.23.39-AM.pn

 

Don't piss me off, I was never groped:

 

104686336-GettyImages-841296338-sarah-hu

PLEASE take her too. 

Trump took to Twitter Wednesday morning and said that he had been right all along even though he threw the weight of the Oval Office behind an alleged child predator.

“The reason I originally endorsed Luther Strange (and his numbers went up mightily), is that I said Roy Moore will not be able to win the General Election. I was right!” he posted.

 

image.png.807cd13fc59c3bda4692337d8c88de16.png

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our disgusting  president: 

 

“Lightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Charles E. Schumer and someone who would come to my office 'begging' for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump,” the president wrote. “Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!”

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

A president who would all but call Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand a whore is not fit to clean the toilets in the Barack Obama Presidential Library or to shine the shoes of George W. Bush.  

That's the USATodays editorial! 

 

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/12/12/trump-lows-ever-hit-rock-bottom-editorials-debates/945947001/

 

Oh ya, "THE media" 

 

Brainwashed right wing 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As your Poll Admin... I wanna know how /dev voted twice on the first question:  "Congressional inquiry."

 

Crooked /dev!  Lock him up!

 

Was it some fancy IT Guy stuff or did I drop the ball making the poll (you don't have to answer that :D)?

 

Geesh, I am letting these rubes run all over me! 

 

Did he have help from the Rooskies?  Did he vote in PA too?  So many questions!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

As your Poll Admin... I wanna know how /dev voted twice on the first question:  "Congressional inquiry."

 

Crooked /dev!  Lock him up!

 

Was it some fancy IT Guy stuff or did I drop the ball making the poll (you don't have to answer that :D)?

 

Geesh, I am letting these rubes run all over me! 

 

Did he have help from the Rooskies?  Did he vote in PA too?  So many questions!

He had an Asian girl vote for him :) 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

Trump 2020. Get ready. Asshats

 

If the election were held now he would lose by a landslide. I don't even think he will survive 1 term.

 

The pendulum will swing the other way in 2018 and 2020. 

 

I just hope  bipartisan  politicians who are not bought and paid for by special interests get elected.  jmo   

 

Edited by ALF
spelling error
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

That's the USATodays editorial! 

 

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/12/12/trump-lows-ever-hit-rock-bottom-editorials-debates/945947001/

 

Oh ya, "THE media" 

 

Brainwashed right wing 

He's the perfect internet troll!

 

The Depression/War had FDR & his Fireside Chats, The Deplorables had Charles Coughlin*.  Today we have "Trump the Troll."

 

Back in 1930s people thought the same way as these Deplorables... They just didnt have the technological means to overcome basic radio (get the deplorable message to the deplorables on Main street), especially after the gov't carefully controlled (FCC) radio information from going off the rails.  There was Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh, Father Coughlin (Canadian too boot)... Tech during the time kept them from taking the basket of Deplorables off the rails.

 

I am not promoting lack of information, just control of dangerous demagoguery.  We elected a demagogue.  One our Founders warned us about and feared the masses would gravitate too.

 

Guess what... They have the means now and we elected that Father Coughlin in Trump.  Trump, our home grown Deplorable "pride and joy."

 

We can't force Trump off the "air waves" now

 

*"Commonly known as Father Coughlin, he was one of the first political leaders to use radio to reach a mass audience, as up to thirty million listeners tuned to his weekly broadcasts during the 1930s. He was forced off the air in 1939."

Edited by ExiledInIllinois
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ALF said:

 

If the election were held now he would loose by a landslide. I don't even think he will survive 1 term.

 

The pendulum will swing the other way in 2018 and 2020. 

 

I just hope  bipartisan  politicians who are not bought and paid for by special interests get elected.  jmo   

 

That sounds great.  But who the bloody hell would beat him In a landslide. 

 

Schumer is not going to sit well nationally.  Whoever else... Nah

 

The only ones who lose in a landslide are Americans. 

 

The Democrats have NO ONE poised to beat him in 2020. They were all in with Bernie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Boyst62 said:

That sounds great.  But who the bloody hell would beat him In a landslide. 

 

Schumer is not going to sit well nationally.  Whoever else... Nah

 

The only ones who lose in a landslide are Americans. 

 

The Democrats have NO ONE poised to beat him in 2020. They were all in with Bernie

 

I still   believe in Kasich and Jeb in a primary , maybe Kirsten will rally the women's vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ALF said:

 

I still   believe in Kasich and Jeb in a primary , maybe Kirsten will rally the women's vote.

Kasich is who i voted for in the primary.  

 

In primary voting I usually troll the Democratic party like Hillary in 08

 

Kirsten won't be able to do anything. If Clinton cannot get anywhere on a woman's vote than no woman will.   The strongest ticket is Schumer/Booker.

The experienced polished politician with a young buck firestarting VP could capture the Democratic population.

Booker would be willing to get ugly after Trump and would get away with running his mouth like he does now because 1) minority 2) media bias 3) he's just a VP. Schumer is more than able to walk back anything he says after Booker gets the bite.

 

The Democrats in no way could have a woman as VP. To serve under a man would not inspire women enough to change them.

 

Schumer/Booker would be able to run a strong offensive campaign.

 

If elected they'd get tore apart by the Senate, though.  Schumer has alienated every one of his colleagues and no one truly respects Booker.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

Trump 2020. Get ready. Asshats

thats one of the funniest things you ever posted 

 

 

17 minutes ago, ALF said:

 

I still   believe in Kasich and Jeb in a primary , maybe Kirsten will rally the women's vote.

Thats who I would vote for if it came to it...   Jeb ... meh 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

That sounds great.  But who the bloody hell would beat him In a landslide. 

 

Schumer is not going to sit well nationally.  Whoever else... Nah

 

The only ones who lose in a landslide are Americans. 

 

The Democrats have NO ONE poised to beat him in 2020. They were all in with Bernie

 

Pretty much anyone would beat him. His approval rating is historically low. He's gained zero votes since the election and realistically he has probably lost millions of people who took a chance on him only to be extremely disappointed. 

 

If an election were held today, against pretty much any Democratic Senator, he'd lose in a landslide. It would be a massacre given that 57% of voters disapprove of the job he's doing. 

Edited by jrober38
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The election will be decided by the shape of the economy at the time. That's always the case. No wonder the dems are fighting tax cuts so much. They know if the economy is going good then they will again be losers on a national scale. So it is important to the dems that they somehow tank the economy. Party over Country, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

The election will be decided by the shape of the economy at the time. That's always the case. No wonder the dems are fighting tax cuts so much. They know if the economy is going good then they will again be losers on a national scale. So it is important to the dems that they somehow tank the economy. Party over Country, right?

 

This would usually be the case, but the rules of how things work don't apply to Trump. 

 

Too many people hate him. Those people are going to go out in droves next time to get whoever he's running against elected. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...