Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 minutes ago, FearLess Price said:

 

Sure maybe instead of 5 ints he can throw 3 ints and still knock us out of the playoffs 

:lol::lol:

Maybe instead of 65 yards and 3 points, Tryod will throw for 70  and score 6 points and we will still be knocked out of the playoffs...two can play that game.  I actually find it funny that Peterman had a better game through 2 and a half quarters in a foot of snow and only on 10 passes than Tyrod did in perfect conditions the week before and against the Saints haha. I'd rather see if Peterman can learn from his mistakes.  His pass to Benjamin down the sideline was a pass Tyrod has never even attempted or maybe he has attempted it but just sailed an uncatchable ball out of bounds. I'd rather see Peterman play than another 3 point performance by a Tyrod led offense...

17 minutes ago, FearLess Price said:

Weve had this convo a million times shady. Theyre both not the answer for buffalo the way the team and scheme os built but Ill take Tyrods random awesome highlight plays over petermens picks every single time.

You do know 1 performance doesn't define a QB right?  If so, a lot of rookie QBs wouldn't even be given a second start.  Peyton Manning had 28 INTs in his rookie season...

 

We've seen Tyrod over the course of 2 and a half seasons, we know what he can do...I'd like to see the rookie play.  He actually had a good game in the snowy conditions yesterday...with ZERO INTs.  He isn't going to throw an INT every game...give him a chance

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, Real McCoy said:

Canton here comes TT with his 115 yards in a half of football.. You should be embarrassed to act like 115 yards in a half is some great success story or accomplishment. He had 1 good drive the entire half, 1

Go ahead pile on the 2 late garbage time TD's as well. 

 

If you read my post the Dr. Jekyll of TT is why he sucks as a QB. This game proves exactly what I'm saying with his total disappearing act in entire 2nd and 3rd quarter.

 

Since your such a "stats guy" Please explain away how 1 drive in 3 quarters of football is acceptable?

 

 

Capture.JPG

 

 

First, lets be honest here : You said Taylor accumulated all his numbers in fourth quarter garbage time. Wrong. You said that Taylor played bad. Wrong. No amount of flailing around is going to change the fact you screwed up. I'm curious; did you even watch the game? Remember - perhaps - a Nick O'Leary fumble which killed a drive? Remember - perhaps - a Jordan Matthews fumble which killed a drive? Remember - perhaps - eleven penalties for 99 yards? An o-line with all the steadfastness of wet toilet paper? Taylor repeatedly swamped by the Jet's rush as soon as he set his feet to throw? 

 

If you need help remembering the game - as you obviously do - why not go back and read any next day account? Not a one will support your opinion of Taylor's performance. Most said he was about the only Bill who showed up to play.

Edited by grb
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, dneveu said:

 

5 picks. in a half.

 

Why do you need to see more?

One bad half of football is enough to get you tossed out of the league without a second chance to develop and prove yourself? Would hate to play any sport for you. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Buffalo30 said:

Maybe instead of 65 yards and 3 points, Tryod will throw for 70  and score 6 points and we will still be knocked out of the playoffs...two can play that game.  I actually find it funny that Peterman had a better game through 2 and a half quarters in a foot of snow and only on 10 passes than Tyrod did in perfect conditions the week before and against the Saints haha. I'd rather see if Peterman can learn from his mistakes.  His pass to Benjamin down the sideline was a pass Tyrod has never even attempted or maybe he has attempted it but just sailed an uncatchable ball out of bounds. I'd rather see Peterman play than another 3 point performance by a Tyrod led offense...

 

 

The saints are a much better team. Foot of snow or not indy is the worst passing defense in the league so ur argument is meh. There is no evidence supporting Tyrod not being able to score vs the phins. Hes 2-2 vs the phins with one of his best games coming in a loss. NP cant wash Tyrods jockstrap. Thats why the whole country laughed at mcdumb@ss for making the switch while still in playoff contention.  You know why kc are perrenial playoff teams and afc contenders? Cuz they dont make stupid moves like the one ur suggesting. 

Posted
1 minute ago, FearLess Price said:

 

 

The saints are a much better team. Foot of snow or not indy is the worst passing defense in the league so ur argument is meh. There is no evidence supporting Tyrod not being able to score vs the phins. Hes 2-2 vs the phins with one of his best games coming in a loss. NP cant wash Tyrods jockstrap. Thats why the whole country laughed at mcdumb@ss for making the switch while still in playoff contention.  You know why kc are perrenial playoff teams and afc contenders? Cuz they dont make stupid moves like the one ur suggesting. 

There is evidence however of tyrod not being able to score or even move the ball against most teams he has faced this season. Probably why Mcdermott* (fixed it for you), and I imagine the coordinators, were ready to see what anyone else could possibly do. Even a 5th round rookie. Thats how bad Tyrod has been at times this season.

Posted
3 hours ago, CircleTheWagons99 said:

you cant define someone, especially a rookie,  after one game.  3 and out has been around for 7 years and has started for 3 of those.  The NO game is a perfect example of what happens with 3 and out when you take the running game away and "Force the QB to be a QB"

Aside from the fact that it makes up about 1/3rd of his NFL playing time, I agree that is unreasonable to say that about a rookie's first start, I merely was pointing out your buddy's hyperbolic take on Taylor.

Posted
33 minutes ago, FearLess Price said:

 

I coulda sworn there were 11 players on the field on offense not just one.  I gess tyrod fumbled those balls too right? 

Very true JM and I agree that the O-line looked shaky. The Jets rushed the crap out of him on purpose and played to shutdown McCoy. It's not a very hard D gameplan or blueprint anymore to stop TT's game in it's track. To sit here and say he played well is pretty absurd when he did all but squat except 1 drive in 3QTS, fumbled twice and took 7 sacks.

21 minutes ago, grb said:

 

 

First, lets be honest here : You said Taylor accumulated all his numbers in fourth quarter garbage time. Wrong. You said that Taylor played bad. Wrong. No amount of flailing around is going to change the fact you screwed up. I'm curious; did you even watch the game? Remember - perhaps - a Nick O'Leary fumble which killed a drive? Remember - perhaps - a Jordan Matthews fumble which killed a drive? Remember - perhaps - eleven penalties for 99 yards? An o-line with all the steadfastness of wet toilet paper? Taylor repeatedly swamped by the Jet's rush as soon as he set his feet to throw? 

 

If you need help remembering the game - as you obviously do - why not go back and read any next day account? Not a one will support your opinion of Taylor's performance. Most said he was about the only Bill who showed up to play.

Dr, Jekyll

Posted
1 minute ago, DocLawless said:

There is evidence however of tyrod not being able to score or even move the ball against most teams he has faced this season. Probably why Mcdermott* (fixed it for you), and I imagine the coordinators, were ready to see what anyone else could possibly do. Even a 5th round rookie. Thats how bad Tyrod has been at times this season.

 

No.  If Tyrod and the 5th round rook cant score then whats the common factor there? Dennison. Wake up mcfly. We were top 10 in scoring for 2 years before McEgo and Dennidummy got here to screw up the offense. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Real McCoy said:

Very true JM and I agree that the O-line looked shaky. The Jets rushed the crap out of him on purpose and played to shutdown McCoy. It's not a very hard D gameplan or blueprint anymore to stop TT's game in it's track. To sit here and say he played well is pretty absurd when he did all but squat except 1 drive in 3QTS, fumbled twice and took 7 sacks.

Dr, Jekyll

 

They had no respect for our WRs beating the outside.  That is also relative. Tyrod looked like the only player trying that day. Hes not good enuff to wi without a run game and slow wrs with no separation and no hands and a wet toilet paper o line. There are plenty games Tyrod dropped the ball but that game wasnt it.

Posted
8 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

Well, TBH to many of the faithful it did.  

To be fair, it may very well be what he is remembered for in the NFL. 

Posted
Just now, FearLess Price said:

 

They had no respect for our WRs beating the outside.  That is also relative. Tyrod looked like the only player trying that day. Hes not good enuff to wi without a run game and slow wrs with no separation and no hands and a wet toilet paper o line. There are plenty games Tyrod dropped the ball but that game wasnt it.

I honestly never went back and reviewed the all 22 on this game. When 7-8 d-men are coming at you someone is 1 on 1 constantly. A QB has to take the snap and fire the ball almost immediately to the 1:1 coverage. Eventually, if successful enough the D will back the hell up and your running game will open up again. As a QB he has to recognize this and understand this. Holding the ball and running around like a fool does almost nothing but waste time or leads to 7 sacks. 

Posted
Just now, Real McCoy said:

I honestly never went back and reviewed the all 22 on this game. When 7-8 d-men are coming at you someone is 1 on 1 constantly. A QB has to take the snap and fire the ball almost immediately to the 1:1 coverage. Eventually, if successful enough the D will back the hell up and your running game will open up again. As a QB he has to recognize this and understand this. Holding the ball and running around like a fool does almost nothing but waste time or leads to 7 sacks. 

 

You might not want to look at it. Its gonna be depressing to see our wrs during that time of the season couldnt beat simple man coverage and get seperation by the time the rush got home.

Posted
9 minutes ago, FearLess Price said:

 

They had no respect for our WRs beating the outside.  That is also relative. Tyrod looked like the only player trying that day. Hes not good enuff to wi without a run game and slow wrs with no separation and no hands and a wet toilet paper o line. There are plenty games Tyrod dropped the ball but that game wasnt it.

was that the game where romo was saying..."hey ,you got man coverage, you gotta take those shots!"

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
Just now, billsredneck1 said:

was that the game where romo was saying..."hey ,you got man coverage, you gotta take those shots!"

 

Yes. The one were romo was wondering why tt wasnt throwing 50/50 balls to see if our wrs could make a play. Romo obviously hadnt seen our wrs in action when the ball hits their hands at that point.  Lol regardless who was throwing it tt or np.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Tenhigh said:

To be fair, it may very well be what he is remembered for in the NFL. 

From disaster to success story?

 

I like it!!!!!

9 minutes ago, FearLess Price said:

 

Banned by snowflakes bac from the dead ya bish. Lol

 

You admit to being a banned poster?

 

Is that allowed?

×
×
  • Create New...