Why wasn't the hit on Peterman questioned???

[Punt75]

It was obviously helmet to helmet - the video shows that.  The announcer said that a QB that dives head first is to be treated like any other running back or receiver - what the hell does that mean in regards to helmet to helmet hits???  It was clear the Bills on the field were upset with a lot of pushing and shoving after the play.  The tackler went low to the head when Peterman was on the ground (snow).

 

Why was it basically ignored????????

 

[PABillsfan23]

Once at QB dives head first all the rules protecting him are out the window.   He becomes a running back 

[MAJBobby]

He was a RB by going Head First and that call isnt called against RBs 

 

 

[Mrbojanglezs]

Because he is a nobody backup. Refs don't care about anyone other than Brady

[TallskiWallski83]

It was questioned. By every bills fan watching. "WTF WERE YOU THINKING PETERMAN?!!?!?!??"

[Dadonkadonk]

Perfectly legal play.  He dove head first. Defender hit him at the same time he was hitting the ground.  Love the enthusiasm but an extra 4 inches at that time of the game is not worth it.  

[klos63]

27 minutes ago, Mrbojanglezs said:

Because he is a nobody backup. Refs don't care about anyone other than Brady

want a tissue?

[Jerome007]

At first I was indeed pissed at the COlts player. Probably that because of the weather there were very little hard shots so it seemed "inappropriate" LOL But yeah, this was on Peterman. Tough way to learn! And he was looking decent out there.

[Buffalo Boy]

51 minutes ago, Mrbojanglezs said:

Because he is a nobody backup. Refs don't care about anyone other than Brady

Beat me to it!!!

[Hawaii50]

I seriously wonder if the refs could see the hit on Peterman.  Plus they didn't want to throw any flags to prolong game.