Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

They should put Webb in there on a few drives. It will keep the D off balance. Peterman needs premium protection or it will be a repeat of SD. Most importantly, Dennison needs to think on his feet and play an intelligent chess game vs the Colts. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I hope as soon as I wake up tomorrow, one of these talking heads comes on ESPN and says Tyrod is out. That would really turn up the interest for this game IMO. At the end of the day all I care about is a Bills win, but if Tyrod can’t run..we are probably going to lose. I’d rather see the kid who is healthy and can throw it. Not a hampered Tyrod.

Posted
2 hours ago, John from Hemet said:

Without it being announced I already figured Peterman was going to be starting

 

I know the first start for the rook was horrid......but I think he is way better then that

I think most feel that way.  That game unraveled fast after the Dimarco tip drill.

 

A lot of good qb’s had terrible outings their first year.  I’d like to see what he could do against a team like the colts.

Posted (edited)

So we still haven't established if their is any truth to this post. Just a poster taking a shot  in the dark? 

Edited by Steptide
Posted
2 minutes ago, Steptide said:

So we still haven't established if their is any truth to this post. Just a poster taking a shot  in the dark? 

 

No, I'm assuming Sean McDermott told him.

  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
18 hours ago, HappyDays said:

 

After the Saints game he declared Tyrod the starter. And he said "when healthy," seems to me like he's setting up Peterman to start and if he craps the bed again he can go back to Tyrod the next week. But if Peterman plays well enough I'd expect him to start the rest of the way.

 

So... this is not the poster I was thinking it was.

 

FWIW the poster I'm  thinking of is on another message board and yesterday made this exact same statement that Peterman would be starting. He has been right about a whole lot of things lately and I know he knows someone.

 

However, today he retracted that statement and said that now "if Taylor can take a snap, he plays."

 

So, who knows? 0:)

Posted
6 hours ago, buffalobloodfloridahome said:

The biggest thing I noticed about Peterman is what can make or break his career. He is always trying to make a play and he needs to learn to take the sack sometimes and understand pocket presence. If he can figure those two things out he has shown pretty good ball placement accuracy (when not getting crushed) and the ability to throw open receivers as well as throw before their break. He's no longer at Pitt anymore and taking a sack isn't the end of the world. The part of pocket presence is knowing whether he has time to get the ball out before he's hit and not while he's being hit. 

This game if he  starts will give him the best opportunity to get more comfortable in the pocket and against a depleted secondary we have very strong matchups with our wide receivers as well. This is more of a training wheels game for him. If Tyrod starts which would make no sense to me at this point him being injured and we are currently the 8th seed which means we need to win out or have other teams fall back to have a chance. Because I'm a Bills fan I want to win and I want to see Peterman show that he isn't just the butt of all jokes in the NFL but, even if he plays great it doesn't mean much because of the inferior opponent. BTW this inferior opponent we speak of could beat us no matter who we roll out with at QB Brissett is no joke and plays hard.

My feelings exactly.

Posted
18 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said:

 

So... this is not the poster I was thinking it was.

 

FWIW the poster I'm  thinking of is on another message board and yesterday made this exact same statement that Peterman would be starting. He has been right about a whole lot of things lately and I know he knows someone.

 

However, today he retracted that statement and said that now "if Taylor can take a snap, he plays."

 

So, who knows? 0:)

 

Yup.  I was thinking about posting this but figured I'd let it lie and if Peterman didn't start I'd just take my lumps. 

 

But it does seem that there are some internal division over who should start.  That's not a good sign. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Yup.  I was thinking about posting this but figured I'd let it lie and if Peterman didn't start I'd just take my lumps. 

 

But it does seem that there are some internal division over who should start.  That's not a good sign. 

 

Weird. I'd love to know who wants which QB to start.

 

Last time, from my understanding, Dennison was the driving factor to start Peterman.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Yup.  I was thinking about posting this but figured I'd let it lie and if Peterman didn't start I'd just take my lumps. 

 

But it does seem that there are some internal division over who should start.  That's not a good sign. 

 

Meh.

 

Next September is when it will matter who is starting. Choosing Taylor or Peterman is like picking between vomiting all over yourself or having diarrhea.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Yup.  I was thinking about posting this but figured I'd let it lie and if Peterman didn't start I'd just take my lumps. 

 

But it does seem that there are some internal division over who should start.  That's not a good sign. 

 

Weird I wonder why they're not all on the same page? Doesn't sound like we have great leadership. Well I'm guessing it will be Tyrod at this point. But with his mobility hampered I don't think it's the right call.

×
×
  • Create New...