B-Man Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 (edited) Quote Nikki HaleyVerified account @nikkihaley 18h18 hours ago “The United States will not be lectured to by countries that lack any credibility when it comes to treating both Israelis and Palestinians fairly.” HALEY in 2020 ! . Edited December 9, 2017 by B-Man 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 Another Jeane Kirkpatrick? yes please Haley in 2024, you mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westerndecline Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 1 hour ago, B-Man said: HALEY in 2020 ! . Like how the US government supports the Saudis or Iran, Iraq, and Egypt when it's convenient Seriously??? 1 hour ago, B-Man said: HALEY in 2020 ! . https://youtu.be/_WVtpao0KSM https://youtu.be/_WVtpao0KSM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justice Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 1 hour ago, B-Man said: HALEY in 2020 ! . Is that a serious tweet?? I mean come the F on!!! Is she serious? And you eat that crap up too. Hypocrisy at its finest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 I think Nikki Haley would be a leader in the Margaret Thatcher mold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 14 minutes ago, Justice said: Is that a serious tweet?? I mean come the F on!!! Is she serious? And you eat that crap up too. Hypocrisy at its finest. All you have to do is click on it. Nikki HaleyVerified account @nikkihaley 18h18 hours ago She is very serious. Perhaps you should read someone else's opinion before before you blather on. Just a thought. . S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justice Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 5 minutes ago, B-Man said: All you have to do is click on it. Nikki HaleyVerified account @nikkihaley 18h18 hours ago She is very serious. Perhaps you should read someone else's opinion before before you blather on. Just a thought. . S It was a rhetorical question and so is this one: when you’re being brainwashed do you realize it? Now here comes sarcasm: no way are we biased in any way towards Israel! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justice Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 This goes out to Mr Copynpaste Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yall Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 Funny, the Palestinians want Israel to share. Ask how they feel about sharing the Al Aqsa? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westerndecline Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 1 minute ago, yall said: Funny, the Palestinians want Israel to share. Ask how they feel about sharing the Al Aqsa? The dome of the rock is non negotiable Both sides are nuts on tht issue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yall Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 Both sides are nuts. Regardless, if the Palestinians hadn't been dicks and accepted the 47 borders we wouldn't be here. Cue some apologist for extremism to chime in and explain to us how the Jews really never would have stuck to that agreement. Of course we'll never know because people insist on constantly attacking them and justify the land grabs as necessary for security. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westerndecline Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 5 minutes ago, yall said: Both sides are nuts. Regardless, if the Palestinians hadn't been dicks and accepted the 47 borders we wouldn't be here. Cue some apologist for extremism to chime in and explain to us how the Jews really never would have stuck to that agreement. Of course we'll never know because people insist on constantly attacking them and justify the land grabs as necessary for security. From ww1-ww2 The Jews were offered Madagascar, part of Alaska, part of Germany, and numerous other areas that were A- less populated B- the areas had little to no nationalism that would have issues with the Jews C- even more land... Why did they reject it???? Why did they punish the million or so Palestinian ppl, for the holocaust. Meanwhile Jews still could have lived in and visited their sky daddy holy sites without all the bull **** we see now. Almost all our foreign policy enemies in the me are created by this retarded geo political DISASTER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yall Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 Obviously they wanted the land connected with their religious beliefs. Funny though, "less populated" makes it better. To hell with those Inuit, m I rite? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westerndecline Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 1 minute ago, yall said: Obviously they wanted the land connected with their religious beliefs. Funny though, "less populated" makes it better. To hell with those Inuit, m I rite? I guess The point is there was dozens of other very nice areas that would have been a million times easier. Thts why I have no sympathy for the Jewish ppl on this issue I personally think a racial or ethnic state is idiotic and hateful But if anyone deserved one the Jews did, just not the worst area EVER!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sherpa Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 17 minutes ago, westerndecline said: The point is there was dozens of other very nice areas that would have been a million times easier. Thts why I have no sympathy for the Jewish ppl on this issue I personally think a racial or ethnic state is idiotic and hateful But if anyone deserved one the Jews did, just not the worst area EVER!!! It isn't about "very nice areas." The "Jewish ppl," I suspect, have very little respect for an individual who thinks like this, with total disregard for 5000 years of history tied to this land. I'm not judging one way or the other, but to state that some other place would have been "easier" is ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 53 minutes ago, westerndecline said: I guess The point is there was dozens of other very nice areas that would have been a million times easier. Thts why I have no sympathy for the Jewish ppl on this issue I personally think a racial or ethnic state is idiotic and hateful But if anyone deserved one the Jews did, just not the worst area EVER!!! Tom I think your houseplants are much smarter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westerndecline Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, sherpa said: It isn't about "very nice areas." The "Jewish ppl," I suspect, have very little respect for an individual who thinks like this, with total disregard for 5000 years of history tied to this land. I'm not judging one way or the other, but to state that some other place would have been "easier" is ridiculous. By this logic we should give the natives half or all the United states back hundreds of years after the wars were won, the language, culture and religion already changed. Along with neighbors already accepting the United states fromthe north south and around the world.... Before ww1 the Jewish population was less than 5% Before 1900 it was less than 2 % and around that percentage for thousands of years. They area already was won centuries prior, known by its neighbors as Palestine, along with a ppl, culture, and language already established. Fast forward to the 30 and 40s ( still a minority), the Jews conduct massive terrorism vs the Palestinian ppl and then 1948, a million ppl in total are told to leave and get !@#$ed basically. This is well after the numerous areas the Jews were offered.... All this because a desert person 4000 years ago said a patch of land is their s because God said so. Are you !@#$in kidding me right now??? Your analogy makes no sense anyway. The Jewish ppl and their culture would still be Jewish lol. The sand and trees have nothing to do with it lol 1 hour ago, meazza said: Tom I think your houseplants are much smarter. Ad hominem Besides that was in reference to tasker using the word utilitarianism to sound smart. Thts why I bragged about 129iq jackass lol Edited December 9, 2017 by westerndecline retarded person Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justice Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 2 hours ago, yall said: Both sides are nuts. Regardless, if the Palestinians hadn't been dicks and accepted the 47 borders we wouldn't be here. Cue some apologist for extremism to chime in and explain to us how the Jews really never would have stuck to that agreement. Of course we'll never know because people insist on constantly attacking them and justify the land grabs as necessary for security. A Palestinian didn’t assassinate Rabin. An Israeli did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sherpa Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 "Very nice areas" is as wasteful a postulate as it is stupid, in this context. The "Jews" have settled it, owned it, developed it and defended it against countless aggression, against all odds, besides being thrown out of it and enslaved before moving back to it, twice. They are never going to give it up. Nor should they. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts