Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...pretty sure everybody gets that bud....BUT, with the battle cry being "THE worst WR's in the league" as a dominant reason for our feeble passing attack, why not give a kid who was a pre-season shining star a shot  if the existing corp sucks as advertised?..just my 2 cents...

This organization/ team / coaching staff is so stupid. We rarely throw to Holmes, O'Leary or Thomas anyway. Why not give Reilly a shot? Just dumb.

Edited by LABILLBACKER
Posted
On 12/10/2017 at 1:01 PM, Buffalo Barbarian said:

This is why the the inactive roster needs to be deactivated permanently at the next player negotiations.

 

There is ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to have 53 players and not have them all active.

 

The problem with that is some players will get abused. If a player is a high draft pick or a high salary cap player and is injured he will sit but for a player who was a UFA the player will get waved to get another body in otherwise you hear complaints how other team had more active (healthy) players.

Posted
10 hours ago, Limeaid said:

 

The problem with that is some players will get abused. If a player is a high draft pick or a high salary cap player and is injured he will sit but for a player who was a UFA the player will get waved to get another body in otherwise you hear complaints how other team had more active (healthy) players.

 

Not buying it, if you make the team your active plain and simple.

Posted
14 hours ago, Buffalo Barbarian said:

 

Not buying it, if you make the team your active plain and simple.

 

Fortunately NFL will take your advice as often as Bills will on trading a starting DE for QB.

Posted
On 12/10/2017 at 6:22 PM, Freddie's Dead said:

Reilly already in the McD doghouse, along with Jon Miller.

 

He was in the practice doghouse before. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Rico said:

I don't understand this either. High-motor lunch-pail WRs can be useful in winter games.

 

...gonna be our secret weapon for the playoffs I guess..............

Posted

Glad that we protected Holmes, Ducasse and Davis. I would have preferred Reilly, Groy, Eric Lee and a 3rd but what do I know. 

 

I am excited to see Reilly get a chance. I think that he gets open. That’s something that our receivers not named Thompson have a hard time doing. I don’t want to get carried away but think that he could be a contributor moving forward.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
21 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said:

Glad that we protected Holmes, Ducasse and Davis. I would have preferred Reilly, Groy, Eric Lee and a 3rd but what do I know. 

 

I am excited to see Reilly get a chance. I think that he gets open. That’s something that our receivers not named Thompson have a hard time doing. I don’t want to get carried away but think that he could be a contributor moving forward.

 

It's tough to argue against this statement. I have to agree.

Posted
On 12/5/2017 at 1:20 PM, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

He did look good in preseason. Now we'll get to see what he's got against NFL caliber DBs

It shouldn't have taken this long considering Matthews and Holmes have been worthless. Good luck Brandon.

×
×
  • Create New...