Jump to content

Gronk committed deliberate, intentional, and defenseless criminal assault with his metal elbow brace


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, mannc said:

You are missing the crucial (and, I thought obvious) point that what Gronk did was well after the play had ended.  It had nothing to do with a football play.  It was a cowardly assault, no different from a batter clubbing an unsuspecting catcher with his bat between pitches.  I am amazed you can’t see that.

 

It's a lot different than that.  Come on, man.

Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

Correct. Even Rodney Harrison said last night he would be in jail if this happened on the street. 

 

And he made it perfectly clear that Gronkowski should be suspended...a former Patriot, too.

 

My worry is that since Crabtree & Talib had their suspensions reduced from 2 games to 1 for their all-over-the-field, temper-tantrum spat, then Gronkowski will get a fine and a wrist-slap.

 

As mush as this may sound like sour grapes, you can't convince me that Gronk isn't roiding it up. Don't give me the "heat of the battle" argument, either.

Edited by BuffaloWings
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Gugny said:

 

It's a lot different than that.  Come on, man.

So if you put yourself in Tre White shoes I'm assuming you tell everyone it's not a big deal and it's just the NFL?

Edited by Lfod
Posted
13 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

You guys know he isn't even going to be suspended, right?

 

Oh, he will be. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Gugny said:

 

It's a lot different than that.  Come on, man.

Not so sure about that.  I would like to know what the elbow brace is made of, direct and powerful elbow to the head with a brace, gronk putting all his body weight in it. 

 

Notice Gronk's footwork before he rears up to gain more leverage to come down on his head.  The more you look at it the more deliberate and disgusting it is, he set up tre white for as forceful an impact as possible.

Posted
1 minute ago, Mrbojanglezs said:

Interesting point. If a baseball player swings his bat at a player's head would there be criminal charges? Should be.

 

It is an interesting point.  Consider this too, the DA in Erie County doesn't need the NFL's permission to file a charge.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
44 minutes ago, Gugny said:

Hyperbole much?

 

It was a dirty hit.  Very dirty.  But no one came close to dying and he shouldn't be brought up on criminal charges.  This wasn't a curling match, for Christ's sake. 

 

Actually, it was a criminal hit.  It was after the play.  Hockey players have been charged criminally, and fighting is permitted in the sport.  If it was during a play and it was a dirty chop-block, perhaps not criminal.  This was.  

Posted

May not be up to the NFL and Goodell. This should be a law enforcement matter. Gronk intentionally used his "metal elbow" as a deadly weapon. His actions were not part of the game of football. This was assault.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, ProcessTheTrust said:

Real life criminal charges, no. Suspended for the rest of the season to send the message this is unacceptable, yes. But I'm sure Goodell and Kraft and kissed and made up since deflategate, so probably not happening.

 

The DA should file criminal charges if the NFL does not suspend Gronk for at least 2 games--if not the season.  Sends the message that if the NFL won't protect players from after the whistle hits, DA's will.  

1 minute ago, reginald said:

May not be up to the NFL and Goodell. This should be a law enforcement matter. Gronk intentionally used his "metal elbow" as a deadly weapon. His actions were not part of the game of football. This was assault.

 

BINGO.  This is the exact standard used in other cases.  Hopefully the Erie County DA takes action if the weak-kneed NFL won't.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, dorquemada said:

 

It is an interesting point.  Consider this too, the DA in Erie County doesn't need the NFL's permission to file a charge.

 

Erie County DA office # is 716-858-2424

Posted
10 minutes ago, May Day 10 said:

 

I agree with this.  It seems like an easy decision.  Looking at comments sections, even Pats fans agree that it was an awful thing.  Such a cowardly and dangerous attack.  

 

The decision to suspend is easy, in light of all the factors (including the score/time of the game)... the hard part will be pushing it to more than 1 game (which IMO should be 3-4 games).  The NFL will likely come up short.

 

 

I agree, they will likely come up short.  If they suspend Zeke Elliot for what, 6 games, they should suspend Gronk the rest of the regular season but i highly doubt the NFL will have the balls to do that.  Entire system for suspensions is a farce.

Posted
Just now, RyanC883 said:

 

The DA should file criminal charges if the NFL does not suspend Gronk for at least 2 games--if not the season.  Sends the message that if the NFL won't protect players from after the whistle hits, DA's will.  

I hear ya, but that would cross a line pro sports isn't ready to cross anytime soon. It's a pseudo world of self-governance that doesn't involve real law on field. Out of my own bias, I'd LOVE for you to be right but objectively, I'm not seeing it.

Posted
42 minutes ago, Gugny said:

 

No.  It wouldn't.  It would be a personal foul; he'd get fined and suspended.  Just like what will - and should - happen to Gronkowski.

image.png.8fff639c41564ffc84c8e4a909e6a4be.png

Just now, ProcessTheTrust said:

I hear ya, but that would cross a line pro sports isn't ready to cross anytime soon. It's a pseudo world of self-governance that doesn't involve real law on field. Out of my own bias, I'd LOVE for you to be right but objectively, I'm not seeing it.

 

I agree that 'pro sports' isn't ready to cross that line, but it isn't really up to them.  An enterprising DA can make this decision and pursue a case with or without the cooperation of the NFL or the Buffalo Bills.

×
×
  • Create New...