dorquemada Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 1 minute ago, Playoffs? said: Makes me nuts that 5 guys didn’t beat Gronk to a pulp after that. I understand two wrongs don’t make a right, but how do you not stand up for a teammate like that? Screams gutless... and the Pats are somewhere laughing about it. can you imagine darryl talley whining like a baby and lobbying the refs in this situation if he were in Preston Brown's shoes at the moment? No, me neither
CanadianFan Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 3 minutes ago, Gugny said: I did nothing of the sort. I agreed with another user that he should be suspended for the remainder of the regular season. I'm sorry I'm not in the "tar, feather, castrate, then decapitate," camp. It's a !@#$ing game. It's a !@#$ing tough game and bad things happen sometimes. Gronk is not a dirty player. He is a great player who made a stupid mistake. Big !@#$ing deal. LOL deny deny deny. I never asked for Gronk's head. He should be PUNISHED. But deflecting, calling our anger at a brutal criminal MUGGING as "NOTHING" is AN ACT OF APPROVAL FOR GRONK'S HIT. you just CONDONED HIS ACT. that's INEXCUSABLE. REGARDLESS OF WHICH TEAM YOU ARE A FAN OF.
Gugny Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, Lfod said: I thought at this time in history people were striving for an equality. So I'd want the same equal treatment if attacked then everyone else. Just pointless talking points to deflect blame of his favorite player. He probably is my favorite player in the league. But I still think he should be suspended for the next 4 games.
dorquemada Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 Just now, Gugny said: Show me how it's relevant to the NFL (like my domestic abuse comparison) and you might be on the right track. But so far .... no. You !@#$ed it up pretty badly. Nah, you moved the goalposts and got called out like the gronk fanboy you are. Well done old chap
Gugny Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 1 minute ago, dorquemada said: Nah, you moved the goalposts and got called out like the gronk fanboy you are. Well done old chap Moved the goalposts. That's one of my favorites that one of my favorite posters on here likes to use. Interesting. Have a great day, my friend.
dorquemada Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, Gugny said: He probably is my favorite player in the league. But I still think he should be suspended for the next 4 games. here you go gugny, this should keep you busy 1
Sweats Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 I replayed the hit over and over a few times just to make sure that i was actually seeing what i was seeing, and yeah, that was vicious and deliberate by Gronk. The dude needs a suspension and be fined..........but it the Pats, so he'll get a little slap on the wrist and it don't matter cause its only Buffalo. McD AND the Bills players should be pissed.
Gugny Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 Just now, dorquemada said: here you go gugny, this should keep you busy I can't see that, as I am at work. But I'm sure it's some sort of shot at me for liking Gronk. I've always liked Brady, too. I love great football and they're the best at what they do. Fun to watch. I have no shame in saying that and I still want to see them lose every week (except yesterday and this Christmas Eve - we need the losses). But they're a pleasure to watch. Good stuff.
Lfod Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Gugny said: He probably is my favorite player in the league. But I still think he should be suspended for the next 4 games. The guy is a beast. He dominated. Yes he was getting mauled. I think people are just venting feelings a lot like Gronk was venting his. It's to be expected I think that people would react strongly. He didn't need to do what he did because it wasn't gonna effect the outcome. Self control is what's needed and what's expected I imagine at that level in football and it wasn't just a little extra pushing or jaberjaw. Take out the names of the players and teams. Whatever happens to Gronk should be the same to anyone who would do the same as he did. It could be people are over reacting bring up actual criminal charges and such but some if that is just anger over the incident. I don't really care what happens to him punishment wise just don't send the message that it's ok to do something like that or it's a minor thing. That's the point your stressing to people not to over react. That's this is NFL and stuff happens. That would be my message to Gronk. Sometimes flags don't go your way and plays get made. You have to be in control of your emotions. A lot of money on the line to act before you think. Edited December 4, 2017 by Lfod
johnmouse Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 Someone should call the DA on Hughes too. That kind of deadly language would get you arrested on the street. Disgusting. Never seen anything like it.
YoloinOhio Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 1 hour ago, Chris66 said: The brace protects the metal rods in his forearm. He has been wearing it for 2 years +. And? No one said he put it in just for this game. They said he used it to enhance a vicious dirty hit to the back of a defenseless player’s head. No one cares if he wears it every game, wears it to bed, or on the Gronk cruise.
dorquemada Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 Just now, johnmouse said: Someone should call the DA on Hughes too. That kind of deadly language would get you arrested on the street. Disgusting. Never seen anything like it. i assume you're joking, but did anyone ever find out what he actually said?
Chris66 Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 1 minute ago, YoloinOhio said: And? No one said he put it in just for this game. They said he used it to enhance a vicious dirty hit to the back of a defenseless player’s head. No one cares if he wears it every game, wears it to bed, or on the Gronk cruise. The question was asked why he wears it. I provided the answer nothing else.
HappyDays Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 14 minutes ago, dorquemada said: here you go gugny, this should keep you busy I consider this post assault with a deadly weapon
YoloinOhio Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Chris66 said: The question was asked why he wears it. I provided the answer nothing else. Since it wasn’t posted in response to a question, and was posted as singular post without a quote, that was not clear. Edited December 4, 2017 by YoloinOhio
Gugny Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 12 minutes ago, Lfod said: The guy is a beast. He dominated. Yes he was getting mauled. I think people are just venting feelings a lot like Gronk was venting his. It's to be expected I think that people would react strongly. He didn't need to do what he did because it wasn't gonna effect the outcome. Self control is what's needed and what's expected I imagine at that level in football and it wasn't just a little extra pushing or jaberjaw. Take out the names of the players and teams. Whatever happens to Gronk should be the same to anyone who would do the same as he did. It could be people are over reacting bring up actual criminal charges and such but some if that is just anger over the incident. I don't really care what happens to him punishment wise just don't send the message that it's ok to do something like that or it's a minor thing. That's the point your stressing to people not to over react. That's this is NFL and stuff happens. That would be my message to Gronk. Sometimes flags don't go your way and plays get made. You have to be in control of your emotions. A lot of money on the line to act before you think. Yeah, man, I totally agree. We need to take the players - and the teams - out of it, when discussing (some of us, anyway) what a fair punishment would be. It infuriated me when it happened. I still think it was a horrible hit. But it's not Gronk. If it was Burfict or Suh or Bryan Cox ... yes ... MAJOR suspension and fine. I just think criminal charges are a stretch. Especially for a player who has otherwise been clean - on and off the field - for his entire career. 9 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: And? No one said he put it in just for this game. They said he used it to enhance a vicious dirty hit to the back of a defenseless player’s head. No one cares if he wears it every game, wears it to bed, or on the Gronk cruise. Yes. But, based on some of these reactions, you'd think the INT happened ... then Gronk went to the sideline to put on the "deadly weapon," and subsequently "assaulted" White on the following Pats* possession.
BadLandsMeanie Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 I think people are bringing up criminal charges because so far, nobody else is doing anything about it. Call it what you will, but literally nothing was done about it. "Offsetting penalties" canceled everything out. Poyer pushed a Pat (sound like a Dr Suess line) so that cancelled out the penalty for attacking a prone player from behind. And the Hughes mouthed off to an official, so that penalty was enforced. If these are the rules, they are idiotic. No other excuse for it. So, people want some justice. Here are the options. A) Patriots bench him for a few games (What I would do if I was the coach, but it won't happen) B) League suspends him for enough games to make it seem fair. C) Bills take him out themselves next game. D) Fans handle it in some very bad way. E) Law enforcement handles it F) Nothing happens The only two sensible outcomes are A or B, where the people with the responsibility, behave responsibly. If they do not, they are inviting one of the less civilized approaches. Since people have no confidence that A or B will happen, the next most responsible approach is E, law enforcement. It isn't a stupid idea. It is the next best responsible approach left to citizens if the ones with authority chicken out from their responsibilities. 2 1
JohnBonhamRocks Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 ^ To avoid quoting whole post, good one BLM. I especially like "Poyer pushed a Pat (sound like a Dr Suess line)" and option (C).
dorquemada Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Gugny said: Yeah, man, I totally agree. We need to take the players - and the teams - out of it, when discussing (some of us, anyway) what a fair punishment would be. It infuriated me when it happened. I still think it was a horrible hit. But it's not Gronk. If it was Burfict or Suh or Bryan Cox ... yes ... MAJOR suspension and fine. I just think criminal charges are a stretch. Especially for a player who has otherwise been clean - on and off the field - for his entire career. Yes. But, based on some of these reactions, you'd think the INT happened ... then Gronk went to the sideline to put on the "deadly weapon," and subsequently "assaulted" White on the following Pats* possession. even the marginal personalities at deadspin are calling him out on this. your island is getting pretty thinly populated. before long it'll just be you and gronk Edited December 4, 2017 by dorquemada
thunderingsquid Posted December 4, 2017 Posted December 4, 2017 6 minutes ago, BadLandsMeanie said: I think people are bringing up criminal charges because so far, nobody else is doing anything about it. Call it what you will, but literally nothing was done about it. "Offsetting penalties" canceled everything out. Poyer pushed a Pat (sound like a Dr Suess line) so that cancelled out the penalty for attacking a prone player from behind. And the Hughes mouthed off to an official, so that penalty was enforced. If these are the rules, they are idiotic. No other excuse for it. So, people want some justice. Here are the options. A) Patriots bench him for a few games (What I would do if I was the coach, but it won't happen) B) League suspends him for enough games to make it seem fair. C) Bills take him out themselves next game. D) Fans handle it in some very bad way. E) Law enforcement handles it F) Nothing happens The only two sensible outcomes are A or B, where the people with the responsibility, behave responsibly. If they do not, they are inviting one of the less civilized approaches. Since people have no confidence that A or B will happen, the next most responsible approach is E, law enforcement. It isn't a stupid idea. It is the next best responsible approach left to citizens if the ones with authority chicken out from their responsibilities. I like C and D.
Recommended Posts