Gugny Posted December 1, 2017 Posted December 1, 2017 Unless they keep passing short of the first down marker on 3rd downs, that is. 1
Rocky Landing Posted December 1, 2017 Posted December 1, 2017 You don't not know nothing about football. 1
LABILLBACKER Posted December 1, 2017 Posted December 1, 2017 The only thing more frustrating then checkdowns on 3rd and long are running plays on 2nd & 12....
Gugny Posted December 1, 2017 Author Posted December 1, 2017 6 minutes ago, Rocky Landing said: You don't not know nothing about football. You didn't not tell me anything that I don't not not know.
JMF2006 Posted December 1, 2017 Posted December 1, 2017 Oh sure try to scramble whats left of my brains on a Friday Not Not Gonna happen Can I unread that title somehow?
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 1, 2017 Posted December 1, 2017 (edited) 3 hours ago, LABILLBACKER said: The only thing more frustrating then checkdowns on 3rd and long are running plays on 2nd & 12.... .....sure beats "3rd and a whole lotta real estate (Keith Jackson speak) Shaud draw"..........OBD Classic............"Reggie Reverse" rings in at #2................ Edited December 1, 2017 by OldTimeAFLGuy
transient Posted December 1, 2017 Posted December 1, 2017 4 hours ago, LABILLBACKER said: The only thing more frustrating then checkdowns on 3rd and long are running plays on 2nd & 12.... ...or using “then” in place of “than” in what isn’t not clearly a thread devoted to grammar, for all intensive purposes.
Patrick Duffy Posted December 1, 2017 Posted December 1, 2017 Anybody that knows anything about football knows that Peterman to O'leary is the new Peyton to Clark.
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted December 1, 2017 Posted December 1, 2017 4 minutes ago, transient said: ...or using “then” in place of “than” in what isn’t not clearly a thread devoted to grammar, for all intensive purposes. Thanks I just love seeing people correct other people’s typos (most likely due to autocorrect).
Clyde Smith Posted December 1, 2017 Posted December 1, 2017 19 minutes ago, transient said: ...or using “then” in place of “than” in what isn’t not clearly a thread devoted to grammar, for all intensive purposes. Actually it's "Intents and purpose".
oldmanfan Posted December 2, 2017 Posted December 2, 2017 Unless they win. Or not. Or not win. Or not. Do I have it right?
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted December 2, 2017 Posted December 2, 2017 Who’s on first? I Don’t Know is the RB.
transient Posted December 2, 2017 Posted December 2, 2017 1 hour ago, ShadyBillsFan said: Thanks I just love seeing people correct other people’s typos (most likely due to autocorrect). You’re welcome. FYI, your autocorrect edited out the punctuation after “Thanks...”
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 2, 2017 Posted December 2, 2017 1 hour ago, Clyde Smith said: Actually it's "Intents and purpose". Disirregardless, i think you missed the point.
Alphadawg7 Posted December 2, 2017 Posted December 2, 2017 My head. hurts reading the title of the thread
JMF2006 Posted December 2, 2017 Posted December 2, 2017 1 hour ago, Clyde Smith said: Actually it's "Intents and purpose". I thought it was interns and porpoises
transient Posted December 2, 2017 Posted December 2, 2017 2 hours ago, Clyde Smith said: Actually it's "Intents and purpose". I don’t know; I was told intensive purposes was supposably the correct usage, but only in this pacific situation.
Recommended Posts