Safe Place for Peterman Fans...... And those upset Tyrod Starting

[K D]

can we start Peterman after we get smoked the next 2 games?  i'm not a Peterman fan, I'm a lose the rest of the games and get a good QB fan

[BillsFan130]

5 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

No.

AND THAT'S THE POINT.

 

I don't want 7-9.

 

I'm SICK of 7-9. If you're not making they playoffs, you have to be as bad as possible.

 

And believe me or not, this team even with Tyrod Taylor under center, is NOT making the playoffs.

 

Understand now?

 

There goes wayyyyy more into besides finishing 7-9.

 

How is Mcd supposed to sell that to the locker room if he starts Peterman?

 

Do you actually think players on the Bills now and potential players in the future would want to play for a guy who threw in the towel during a playoff run?...Yes they aren't going to make the playoffs but that's not the point here.

 

Tanking on purpose is a cardinal sin in the NFL. Mcd was smart enough to figure that out

 

[apuszczalowski]

Tanking worked so well for the Pegulas other team..........

[Pine Barrens Mafia]

Just now, billsfan11 said:

 

 

Tanking on purpose is a cardinal sin in the NFL. Mcd was smart enough to figure that out

 

Except when it's not and you end up with a Goff, Wentz, or Luck.

 

But hey, whatever. Conventional thinking's what had us mired in mediocre hell for the past two decades.

 

1 minute ago, apuszczalowski said:

Tanking worked so well for the Pegulas other team..........

 

It did what it was supposed to. Got them Eichel. It's just they haven't followed that up. But I'm sure you knew that.

 

[BillsFan130]

Just now, joesixpack said:

Except when it's not and you end up with a Goff, Wentz, or Luck.

 

But hey, whatever. Conventional thinking's what had us mired in mediocre hell for the past two decades.

 

Those teams never tanked on purpose to get those QBS. 

 

Rams were a dumpster fire, Eagles traded up, and Colts got Luck because Manning got hurt and that team was just brutal.

 

Losing games vs tanking on purpose is apples and oranges.

 

I for one don't even care if the Bills lose the rest of their games because to your point it would get them a higher pick.

 

But as a coach, you cannot do that to your locker room. You just can't. Unless you want to lose respect from every single player

 

[Pine Barrens Mafia]

1 minute ago, billsfan11 said:

Those teams never tanked on purpose to get those QBS. 

 

Rams were a dumpster fire, Eagles traded up, and Colts got Luck because Manning got hurt and that team was just brutal.

 

Losing games vs tanking on purpose is apples and oranges.

 

I for one don't even care if the Bills lose the rest of their games because to your point it would get them a higher pick.

 

But as a coach, you cannot do that to your locker room. You just can't. Unless you want to lose respect from every single player

 

Well let's hope they DO lose the rest. I think 5-11 could get us into the top 8, which would make life a WHOLE lot easier for the front office.

 

[BigDingus]

You do realize you don't have to be a Peterman fan and still think Tyrod sucks right? 

Because no matter how bad Peterman was on Sunday, it doesn't change anything we've seen of Taylor for the 3 seasons now. He's still not a good QB.

[BillsFan130]

12 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

Well let's hope they DO lose the rest. I think 5-11 could get us into the top 8, which would make life a WHOLE lot easier for the front office.

 

I agree with that

[BuffaloBill]

Plenty of threads out here already on the Tyrod and Peterman discussion.