Tyrod to start vs Chiefs

[YoloinOhio]

Per McDermott 

 

gobble gobble

Edited November 22, 2017 by YoloinOhio

[26CornerBlitz]

 

[GG]

Said there was dialogue with players council, but it was his decision

[YoloinOhio]

 

[Pine Barrens Mafia]

Kind of weak, but unsurprising.

 

[26CornerBlitz]

Obvious decision.

Edited November 22, 2017 by 26CornerBlitz

[Billzgobowlin]

I think he had too.  He almost certainly would have lost the team.  I think what took him so long was KC had to wait to prepare fully

[Gugny]

Weak and stupid decision.

 

Zero balls.

[MarkyMannn]

No Brainer

[YoloinOhio]

 

[Shaw66]

Just now, Billzgobowlin said:

I think he had too.  He almost certainly would have lost the team.  I think what took him so long was KC had to wait to prepare fully

I think he probably already has lost the team, but you're right.   He'd be facing a player revolt if he started Peterman.  

[BillsFan130]

Took him long enough

[papazoid]

had to

 

would have lost team

[teef]

meh.  

[PIZ]

Tryrod needs to understand WHY he was benched, AND correct his game.  I hope he gets it.

[Woodman19]

Peterman will be back when we are officially out.  Probably after the Patriots game.  Tyrod isn't a bad choice for the next two games.

[CountDorkula]

3 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

Obvious decision.

disagree, it makes it look like the coach has no idea what he is doing. 

 

You already told the world you don't think Taylor is good enough. You went to a guy, it backfired, but now you are going to say the guy you benched is now your best player.

 

 

[HappyDays]

I was expecting Peterman but this is the right move. The rookie isn’t ready.

[26CornerBlitz]

 

[PromoTheRobot]

Just now, Shaw66 said:

I think he probably already has lost the team, but you're right.   He'd be facing a player revolt if he started Peterman.  

Lost the team? Why don't they show some pride and actually do their jobs?