ChicagoRic Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 I called the QB decision this past week an unmitigated disaster. I stand by that. The Peterman experiment should be over. Tyrod would have come into this game with something to prove and likely would have pulled out the win. Hoping now that his benching has given him the motivation to play with heat to the end of this season to end his tenure with the Bills. 1
zow2 Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 When you give up 50+ points there is a 0% chance Tyrod would have flipped that into a W. Would have been closer but not a W. That’s a fact. 6
unclepete Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 (edited) 1 minute ago, zow2 said: When you give up 50+ points there is a 0% chance Tyrod would have flipped that into a W. Would have been closer but not a W. That’s a fact. They don't score 50 if Tyrod starts. There would be 5 fewer turnovers. It's not certain that we win but it's a much more competitive game. San Diego plays everyone close. We found a way to get blown out. Edited November 20, 2017 by unclepete 3
Roundybout Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, ChicagoRic said: I called the QB decision this past week an unmitigated disaster. I stand by that. The Peterman experiment should be over. Tyrod would have come into this game with something to prove and likely would have pulled out the win. Hoping now that his benching has given him the motivation to play with heat to the end of this season to end his tenure with the Bills. On one hand, Tyrod probably doesnt throw 5 picks. On the other hand, he goes 3-out as usual so it really is the same.
McNubbins Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, zow2 said: When you give up 50+ points there is a 0% chance Tyrod would have flipped that into a W. Would have been closer but not a W. That’s a fact. lol A fictional fact, then? 1
Imissbeastmode Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 Two bad weeks by Tyrod, one bad game by Peterman. Bills need a QB. 3
MAJBobby Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 5 minutes ago, ChicagoRic said: I called the QB decision this past week an unmitigated disaster. I stand by that. The Peterman experiment should be over. Tyrod would have come into this game with something to prove and likely would have pulled out the win. Hoping now that his benching has given him the motivation to play with heat to the end of this season to end his tenure with the Bills. No he really doesnt he doesnt outscore Chargers now does he
Iron Maiden Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, unclepete said: They don't score 50 if Tyrod starts. There would be 5 fewer turnovers. It's not certain that we win but it's a much more competitive game. San Diego plays everyone close. We found a way to get blown out. Yet, the thread title....
Scott7975 Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 Defense still sucks. Doubt we win it but don't think the game gets that out of hand.
Wayne Cubed Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, zow2 said: When you give up 50+ points there is a 0% chance Tyrod would have flipped that into a W. Would have been closer but not a W. That’s a fact. Not that this matters a whole lot, but 14 of those 54 points were off of turnovers. The first 24 points came off of turnovers. Things might have been a bit different without all the turnovers, who knows.
PABillsfan23 Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 Where do people come up with this nonsense?
BillsFan130 Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 No way in hell. Would have been closer but they wouldn't have won
Ramza86 Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 Tyrod needed to be benched to throw the ball down the field? What kinda crap is that? Why couldnt he just be aggressive naturally? 1 1
Lfod Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 Well I appreciate Tyrod more now. I still don't think we win this game but Nathan rekindled my love for Tyrod man.
nedboy7 Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 So when we lose it's Tyrod's fault. But when we lose with out him it's the defense. This is just getting so stupid. 1
mannc Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 No way to know, but at least they have a chance with Tyrod. I think a lot of veterans will see this as a game given away with an historically poor coach’s decision, where a win puts this team in pretty good playoff position. That’s how you lose a locker room. 1
nedboy7 Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 Just now, mannc said: No way to know, but at least they have a chance with Tyrod. I think a lot of veterans will see this as a game given away with an historically poor coach’s decision, where a win puts this team in pretty good playoff position. That’s how you lose a locker room. absolutely.
Recommended Posts