ChicagoRic Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 I called the QB decision this past week an unmitigated disaster. I stand by that. The Peterman experiment should be over. Tyrod would have come into this game with something to prove and likely would have pulled out the win. Hoping now that his benching has given him the motivation to play with heat to the end of this season to end his tenure with the Bills. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zow2 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 When you give up 50+ points there is a 0% chance Tyrod would have flipped that into a W. Would have been closer but not a W. That’s a fact. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unclepete Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 (edited) 1 minute ago, zow2 said: When you give up 50+ points there is a 0% chance Tyrod would have flipped that into a W. Would have been closer but not a W. That’s a fact. They don't score 50 if Tyrod starts. There would be 5 fewer turnovers. It's not certain that we win but it's a much more competitive game. San Diego plays everyone close. We found a way to get blown out. Edited November 20, 2017 by unclepete 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roundybout Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, ChicagoRic said: I called the QB decision this past week an unmitigated disaster. I stand by that. The Peterman experiment should be over. Tyrod would have come into this game with something to prove and likely would have pulled out the win. Hoping now that his benching has given him the motivation to play with heat to the end of this season to end his tenure with the Bills. On one hand, Tyrod probably doesnt throw 5 picks. On the other hand, he goes 3-out as usual so it really is the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuvian Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 it was certainly winnable with TT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McNubbins Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, zow2 said: When you give up 50+ points there is a 0% chance Tyrod would have flipped that into a W. Would have been closer but not a W. That’s a fact. lol A fictional fact, then? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldmanfan Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Dream on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imissbeastmode Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Two bad weeks by Tyrod, one bad game by Peterman. Bills need a QB. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJBobby Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 5 minutes ago, ChicagoRic said: I called the QB decision this past week an unmitigated disaster. I stand by that. The Peterman experiment should be over. Tyrod would have come into this game with something to prove and likely would have pulled out the win. Hoping now that his benching has given him the motivation to play with heat to the end of this season to end his tenure with the Bills. No he really doesnt he doesnt outscore Chargers now does he Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron Maiden Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, unclepete said: They don't score 50 if Tyrod starts. There would be 5 fewer turnovers. It's not certain that we win but it's a much more competitive game. San Diego plays everyone close. We found a way to get blown out. Yet, the thread title.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7975 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Defense still sucks. Doubt we win it but don't think the game gets that out of hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Cubed Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, zow2 said: When you give up 50+ points there is a 0% chance Tyrod would have flipped that into a W. Would have been closer but not a W. That’s a fact. Not that this matters a whole lot, but 14 of those 54 points were off of turnovers. The first 24 points came off of turnovers. Things might have been a bit different without all the turnovers, who knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teddy KGB Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PABillsfan23 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Where do people come up with this nonsense? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan130 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 No way in hell. Would have been closer but they wouldn't have won Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramza86 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Tyrod needed to be benched to throw the ball down the field? What kinda crap is that? Why couldnt he just be aggressive naturally? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lfod Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Well I appreciate Tyrod more now. I still don't think we win this game but Nathan rekindled my love for Tyrod man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 So when we lose it's Tyrod's fault. But when we lose with out him it's the defense. This is just getting so stupid. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannc Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 No way to know, but at least they have a chance with Tyrod. I think a lot of veterans will see this as a game given away with an historically poor coach’s decision, where a win puts this team in pretty good playoff position. That’s how you lose a locker room. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nedboy7 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Just now, mannc said: No way to know, but at least they have a chance with Tyrod. I think a lot of veterans will see this as a game given away with an historically poor coach’s decision, where a win puts this team in pretty good playoff position. That’s how you lose a locker room. absolutely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts