Wayne Cubed Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 Just now, Figster said: Or take a game when it still matters and test Peterman now. No harm done, may have even help kicked start tyrod into performing like a real QB. Competition at the QB position is a good thing in my humble opinion... Did you really just say no harm done? The Bills had the #6 playoff seed and are in a playoff race. They have now lost it. They got completely spanked and look like fools for making the switch. The rookie QB embarassed himself. But yea, no harm done. 1
Scott7975 Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, MAJBobby said: So they names him starter next week?? Coming in in garbage time means nada They aren't going to just keep putting Tyrod on the bench and then ask him to come in to save Nates embarrassment. I don't think there is any chance Peterman starts again.
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 Taylor. Holy effen Jesus Taylor. I was willing to give the Peterman experiment a try, doubtful as I was. But I think that answers what we need to know about for this season at least.
Figster Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Wayne Cubed said: Did you really just say no harm done? The Bills had the #6 playoff seed and are in a playoff race. They have now lost it. They got completely spanked and look like fools for making the switch. The rookie QB embarassed himself. But yea, no harm done. Incase you didn't notice Taylor looked like Trent Edwards in his last two outings. The Bills accomplished something today, Petermans not the answer. Tyrod Taylor getting benched is Taylors fault IMO... Edited November 20, 2017 by Figster
DC Tom Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 I am so far past caring that the light from caring will take fifty thousand years to reach me. Doesn't matter who starts. The team isn't just broken, it's spectacularly broken, and has fallen apart with remarkable speed. 1
Scott7975 Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 Just now, Figster said: Incase you didn't notice Taylor looked like Trent Edwards in his last two outings. Tyrod Taylor getting benched is Taylors fault IMO... Taylor played just fine against the Jets. It's not his fault everyone on the team sucked. He **** the bed against the Saints. Won't be the first QB to have a bad game and won't be the last.
Stank_Nasty Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 41 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said: Sure he is. It was a horrible game by Nate. The announcers said maybe 2 INTs were on Nate. But sure OK You win. Taylor still is who he is. Garbage time points or not Serious colors starting to show here. If you watched that game and only thought 2 picks were his fault then you honestly are just so far gone. Just becuz a qb is getting pressured or hit when he throws doesn’t mean it wasn’t an absolutely AWFUL throw. You blasted Taylor for taking sacks in those situations but say the ints were up for debate with peterman. Pathetic dude.
Wayne Cubed Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Figster said: Incase you didn't notice Taylor looked like Trent Edwards in his last two outings. Tyrod Taylor getting benched is Taylors fault IMO... Ok? You said there was no harm in starting Peterman. There obviously was.
par73 Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 Taylor. I thought we'd see Peterman this year-- but not until after this rough stretch (SD, KC on the road, NE). Very strange timing, imo. 1
Scott7975 Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 Just now, Stank_Nasty said: Serious colors starting to show here. If you watched that game and only thought 2 picks were his fault then you honestly are just so far gone. Just becuz a qb is getting pressured or hit when he throws doesn’t mean it wasn’t an absolutely AWFUL throw. You blasted Taylor for taking sacks in those situations but say the ints were up for debate with peterman. Pathetic dude. Did you know that taking a sack and going 3 and out is the same as an INT? I learned that today.
Billsfan1972 Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 I feel bad for Peterman and no way can you start him again until the season is officially over (eliminated from the plaoffs). The locker room is lost if Nate starts..... Heck all of a sudden Rob Ryan looks like a defensive genius too.....
aceman_16 Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 10 minutes ago, Dr.Sack said: White privilege would be throwing 5 first half picks and getting rewarded with a start next week at KC. LOL nice.... I see who you are rooting for (hint: it is NOT the Bills).
Georgia Bill Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 If Peterman starts it will be a fiasco. If McD has not already lost the team he surely will if he starts Peterman after that abysmal performance in the 1st half. It will be interesting to see how McDermott deals with all the "what were you thinking" nasty press he's going to get this week. Sometimes (too many times if you're a Bills fan) coaches double down on stupidity - because the upside is the chance to show the dumb decision wasn't so dumb. Let's hope he doesn't go there.
Figster Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Wayne Cubed said: Ok? You said there was no harm in starting Peterman. There obviously was. Do you think any part of the team played well enough to win? because i don't
Stank_Nasty Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Scott7975 said: Did you know that taking a sack and going 3 and out is the same as an INT? I learned that today. Haha. Right. Nevermind the field position issues and the fact that some of his picks happened before the team could even have a chance at 3rd down. 1
Wayne Cubed Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 Just now, Figster said: Do you think any part of the team played well enough to win? because i don't We will never know how the game would have gone if Peterman didn't play... so there's that. And yea, Hauschka looked like he was playing to win.
26CornerBlitz Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 6-14 for 66 yards 0 TDs with 5 INTs. Cannot start Peterman. 2
mannc Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: 6-14 for 66 yards 0 TDs with 5 INTs. Cannot start Peterman. What’s that Quarterback Rating?
Figster Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Wayne Cubed said: We will never know how the game would have gone if Peterman didn't play... so there's that. And yea, Hauschka looked like he was playing to win. Peterman is only responsible for 1 game of a 3 game losing streak. Who takes responsibility for one of the leagues worst passing O's going on 3 seasons?
26CornerBlitz Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, mannc said: What’s that Quarterback Rating? I'm afraid to look. 1 1
Recommended Posts