Real McClappy Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 With the worst Defense in the league it honestly does not matter who starts right now. 1
Boatdrinks Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 8 minutes ago, JM2009 said: From Thad Brown today. Ah, OK thanks. I'd guess it's just another local guy that can't wrap his head around the coachspeak, and can't acknowledge this won't be announced until Wednesday. Doesn't he remember McD saying how much confidence he has in Tyrod blah blah last week? If McD somehow defies logic and stays with NP then my opinion of him will change drastically. You simply have to try to win every game until the playoffs are out of reach. If playing NP yesterday was a long term move then that's a tank and not good strategy. Every year is its own entity and you have to keep fighting. I still think he goes back to Taylor, just can't see it going any other way. We will see... 1
JM2009 Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Boatdrinks said: Ah, OK thanks. I'd guess it's just another local guy that can't wrap his head around the coachspeak, and can't acknowledge this won't be announced until Wednesday. Doesn't he remember McD saying how much confidence he has in Tyrod blah blah last week? If McD somehow defies logic and stays with NP then my opinion of him will change drastically. You simply have to try to win every game until the playoffs are out of reach. If playing NP yesterday was a long term move then that's a tank and not good strategy. Every year is its own entity and you have to keep fighting. I still think he goes back to Taylor, just can't see it going any other way. We will see... I'm with ya. Golden opportunity to make that sixth seed looks down the tubes now.
Boatdrinks Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 1 minute ago, JM2009 said: I'm with ya. Golden opportunity to make that sixth seed looks down the tubes now. Why? Still a pretty good chance. The AFC is weak and 9 looks like it'll probably be good enough this year, IF they can get back to playing decent football. It's a huge IF, I know.
Stank_Nasty Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, JM2009 said: I'm with ya. Golden opportunity to make that sixth seed looks down the tubes now. like I said yesterday around here somewhere..... the only bit of positivity I can pluck out of this deal is that maybe the benching was some sort of blessing in disguise. taylor finally lets his nuts hang and lives on the edge just enough to give the whole team a spark. not gonna hold my breath though. heck.... he may not even play. LOL.
4BillsintheBurgh Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 5 minutes ago, Real McCoy said: With the worst Defense in the league it honestly does not matter who starts right now. Seems like there will be plenty of opportunity late in a few of these games for Peterman to get some playing time. I wonder what the player council will tell McDermott.
JM2009 Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 Just now, Stank_Nasty said: like I said yesterday around here somewhere..... the only bit of positivity I can pluck out of this deal is that maybe the benching was some sort of blessing in disguise. taylor finally lets his nuts hang and lives on the edge just enough to give the whole team a spark. not gonna hold my breath though. heck.... he may not even play. LOL. Peterman could equal 5-11.
Stank_Nasty Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 (edited) 3 minutes ago, JM2009 said: Peterman could equal 5-11. right. but honestly....... even if taylor comes out and lets'm hang it still could be 6-10 or -7-9. the only hope I can see is if his improved play, which probably wont happen, creates some sort of attitude throughout the rest of the team. Edited November 20, 2017 by Stank_Nasty
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 (edited) 17 minutes ago, JPP said: And the Run Defence was main Host for those games.......which QB would you inevitabley want to go with if your not in the "tanking"frame of mind and are actual hopeful of competing in a WC spot It does not matter what I think. Im a faceless man on the internet. Taylor is who he is. Nate sucking won’t change that. Are we tanking? Who knows. Do I think TT is gone in 18. Probably. I was always for keeping TT until we were officially out of the WC Edited November 20, 2017 by ShadyBillsFan
Boatdrinks Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 Playing Peterman after that performance would be a give -up , and a fireable offense in my book.
JPP Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said: It does not matter what I think. Im a faceless man on the internet. Taylor is who he is. Nate sucking won’t change that. Are we tanking? Who knows. Do I think TT is gone in 18. Probably. I was always for keeping TT until we were officially out of the WC Was just asking thats all.......
CanadianFan Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 1 hour ago, JPP said: yeah it is quite generous.....depending on who they announce as starter i could see that line fluchuating.....it will be interesting to see what happens....im kinda resigned at the fact that this season is pretty much lost....but im slightly still entertained at the "soap opera" aspect that this team has taken on.........BTW im not really betting the house...would like to but with my luck if i did that the Bills will probably win by 20 whoever is the QB...... Season's done. What I WANTED to see was how this coach adjust in terms of SCHEMES. NOT Players. He hasn't shown he can make adjustments. Which is the hallmark of good NFL coaching.
Gray Beard Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 3 and outs kill any chances that the defense might have. If the defense is the main culprit these days, and TT may get a few more first downs than Peterman, then playing TT to give the defense a little more rest may be important. Peterman seems like the big play kind of guy, and TT seems like a grind it out kind of guy. Going for big plays will often result in 3 and out. Grind it out will likely take more time off the clock and give the defense a rest. I would put in TT if I was trying to win. I would put in Peterman if I am experimenting to see if he can be a starter someday.
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 (edited) 5 minutes ago, JPP said: Was just asking thats all....... I felt a bit verbose and wanted to cover all the bases. Someome might like it. Edited November 20, 2017 by ShadyBillsFan
Billsfan1972 Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 If McDermott names Peterman to start he should be fired on the spot!!!
reddogblitz Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 27 minutes ago, Paulus said: Do you think the rest of the offense is just that terrible, and they played just as hard as when TT was the QB? It is inarguable that since Whaley the Bills have had shunned white QBs. I'm just pointing out the culture that has been bred. Kyle Orton, Jeff Tuel, and Nate Peterpan say hello.
JPP Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 6 minutes ago, Marv's Neighbor said: J-O-E-E, Web, Web, Web. LOL...good one...
Paulus Posted November 20, 2017 Posted November 20, 2017 8 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: Kyle Orton, Jeff Tuel, and Nate Peterpan say hello. I was just joking at Tibs. Though, it would be fun to point out how we ran Orton out of town. Benched Tuel after he outplayed EJ. And, had certain players sabotage Peterman's start. (Especially horrifying) Players need to be held accountable for playing like poop (looking at the especially poop like lines).
Recommended Posts