dayman Posted November 17, 2017 Posted November 17, 2017 Poisoned relationship in Indy. Coming of a season where he has a bad injury that is shrouded in mystery and potentially really bad long term for his shoulder. Perhaps a reasonable price is on his head (maybe only 1 1st or something). Lets get crazy. 1
Buffalo716 Posted November 17, 2017 Posted November 17, 2017 Just now, dayman said: Poisoned relationship in Indy. Coming of a season where he has a bad injury that is shrouded in mystery and potentially really bad long term for his shoulder. Perhaps a reasonable price is on his head (maybe only 1 1st or something). Lets get crazy. It would still take a kings ransom to pull Andrew Luck
LA Grant Posted November 17, 2017 Posted November 17, 2017 Oh just imagining all of the horrible pun headlines that would come from the Bills beat writers makes me NOT want this
McNubbins Posted November 17, 2017 Posted November 17, 2017 How about we take another look at Thad Lewis?
dayman Posted November 17, 2017 Author Posted November 17, 2017 1 minute ago, Buffalo716 said: It would still take a kings ransom to pull Andrew Luck Would it? Just b/c the owner is an insane opioid addict? I'm not seeing Luck pulling the same value it would take to move up to get a top 5 QB at this point...
Buffalo716 Posted November 17, 2017 Posted November 17, 2017 2 minutes ago, dayman said: Would it? Just b/c the owner is an insane opioid addict? I'm not seeing Luck pulling the same value it would take to move up to get a top 5 QB at this point... China doll Sam Bradford got traded for a first... Luck is worth atleast 2 firsts and a second minimum
dayman Posted November 17, 2017 Author Posted November 17, 2017 (edited) 1 minute ago, Buffalo716 said: China doll Sam Bradford got traded for a first... Luck is worth atleast 2 firsts and a second minimum ...speaking of China doll Sam Bradford...a 3 for him would be a steal and allow us to nab a little OL and defense help...also a good move. I still think fair value for Luck is at and all time bargain to buy low. There is no way he's worth what he was worth on draft day in terms of value swap...but he's likely worth more on the field if his shoulder is fine. The bottom line is packaging all of our picks to gamble on a 21 year old when we have so many needs is not viable. We need a Luck/Bradford or something similar. Edited November 17, 2017 by dayman
Luka Posted November 17, 2017 Posted November 17, 2017 More interested in whoever comes out of Minnesota. 1
BringBackOrton Posted November 17, 2017 Posted November 17, 2017 Depends on how the FO feels about the prospects coming out. I take Luck if they don't think any of the rookies are 50% prospects.
Heavy Kevi Posted November 17, 2017 Posted November 17, 2017 16 minutes ago, dayman said: Would it? Just b/c the owner is an insane opioid addict? I'm not seeing Luck pulling the same value it would take to move up to get a top 5 QB at this point... It would. Because of the market for him. There can be a ton of negatives, but there will be a bunch of teams in the bidding war. 13 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said: China doll Sam Bradford got traded for a first... Luck is worth atleast 2 firsts and a second minimum Let's say he ends up a Bill... My guess is a 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and Tyrod.
Jamie Muellers Ghost Posted November 17, 2017 Posted November 17, 2017 (edited) If they are going to stick to this offense, and Peterman is not the answer for next season I like the idea of Bridgewater health and price dependant of course. Edited November 17, 2017 by Jamie Muellers Ghost
Buffalo716 Posted November 17, 2017 Posted November 17, 2017 Just now, Shotgunner said: It would. Because of the market for him. There can be a ton of negatives, but there will be a bunch of teams in the bidding war. Let's say he ends up a Bill... My guess is a 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and Tyrod. That is a respectable deal
Heavy Kevi Posted November 17, 2017 Posted November 17, 2017 Just now, Buffalo716 said: That is a respectable deal I would be OK with it. Plus we still have the extra 1st and 2nd. We think we can motivate Luck, maybe they think they can do the same with Tyrod.
Green Lightning Posted November 17, 2017 Posted November 17, 2017 Never have been impressed by Luck. Let's play a few games and see what we have in NP. 1
dulles Posted November 17, 2017 Posted November 17, 2017 I'm not a big fan of taking QBs on the downward slope of their career. I think Luck is fading and I don't think he'd be inclined toward joining another team that has OLine issues.
SaviorPeterman Posted November 17, 2017 Posted November 17, 2017 No thanks on Luck, at this point NP has more upside and a higher ceiling. He's a very similar player to Luck anyway. 2
Buffalo716 Posted November 17, 2017 Posted November 17, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, SaviorPeterman said: No thanks on Luck, at this point NP has more upside and a higher ceiling. He's a very similar player to Luck anyway. You really must be smoking some good crack zero chance NP has more upside even if Luck is hurt. Edited November 17, 2017 by Buffalo716
dulles Posted November 17, 2017 Posted November 17, 2017 1 minute ago, SaviorPeterman said: No thanks on Luck, at this point NP has more upside and a higher ceiling. He's a very similar player to Luck anyway. I hope that NP is a little more careful with his body on the field.
Recommended Posts