row_33 Posted November 17, 2017 Posted November 17, 2017 It is what it is, a bit premature to me, but enjoy the ride.
Charles Romes Posted November 17, 2017 Posted November 17, 2017 On 11/15/2017 at 9:37 PM, BisonMan said: Kudos to The NFL Network for pointing today out that the last 5-4 team in a playoff hunt to replace their QB with a rookie was the Giants with Eli Manning replacing Kurt Warner (2004). Sure enough, they have Warner on the show to talk about it. Warner pointed out that that Giants team wasn't very good and "not a playoff team" and switching to the #1 pick at QB was an acknowledgement of the future (sound familiar?). Of course, Warner didn't point out that he was having the worst year of his career with 6 TDs, 4 INTs and a whopping 39 sacks (in 9 games!). He also had one of his lowest YPG of his career. Everyone assumed he was washed up after the 2 injury filled seasons before that. As it turns out, the offense wasn't aligned with his skills (see: Tyrod Taylor) and moving to AZ revived his career. Eli was horrible as his replacement with 6 TDs, 9 INTs and just 115 YPG. Let's hope Peterman is no Eli Manning...as a rookie. The funny thing is that if peterman puts up numbers way better than manning's this whole board will be screaming for his head including me.
papazoid Posted November 19, 2017 Posted November 19, 2017 On 11/17/2017 at 6:28 AM, papazoid said: going to Peterman is the right move... but expect more sacks and interceptions. I was half right
Recommended Posts