Jobot Posted November 15, 2017 Posted November 15, 2017 Ugh... potentially large blunder, although it would have been difficult to foresee from a fans perspective, but we could have gotten some decent draft picks if this was identified before the trade-deadline. No way that McD/B first incline that Tyrod is not the future of this organization just occurred today.... Unfortunate Could have gotten at least a 3rd or a player?
papazoid Posted November 15, 2017 Posted November 15, 2017 trade TT = officially tanking = no hope = no ticket sales = bad idea 1
Heavy Kevi Posted November 15, 2017 Posted November 15, 2017 We could have if another team wanted to. But I doubt they knew they would bemch him then. 5-2 is alot different that 5-4 with 2 crushing offense-less defeats in the rear view mirror. 2
The Now Moment Posted November 15, 2017 Posted November 15, 2017 The thing is, a new coaching staff bringing a new scheme should at least see what they have in a QB before ditching him to the curb. He could've played extremely well, unfortunately, it didn't pan out. But as a head coach, with a position like QB, you have to let him play and see what you have. Now that you know, you can move on. They still might be able to trade him for something, who knows. That's if that is the direction they want to go
BuffaloBillsGospel Posted November 15, 2017 Posted November 15, 2017 Link to where we were offered anything for him? Otherwise this is just more bs without any facts to back anything up. Who was giving up anything for Tyrod taylor when garrapolo was only traded for a 2nd, we probably at best could have received a 5th but that is just me talking out of my ass since I have no clue either.
Fallser Posted November 15, 2017 Posted November 15, 2017 9 minutes ago, Jobot said: Ugh... potentially large blunder, although it would have been difficult to foresee from a fans perspective, but we could have gotten some decent draft picks if this was identified before the trade-deadline. No way that McD/B first incline that Tyrod is not the future of this organization just occurred today.... Unfortunate Could have gotten at least a 3rd or a player? Yeah, we probably could HAVE received a 12th rounder for him...or maybe a box of Ace bandages...
Mat68 Posted November 15, 2017 Posted November 15, 2017 (edited) At 5-2 going into a primetime game vs an average opponent you don't trade the QB. The last few weeks the offense has been erratic to putrid. I like that Mcdermott made the change now instead of just conceding the season first before the move is made. Edited November 15, 2017 by Mat68
Big Gun Posted November 15, 2017 Posted November 15, 2017 10 minutes ago, Jobot said: Ugh... potentially large blunder, although it would have been difficult to foresee from a fans perspective, but we could have gotten some decent draft picks if this was identified before the trade-deadline. No way that McD/B first incline that Tyrod is not the future of this organization just occurred today.... Unfortunate Could have gotten at least a 3rd or a player? C'mon, there is absolutely zero market for Taylor. Rex Ryan is/was the only coach who wanted Taylor as his QB and not be a backup. Where is sexy Rexy now.
Doc Brown Posted November 15, 2017 Posted November 15, 2017 So, at 5-2 with the offense looking like it's finally clicking on all cylinders we should of traded Tyrod? The players and fans would've had their pitch forks out. 1
K D Posted November 15, 2017 Posted November 15, 2017 Trade Tyrod and Dareus to Jax for Ramsey was my suggestion back in Sept
BillsfanAZ Posted November 15, 2017 Posted November 15, 2017 Why would the Bills trade Taylor when they had a good record at the trade deadline? Also the Bills only have two viable QB's, why trade one of them away? Injuries happen. 1
Perk71 Posted November 15, 2017 Posted November 15, 2017 24 minutes ago, BillsfanAZ said: Why would the Bills trade Taylor when they had a good record at the trade deadline? Also the Bills only have two viable QB's, why trade one of them away? Injuries happen. Yep
MAJBobby Posted November 15, 2017 Posted November 15, 2017 Couple things 1. How do we know they didnt try? 2. Need to have a BU QB dont ya?
quinnearlysghost88 Posted November 15, 2017 Posted November 15, 2017 you're completely and utterly wrong. it's 'could have'.
BillsFan4 Posted November 15, 2017 Posted November 15, 2017 (edited) They still can trade Tyrod. He signed a 2 year deal. So he is still under contract next year. Lets not jump jump the gum here anyway. Peterman hasn't even started a game yet. I hope like crazy that Peterman grabs the starting role, does great and never looks back. But Tyrod starting again is not an impossible scenario as of right now. Plus, IMO it would have been a pretty dirty move to renegotiate his contract and then immediately trade him afterwards... and I don't think anyone was trading for him when he had that 5 year $90M (or whatever it was) contract extension. It was the right move bringing Tyrod back on that renegotiated contract. Who else did the Bills have on the roster at the time? Nobody... Edited November 16, 2017 by BillsFan4
ProcessTheTrust Posted November 15, 2017 Posted November 15, 2017 Sure, they could HAVE, but it makes sense that didn't. McD didn't put the C on Tyrod's jersey, the team voted for him. McD respected that and believed that if he could just take a tiny step forward, it could work. And Tyrod seemingly took that step at times, but the past 2 weeks showed it's not consistent. Either way, it's not that big of a deal. Not like we're hurting for draft picks. It was worth trying to see if Tyrod could do it. He couldn't. Moving on!
The Now Moment Posted November 15, 2017 Posted November 15, 2017 At the time it didn't make sense to do that, it's easy to say coulda woulda shoulda after the fact.
nedboy7 Posted November 15, 2017 Posted November 15, 2017 If you can’t form a sentence correctly how can we trust anything else you have to say
PABillsfan23 Posted November 15, 2017 Posted November 15, 2017 Thank god.. The end of Tyrod Taylor. ??
Recommended Posts