Jump to content

Nathan Peterman to Start this Week.


26CornerBlitz

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

....Savage got benched for Watson......Glennon for Tribusky........37 different QB benchings in Cleveland......Hoyer for Bethard.......BUT....ONLY Buffalo is "committing the cardinal sin of coaching"....go figure......

 

I was thinking of the whole package with Sammy, Dareus, Darby, etc. Not just the QB.  These guys don’t worry about anything other than what they think. Refreshing, and I hope it works! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

I was thinking of the whole package with Sammy, Dareus, Darby, etc. Not just the QB.  These guys don’t worry about anything other than what they think. Refreshing, and I hope it works! 

 

...c'mon Augie, Grandma ALWAYS said, "no guts no glory...no bawls no blue chips sonny".......she was NEVER wrong, the old coot......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BUFFALOBART said:

I'd be happy to be proven wrong. Odds are, that after there is a couple of games worth of tape, the same fans clamoring for Peterman, will be calling for his head.

That's the way of  a fan base. I hope Peterman does well, if he doesn't, don't let the nasty Crusaders off the hook. They put most of us through enough grief and ridiculous arguing.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

...c'mon Augie, Grandma ALWAYS said, "no guts no glory...no bawls no blue chips sonny".......she was NEVER wrong, the old coot......

 

I never said it was wrong! Just that they’re ballsy! I hope it all works. I’ve been a supporter for almost everything. (OK, don’t come back with a ballsy supporter comment, please?) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, simool said:

 

I keep hearing this 5th round rookie bs... Ask New England how that worked out for them... Brady was a 6th round, 2nd year QB, who had gone 1/3 the previous year.

Thats 1 completeion and 3 attempts FYI

 

Careful. Some posters here think this means you are saying Peterman is 100% the next Brady without question.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Augie said:

 

I never said it was wrong! Just that they’re ballsy! I hope it all works. I’ve been a supporter for almost everything. (OK, don’t come back with a ballsy supporter comment, please?) 

 

...Grandma was a "supporter" as well....she wore it proudly.............:o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Finkle Is Einhorn said:

 The Kelvin Benjamin trade all the sudden makes sense now....

 

Honestly, I thought it made a TON of sense from the beginning. Cheap for a guy of that caliber if you believe in extending him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, dgrochester55 said:

This is not a good comparision.   Brady is ONE example of this in 30 years.    There are dozens of inexperienced late round rookie quarterbacks that aren't ready.  Brett Hundley, Bryce Petty, Matt Flynn, and that is off the top of my head, how many have been forgotten?

 

Different scenario, in early 2001 the Patriots were not supposed to contend.   Brady started out of sheer necessity when Bledsoe and their backup at the time(Huard) both got hurt.   They were not a contending team, they were not 5-4 with a healthy starter.   

 

The benching would make sense if there was a 1st or 2nd round pick waiting in the wings or even if you had a veteran like Glennon or Hoyer and wanted to give the team a spark.   Just because you have a second quarterback on the roster does not mean that they area a lock to be any better.   I support Peterman now and will be cheering for him on Sunday.  , I hope I am wrong and that he does well, I just see it as more likely to be a disaster than not. 

 

Deaft position is completely meaningless. My belief is that on Day 1 of the NFL season every rookie is equal. Peterman has performed better than #2 overall pick Mitch Trubisky so far, although we’ll see if that sticks with real game time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Finkle Is Einhorn said:

 The Kelvin Benjamin trade all the sudden makes sense now....

I think the fact that TT only had one completion to KB may have factored into the decision.  They went and got their shiny new toy, and TT didn't want to play with it.

 

It's all fun and games until Peterman gets smacked around a few times.  I wonder if he will be able to hold up if it gets rough.  I think it makes sense to find out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well we know Tyrod wasn't going to win this game and at least I feel a little better about this game since Lynn doesnt know Peterman like he knows Tyrod. I feel we at least have a chance at a win now. We might not win but we also might win, it's better to have a chance With Peterman then a solid loss with Tyrod because it's a road game and Lynn.

 

Fingers crossed the team gets behind Peterman and pulls out a win. Eitherway it is so nice to know this new staff is moving on from the last staffs QB the most important position in football.  McD scores some big brownie points from me I was getting really worried about this team sticking with Tyrod like Chan did with Fitz.

 

Today is a great day for a new era to truly start, goodbye Rex and the Rex not good enough QB.

 

Go Peterman, GO BILLS

Edited by xRUSHx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

Must've been watching a different game. 

 

Taylor was in no way bad in that Jets game.

 

He had one absolute stinker and is getting pulled for it.... this is what McBeane and company have wanted all along.

 

Tyrods getting a raw deal.

 

 

Raw deal ??????

 

He can't pass footballs to receivers and he is a qb.

 

What in the world.          

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...