Chicken Boo Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 On 11/12/2017 at 8:53 PM, Brianmoorman4jesus said: Tyrod is starting, so the Chargers will stack the box and take McCoy out. We will punt on almost every possession and get embarrassed in front of the 238 people in the stands. It’s not to late to grow a pair of stones and name Peterman the starter. Give the fans something to actually look forward to and maybe save the season. Start Peterman or watch 5-2 go to 5-7. Tyrod has been figured out. I share your pain amd agree 100%, but McDermott won't make the switch until it's too late. Right now, Sean's going to be defensive, feeling like the fans and media think they know better than he, the head coach. If McDermott is to bench Taylor, his ego won't allow the decision to be made under pressure from outsiders. It has to be of his own "perceived" volition. So expect it to happen 3 weeks too late, after 5 straight losses and our playoff hopes dashed. Then we'll hear Sean rattle off the standard, "I did what was in the best interest of the team" "Tyrod gave us the best chance to win" b.s. On a side note, who here thinks Belichick WOULDN'T make the switch after Tyrod's last 2 outings?
26CornerBlitz Posted November 14, 2017 Author Posted November 14, 2017 2 hours ago, Chicken Boo said: I share your pain amd agree 100%, but McDermott won't make the switch until it's too late. Right now, Sean's going to be defensive, feeling like the fans and media think they know better than he, the head coach. If McDermott is to bench Taylor, his ego won't allow the decision to be made under pressure from outsiders. It has to be of his own "perceived" volition. So expect it to happen 3 weeks too late, after 5 straight losses and our playoff hopes dashed. Then we'll hear Sean rattle off the standard, "I did what was in the best interest of the team" "Tyrod gave us the best chance to win" b.s. On a side note, who here thinks Belichick WOULDN'T make the switch after Tyrod's last 2 outings? What a bunch of nonsense thinking the coach is factoring fan sentiment in his decision making process. It's laughable. 1
CommonCents Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 (edited) The Bills started this season hot by creating turnovers. They have since dried up. I'm calling for McBeane to go out and get s turnover chain to save the season, it starts Sunday in LA. Edited November 14, 2017 by Commonsense 1
Chicken Boo Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 1 hour ago, 26CornerBlitz said: What a bunch of nonsense thinking the coach is factoring fan sentiment in his decision making process. It's laughable. Continue to laugh as the slide continues, the chorus grows louder and McDermott remains stubborn.
26CornerBlitz Posted November 14, 2017 Author Posted November 14, 2017 2 minutes ago, Chicken Boo said: Continue to laugh as the slide continues, the chorus grows louder and McDermott remains stubborn. Yes. He should listen to fans. Gotcha. 1
Chicken Boo Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 Just now, 26CornerBlitz said: Yes. He should listen to fans. Gotcha. My point was that, McDermott will be hearing it from EVERYONE and his ego will not allow him to make the necessary change. Really not that hard to comprehend.
26CornerBlitz Posted November 14, 2017 Author Posted November 14, 2017 (edited) 1 minute ago, Chicken Boo said: My point was that, McDermott will be hearing it from EVERYONE and his ego will not allow him to make the necessary change. Really not that hard to comprehend. It's easy to comprehend and it doesn't mean anything because coaches don't give a crap about what fans think should happen so his ego has nothing to do with that. Edited November 14, 2017 by 26CornerBlitz 1
Chicken Boo Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 3 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said: It's easy to comprehend and it doesn't mean anything because coaches don't give a crap about what fans think should happen so his ego has nothing to do with that. He doesn't have to care what we think. We're right, he (so far) is wrong. He'll reach that conclusion in due time.
26CornerBlitz Posted November 14, 2017 Author Posted November 14, 2017 Just now, Chicken Boo said: He doesn't have to care what we think. We're right, he (so far) is wrong. He'll reach that conclusion in due time. Okay. Sure.
DCBongo Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 Lets be real, Belichick would not have benched Bledsoe for Brady if Bledsoe was healthy. By the time Bledsoe was Brady was showing his skill and Belickick has no choice. I do not blame McD for sticking with Tyrod. It is what coaches do and do anything less would hurt his credibility with the team. But to be stubborn about it would be wrong too. I would think he keeps Tyrod on a short leash Sunday. If the Bills cannot get the offense moving after at least the 1st quarter, I would expect him to insert Peterman for a series or two. If he does well, you keep him going. If he gets the game result, you pull him out and put Tyrod back in. Peterman gets valuable experience without throwing him to the wolves; and Tyrod gets some time on the bench to hopefully smolder. I said this in another post, if the Bills lose and go to 5-5 any dreams of the playoffs are going to be figuratively lost. They traded for Benjamin, they gave the signal they want to win now. McD shuffles in players all game without regard to "starters"; why shouldn't he hold the same philosophy for the QB?
CanadianFan Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 (edited) We're going against 2 of the league's TOP edge rushers. Edited November 14, 2017 by CanadianFan
26CornerBlitz Posted November 14, 2017 Author Posted November 14, 2017 56 minutes ago, DCBongo said: Lets be real, Belichick would not have benched Bledsoe for Brady if Bledsoe was healthy. By the time Bledsoe was Brady was showing his skill and Belickick has no choice. I do not blame McD for sticking with Tyrod. It is what coaches do and do anything less would hurt his credibility with the team. But to be stubborn about it would be wrong too. I would think he keeps Tyrod on a short leash Sunday. If the Bills cannot get the offense moving after at least the 1st quarter, I would expect him to insert Peterman for a series or two. If he does well, you keep him going. If he gets the game result, you pull him out and put Tyrod back in. Peterman gets valuable experience without throwing him to the wolves; and Tyrod gets some time on the bench to hopefully smolder. I said this in another post, if the Bills lose and go to 5-5 any dreams of the playoffs are going to be figuratively lost. They traded for Benjamin, they gave the signal they want to win now. McD shuffles in players all game without regard to "starters"; why shouldn't he hold the same philosophy for the QB? Because he doesn't want to follow the example of the Cleveland Clowns. 1
JM2009 Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 9 minutes ago, CanadianFan said: We're going against 2 of the league's edge rushers. 3-6 and no Rivers more than likely. But who knows. This the game for the season.
Stank_Nasty Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 1 minute ago, JM2009 said: 3-6 and no Rivers more than likely. But who knows. This the game for the season. I have a real hard time believing the wily vet isn't gonna make his way through the protocol.
CanadianFan Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 1 minute ago, JM2009 said: 3-6 and no Rivers more than likely. But who knows. This the game for the season. IKR. Looking at their record, and without Rivers, we're lucky to be in this position to win this game. Yet, it won't be an easy game. The rest of the team is legit. And they were rounding into form. They played Jags tough man. They almost won if not for that stupid pick by Rivers.
Stank_Nasty Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 (edited) 4 minutes ago, CanadianFan said: IKR. Looking at their record, and without Rivers, we're lucky to be in this position to win this game. Yet, it won't be an easy game. The rest of the team is legit. And they were rounding into form. They played Jags tough man. They almost won if not for that stupid pick by Rivers. i'm usually quite the optimist but if you look back on the last 2 games its no far fetched to think we still get handled even with clemons trotting out for them. they can pressure the qb and have 2 very capable dual threats at rb. a solid recipe for the loss right there. Edited November 14, 2017 by Stank_Nasty
CanadianFan Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 2 minutes ago, Stank_Nasty said: i'm usually quite the optimist but if you look back on the last 2 games its no far fetched to think we still get handled even with clemons trotting out for them. they can pressure the qb and have 2 very capable dual threats at rb. I agree. Only two reasons why we might have a chance - the drubbing we took last sunday SHOULD bring out the best in players and coaches, and Rivers not playing. Clemons is a dinker and we'll take that all day.
JM2009 Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 10 minutes ago, CanadianFan said: IKR. Looking at their record, and without Rivers, we're lucky to be in this position to win this game. Yet, it won't be an easy game. The rest of the team is legit. And they were rounding into form. They played Jags tough man. They almost won if not for that stupid pick by Rivers. True, but they have no home field edge. There could be more Bills fans there. 1
Stank_Nasty Posted November 14, 2017 Posted November 14, 2017 1 minute ago, CanadianFan said: I agree. Only two reasons why we might have a chance - the drubbing we took last sunday SHOULD bring out the best in players and coaches, and Rivers not playing. Clemons is a dinker and we'll take that all day. I don't disagree but he honestly may not have to throw more than 10-15 balls. I don't think I've ever seen such a horrid 2 game stretch in run defense. 1
Recommended Posts