Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I admit the D-line is worse, and of course has less depth without him. However, in the long run I think they are better off without him and his contract. Still happy with the move in the long run.

Posted (edited)

2 weeks in a row Jax Run D has played great when being last in the league (Pre Dareus) giving up less than 100 total yards in 2 games combined (Post Dareus).

 

What changed? What's funny, I was told that good DT's are not needed and that having a anchor in the middle of the D-line controlling running lane gaps was a waste of money.

 

SMH

Edited by Real McCoy
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Apologize because he is a lazy, fat piece of **** that is a toke away from a long term suspension?

 

Get over yourself.

 

Edited by Binghamton Beast
Posted
2 minutes ago, CanadianFan said:

Apologize now, if you didn't you know-nothing haters. Your bile makes this fandom toxic. Worse than Chernobyl.

 

No... and stay on your side of the border. You are obviously smoking some strong s*%t. He was the most overpaid piece of garbage we've had in years!!!!

Posted
Just now, Binghamton Beast said:

Apologize because he is a lazy, fat piece of **** that is a time away from a long term suspension?

 

Get over yourself.

 

 

 

I swear I saw this post verbatim with the marshawn trade. Might’ve even said it myself. Oops.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, CanadianFan said:

Apologize now, if you didn't you know-nothing haters. Your bile makes this fandom toxic. Worse than Chernobyl.

No team would take Dareus all year.  The Jags gave a throwaway pick for him.  If the Bills were wrong about Dareus, so were 31 other teams.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, jmc12290 said:

No team would take Dareus all year.  The Jags gave a throwaway pick for him.  If the Bills were wrong about Dareus, so were 31 other teams.

 

 

How did the Run Defense look with Dareus?

 

Isnt that more important in a playoff fighting year over a 6th that you could have gotten in the offseason after this year anyway?

Posted (edited)

Dareus had to go..

Who to blame? Blame the prior horrible GM who gave him so much money that there was no other choice going forward, and that was Doug Whaley. 

Edited by George C
Posted
Just now, MAJBobby said:

 

 

How did the Run Defense look with Dareus?

 

Isnt that more important in a playoff fighting year over a 6th that you could have gotten in the offseason after this year anyway?

One good game and two bad games.

 

Again, if Dareus is such a valuable piece, why did we only get a conditional sixth from the Jags and no sniffs from any other team?

Posted
1 minute ago, jmc12290 said:

One good game and two bad games.

 

Again, if Dareus is such a valuable piece, why did we only get a conditional sixth from the Jags and no sniffs from any other team?

 

Again why make a conditional 6th round pick trade in a season you are fighing for playoffs. 

 

 

Posted (edited)

I'd rather have a D-line that gives up less than 300/yards per game rushing than the 6th round pick and $2mil in cap savings we get next year from cutting Dareus.  Even if that would've meant some sort of dead cap hit in 2019.  

 

But that's why I just watch the games and Beane gets paid the big $$ to make the games unwatchable..

 

 

Edited by Adam727
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
Just now, MAJBobby said:

 

Again why make a conditional 6th round pick trade in a season you are fighing for playoffs. 

 

 

Maybe he was being an idiot and dragging down the locker room.  

 

We aren't fighting for the playoffs anymore.

Edited by jmc12290
×
×
  • Create New...