Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Buffalo30 said:

I'd rather wait and start him against a team like Indy so he can catch up to game speed against a bad team

 

Why put him in now. Get the most reps and tape and see if you want to hang your hat on him next year (would be the wrong move should draft a QB early still no matter what)

1 minute ago, Watkins101 said:

You have a proven vet, who the team elected as a CAPTAIN is suddenly reduced to a clipboard holder. It could create division between supporters of the desicision and those against it. This could create large tension

 

But your Process. So again is that smoke and mirrors or true accountability. And by proven you mean what AVG at best and not good enough for a long term run?

Edited by MAJBobby
Posted
Just now, Watkins101 said:

The reason I would not start him is it could ruin the locker room

Yeah, it really depends on what the situation is like there.

 

From the comments in the preseason, it seems like the players really like Peterman, though.

 

The players know how it is in the NFL. As long as the move makes sense to them, they won't turn on the coach. So, if the staff makes this decision now, they need to get the players to buy in first. That may take a couple weeks of extra campaigning.

Posted

Another blow out next week. Our offense is terrible on the road already and the chargers can stop our run. Mcd says Tyrod is the starter. Wish I had it in me to just not watch. I knew this guy wouldn’t even consider Peterman. To easy to just keep running the same trash out there.

Posted

The look on Matthews face lets me know it might be a change at Qb. Someone said a change will ruin the team, I think the team is lost already. We really need a spark, teams have figured out TT unfortunately.

Posted
2 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

 

Why put him in now. Get the most reps and tape and see if you want to hang your hat on him next year (would be the wrong move should draft a QB early still no matter what)

 

But your Process. So again is that smoke and mirrors or true accountability. And by proven you mean what AVG at best and not good enough for a long term run?

Proven that he is good enough to play in the NFL and win games

Posted
Just now, billsherd said:

Taylor is the QB as per the coach. 

 

Of course he is Taylor is the perfect coach for a defensive minded coach. 

 

Just not good enough

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Watkins101 said:

The reason I would not start him is it could ruin the locker room

 

The receivers would probably be doing backflips if Peterman was named starter. They'd know that they would probably be getting more passes thrown their way.  TT refuses to throw to them.

 

Unfortunately, McD said TT is still the starter.

Edited by suorangefan4
Posted
Just now, Watkins101 said:

Proven that he is good enough to play in the NFL and win games

 

Which means what???  How many games has he won on his own without the defense playing lights out etc etc 

 

he is like a Rookie that has been in the league and started a ton now 

Posted

This team has been downright awful the last two weeks, maybe starting Peterman could bring a spark.............

 

but McDermott wouldn't have the balls in a million years to do it. If I was the HC I would CERTAINLY do it. Taylor is not the answer and WE ALL KNOW IT.

Posted
Just now, wppete said:

Peterman has to start. 

 

He is not going to until Bills mathmatically eliminated Taylor is a perfect QB for the defensive minded McD

Posted
7 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

 

Why put him in now. Get the most reps and tape and see if you want to hang your hat on him next year (would be the wrong move should draft a QB early still no matter what)

 

I honestly can't watch another 100 yard game for Tyrod so, let's do it.  Have him practice with the 1s this week.  

×
×
  • Create New...