Maine-iac Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 Screw it start Peterman ........... can we get our defense back also?
NoSaint Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 At least peterman got s confidence booster but it was otherwise not meaningful in evaluating him
Big Turk Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 I don't care about the defense playing soft and backups, Peterman just did more on that last drive than Tyrod did all day. He needs to be starting from here on out. WE already know what Tyrod is and he isn't good enough.
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 Put him back on the bench next week though so we can watch every !@#$ing defense stifle our run game while Tyrod does nothing to discourage the loaded boxes 1
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 The difference between a QB, and a RB at QB.
Chicken Boo Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 5 minutes ago, Badanswer said: oh wow we do have receivers Who knew?
MiltonWaddams Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 Just now, SaviorPeterman said: PETERMAN!! Excuse me for a few minutes while I go jizz in my pants. (kidding...or am I?) Validation must be a beautiful thing
DriveFor1Outta5 Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 1 minute ago, par73 said: It looks nice, but Saints are playing soft. They weren’t playing soft when TT was down 30-3?
K-9 Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 Shoulda gone for 2 to make it a 5 possession game.
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 I think people will just blitz him. Our line sucks and he is inaccurate under pressure... so we'll see I guess
Fadingpain Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 Just now, NoSaint said: At least peterman got s confidence booster but it was otherwise not meaningful in evaluating him Disagree; look at the nut and bolt mechanics of how he quarterbacks. There is a lot you can evaluate there.
The Now Moment Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 1 minute ago, Billznut said: If the coaching staff plays Peterman next week and from now on and he does well, it makes the coaching staff look idiotic for keeping him on the bench. They will NEVER start him this year. Or they could be given credit for waiting until he was ready to start? You can spin it either way
gr8billsfan Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 17 minutes ago, BuffaloBill said: But..but Tyrod is a franchise QB Oh yeah for sure lol. Peterman already doing better with less time in the game. 16 more yds thrown lol
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 Just now, DollaBills said: Is there a QB controversy or no We aren’t smart enough to play the QB that is looking to pass. We will keep playing the guy that doesn’t even look at receivers
BringBackOrton Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 1 minute ago, NoSaint said: At least peterman got s confidence booster but it was otherwise not meaningful in evaluating him I actually disagree. He pushed the ball downfield. He didn't throw a checkdown on 3rd and 12. That's enough for me at this juncture.
Bills Fan of St Augustine Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 1 minute ago, Maine-iac said: Screw it start Peterman ........... can we get our defense back also? We can, if Peterman can play both ways...maybe at LB?
Chicken Boo Posted November 12, 2017 Posted November 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, Fadingpain said: HEY! PETERMAN! Garbabe time? Of course! Soft prevent defense? Of course! Peterman still obviously better than Tyrod? OF COURSE! Give up. Tyrod is awful. There's no excusing it.
Recommended Posts