The juice Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 Hope Sean McDermott’s reading this. Can’t have a linebacker covering kamara or he’s gonn eat us all day
Buffalo716 Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 You can put a safety on him but that will stress our secondary too much our safeties are the reason we have given up few big passing plays and putting a safety on kamara will open up downfield throws in our zone heavy scheme I would think bracket covering him inside/outside would be the way to go
Andrew Son Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 I think we will see a bunch of Milano this week
Royale with Cheese Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 On 11/10/2017 at 9:02 PM, Buffalo716 said: You can put a safety on him but that will stress our secondary too much our safeties are the reason we have given up few big passing plays and putting a safety on kamara will open up downfield throws in our zone heavy scheme I would think bracket covering him inside/outside would be the way to go Expand I was going to say something similar to this. So if we did put a safety on him, we would have to run a Cover 1 most of the day?
quinnearlysghost88 Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 Yeah, we're 20th against RBs coming out of the backfield. No bueno.
bobobonators Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 On 11/10/2017 at 9:04 PM, Royale with Cheese said: I was going to say something similar to this. So if we did put a safety on him, we would have to run a Cover 1 most of the day? Expand Im sure brees would love that. This week is going to come down to two simple things: 1. How are defense performs in the red zone. 2. Who wins the turnover battle. I have no illusions that our defense is going to shut down Brees. I feel Brees is going to carve up our D between the 20’s. How our defense holds up once the Saints get into the redzone will be the major deciding factor in this game. And of course, turnovers. We cant lose the turnover battle vs Brees. Simple as that really.
CommonCents Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 (edited) I don't know what McD will do with Kamara, I'd suggest going full blown Tonya Harding. Edited November 10, 2017 by Commonsense
Royale with Cheese Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 On 11/10/2017 at 9:09 PM, bobobonators said: Im sure brees would love that. This week is going to come down to two simple things: 1. How are defense performs in the red zone. 2. Who wins the turnover battle. I have no illusions that our defense is going to shut down Brees. I feel Brees is going to carve up our D between the 20’s. How our defense holds up once the Saints get into the redzone will be the major deciding factor in this game. And of course, turnovers. We cant lose the turnover battle vs Brees. Simple as that really. Expand Yeah there's no way I would run a Cover 1 against Brees....it would be like what Fitz did to us last TNF in week 2. I agree with both 1 and 2. Brees will get his 300+.....if we hold them to FG's, we probably win. If they're touchdowns....our Sunday is ruined.
bobobonators Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 On 11/10/2017 at 9:13 PM, Royale with Cheese said: Yeah there's no way I would run a Cover 1 against Brees....it would be like what Fitz did to us last TNF in week 2. I agree with both 1 and 2. Brees will get his 300+.....if we hold them to FG's, we probably win. If they're touchdowns....our Sunday is ruined. Expand Yup. If we can hold at least 2 of their drives in the red zone to 3 points as opposed to TD’s thatll be the difference between them scoring 20-25 on us and them scoring 28-33 on us; and most certainly the difference between a W/L
BillsFan130 Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 Just anyone but Preston Brown or Lorax. If I find out Preston Brown is covering him, I will trade my whole fantasy team if necessary to get Kamara...
Buffalo716 Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 (edited) On 11/10/2017 at 9:04 PM, Royale with Cheese said: I was going to say something similar to this. So if we did put a safety on him, we would have to run a Cover 1 most of the day? Expand There would be a few ways you could do it. Cover 1 would be one of those ways. i would think a big dime set with a safety moved down to WLB in cover 2 man would Alleviate some of the stress on the secondary keeping 2 safeties high while having a safety on kamara but we would need really sticky man coverage because Brees makes quick decisions so I don't like those options Edited November 10, 2017 by Buffalo716
YoloinOhio Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 (edited) Donald Washington said today to expect Hyde on Kamara. Not sure who he talked to or what he saw in practice. Edited November 10, 2017 by YoloinOhio
Buffalo716 Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 On 11/10/2017 at 9:27 PM, YoloinOhio said: Donald Washington said today to expect Hyde on Kamara Expand Good old Donald Washington!
YoloinOhio Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 On 11/10/2017 at 9:29 PM, Buffalo716 said: Good old Donald Washington! Expand He said it in a way like he knew that was the game plan. And I have to say I like it. Micah Hyde is a stud.
Buffalo716 Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 On 11/10/2017 at 9:30 PM, YoloinOhio said: He said it in a way like he knew that was the game plan. And I have to say I like it. Micah Hyde is a stud. Expand Micah is absolutely a stud but if he's covering a back all game he won't be near all those tipped balls in the middle of the field but I'm sure he would be excellent on him
BearNorth Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 If this is true why aren't we running the same sets with Shady? He's an even tougher matchup out of the backfield.
Buffalo716 Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 On 11/10/2017 at 9:37 PM, BearNorth said: If this is true why aren't we running the same sets with Shady? He's an even tougher matchup out of the backfield. Expand Shady is leading our team in receptions He catches a lot of balls for us
The Now Moment Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 I think this is something we need. A safety that can play in the box. Carolina drafted Shaq Thompson a few years ago to be that in the box safety that can cover runningbacks and tight ends. On 11/10/2017 at 9:31 PM, Buffalo716 said: Micah is absolutely a stud but if he's covering a back all game he won't be near all those tipped balls in the middle of the field but I'm sure he would be excellent on him Expand You're absolutely right, keep him where he does best...playing that free safety playmaking position
CommonCents Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 On 11/10/2017 at 9:37 PM, BearNorth said: If this is true why aren't we running the same sets with Shady? He's an even tougher matchup out of the backfield. Expand Kamara is heavily involved in the passing games. Option routes, split wide, etc. I'd guess our passing game is not that complex. 1
quinnearlysghost88 Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 On 11/10/2017 at 9:41 PM, Buffalo716 said: Shady is leading our team in receptions He catches a lot of balls for us Expand I feel like this is true, but i also feel like most of the balls he catches are at or near the line of scrimmage.
Recommended Posts