boyst Posted December 7, 2017 Posted December 7, 2017 23 hours ago, Nanker said: Yep. He'll re-sign tomorrow. Meaning once he's out of the Senate he'll re-up with SNL. He'll be a big draw. Oh god no. No!
ALF Posted December 7, 2017 Author Posted December 7, 2017 23 hours ago, Nanker said: Yep. He'll re-sign tomorrow. Meaning once he's out of the Senate he'll re-up with SNL. He'll be a big draw. He's 66 , very rich , Senate pension , time to retire .
TH3 Posted December 7, 2017 Posted December 7, 2017 On 12/6/2017 at 10:44 AM, row_33 said: most conservatives voters have learned to never tell polls what they will do on election day, has taken a few decades to convince most of us we just tend our garden, get 14 year olds drunk, raise families, grab women by the kitty, do our job, go to church, stalk young girls at the mall, and silently show up and destroy polls on Election Day this only works for close races, if its a no-brainer result (Obama twice, Reagan twice) then it's not in effect. .
TakeYouToTasker Posted December 7, 2017 Posted December 7, 2017 2 minutes ago, baskin said: . Did you add "get 14 year olds drunk", "grab women by the kitty", and "stalk young girls at the mall" because those are the things that you yourself used to do back when you were a conservative? 2
row_33 Posted December 7, 2017 Posted December 7, 2017 1 hour ago, ALF said: He's 66 , very rich , Senate pension , time to retire . are you sure about his immense wealth?
ALF Posted December 7, 2017 Author Posted December 7, 2017 20 minutes ago, row_33 said: are you sure about his immense wealth? Add in SS and Medicare from high salary career , oh yes.
row_33 Posted December 8, 2017 Posted December 8, 2017 True, forgot about his old age pension dont you you claw it back in the US if you made more than $10,000 like Canada?
OCinBuffalo Posted December 8, 2017 Posted December 8, 2017 (edited) I'm reeling...reeling...reeling. It's like the people who predicted 4-12 for the Bills, giving me **** after they won 5 games....then saw fit to predict 5-11. Reeling. I'm reeling because Trump is doing as promised: winning, on everything. Did you see Chucky Schumer's face today? After he was so "courageous" by missing the last meeting with Trump, because he was TweetHurt, there he is today meeting with Trump, hat in hand, with a gooney-googoo **** eating grin Reeling. Yeah. Roy Moore is going to win(end of thread), just like Trump is going to win...2018, 2020. The only reeling that is going on: how many fish can the dopey MSM get to buy their product before the entire thing falls apart? They left is in full Tony Robbins mode: ignore everything they ever did, and focus on today. Except today, they are going to do brand new stupid things to lose elections. Edited December 8, 2017 by OCinBuffalo
Cugalabanza Posted December 8, 2017 Posted December 8, 2017 All I have to say on this whole topic is the following: Alabama. Wow!
DC Tom Posted December 8, 2017 Posted December 8, 2017 45 minutes ago, Cugalabanza said: All I have to say on this whole topic is the following: Alabama. Wow! I'd have gone with "Forget it, Jake. It's Alabama." Yours is a little too Fantasy Island-ish. But I have rather severe problems with anyone, be it Moore or Franken, suffering punishment on the basis of allegations alone.
Nanker Posted December 8, 2017 Posted December 8, 2017 Wonder if Huma will ever accuse Hillary of sexual misconduct and inappropriate touching.
Cugalabanza Posted December 8, 2017 Posted December 8, 2017 Just now, DC Tom said: I'd have gone with "Forget it, Jake. It's Alabama." Yours is a little too Fantasy Island-ish. But I have rather severe problems with anyone, be it Moore or Franken, suffering punishment on the basis of allegations alone. I wasn't even focusing on the allegations. I'm just thinking of the rich tapestry that is Roy Moore.
DC Tom Posted December 8, 2017 Posted December 8, 2017 He's a mere fragment of the rich tapestry that is Alabama.
row_33 Posted December 8, 2017 Posted December 8, 2017 Takes quite the cat to continue in the face of allegations, a consistent denial is a good strategy if its true
B-Man Posted December 8, 2017 Posted December 8, 2017 This Falsehood was pretty obvious to anyone who wasn't blind or "reeling" The BIG QUESTION is WHEN AND WHY? More details here, but we haven’t yet seen the full money quote. .
row_33 Posted December 8, 2017 Posted December 8, 2017 I suspend judgement on a man accused of something decades ago with no real proof and he consistently denies it. When I can bother to care about the situation in the first place.
B-Man Posted December 8, 2017 Posted December 8, 2017 (edited) I agree with Tom and Row, he should be judged innocent until there are actual charges and conviction, not 40 year old accusations. Too bad he is such a buffoon also. . Edited December 8, 2017 by B-Man
row_33 Posted December 8, 2017 Posted December 8, 2017 If you don't have a decent religious or moral foundation you make up rules on the fly and change them at whim and insist everyone else has to obey them, especially your enemies, ladies and gentlemen.... your 2017 Democratic Party!!! and it backfires horribly..... very entertaining though....
3rdnlng Posted December 8, 2017 Posted December 8, 2017 http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/beverly-nelson-roy-moore/ What are we going to find out next, that the Duke lacrosse team was innocent?
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted December 8, 2017 Posted December 8, 2017 3 hours ago, B-Man said: I agree with Tom and Row, he should be judged innocent until there are actual charges and conviction, not 40 year old accusations. Too bad he is such a buffoon also. . So would you actually vote for him???
Recommended Posts