CanadianFan Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 https://mobile.twitter.com/NFLMatchup/status/927967270172807169 Visually, Tyrod's QB play has improved this season (I wish we use him more as a running threat). This twitter confirms it. The credit here goes to Rick Dennison IMO. I've been critical of lack of creativity of his scheme, and lack of imagination in play-calling. BUT he has improved Tyrod's QB play. It is also worth noting that Trevor Siemian has fallen off the cliff without Rick Dennison. Now if he can just incorporate a quarter of the schemes from last two year's offenses, we'd be in a very shape. (Of course, we're also missing that awesome O line coach Kromer, who's transformed Rams' O-line, but I digress.) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo716 Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 7 minutes ago, CanadianFan said: https://mobile.twitter.com/NFLMatchup/status/927967270172807169 Visually, Tyrod's QB play has improved this season (I wish we use him more as a running threat). This twitter confirms it. The credit here goes to Rick Dennison IMO. I've been critical of lack of creativity of his scheme, and lack of imagination in play-calling. BUT he has improved Tyrod's QB play. It is also worth noting that Trevor Siemian has fallen off the cliff without Rick Dennison. Now if he can just incorporate a quarter of the schemes from last two year's offenses, we'd be in a very shape. (Of course, we're also missing that awesome O line coach Kromer, who's transformed Rams' O-line, but I digress.) Its tough because cordy has been playing hurt all year not to mention the right side of the line are premium members of the Sunday sack giveaway and are leading contributors to the cause Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hondo in seattle Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 This is a fine case of cherry-picking stats. Why does "under pressure" matter more than "not under pressure"? You have to look at Tyrod's overall body of work to fairly evaluate him. But given that our OL isn't great in passpro, I am glad that Tyrod statistically thrives under pressure. But look at Brady's numbers under pressure. Unreal. And I don't necessarily disagree with CF. Dennison might yet prove good for Tyrod - and the offense in general - though there have been some issues with the offense during Rico's first 8 games with the franchise. Excited to see how the second half of the season unfolds. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorkington Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Unfortunately he's not good enough to drag along a struggling run game and a mediocre defense. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 6 minutes ago, Dorkington said: Unfortunately he's not good enough to drag along a struggling run game and a mediocre defense. How many NFL QBs do you believe can? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorkington Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Just now, 26CornerBlitz said: How many NFL QBs do you believe can? Very very few. We either need a HoF level QB (hard to obtain), or some more talent and depth at some key positions (easier, especially with how many picks we have). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 visual --- Ah the EYE test is back does it say how many plays he's not under pressure? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLTbills Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 But but but but but but but....... PETERMAN!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPP Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 This thread "concerns" me........sorry....saw Peterman above and had to say this..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Arnold Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Stop getting sacked. Seven sacks in one game is absolutely inexcusable. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPP Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 27 minutes ago, Wayne Arnold said: Stop getting sacked. Seven sacks in one game is absolutely inexcusable. Fix the line Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Arnold Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, JPP said: Fix the line Pressure is on the line. Sacks are more often than not on the quarterback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7975 Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 32 minutes ago, Wayne Arnold said: Stop getting sacked. Seven sacks in one game is absolutely inexcusable. According to people that professionally look at this stuff, only 2 of those 7 sacks on on Taylor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPP Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Wayne Arnold said: Pressure is on the line. Sacks are more often than not on the quarterback. So we excuse the play of the line last thursday.....like you said pressure is on the line---right......they couldnt stop a nosebleed..... Edited November 8, 2017 by JPP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 So Tyrod has escapbility. Why is everyone so fascinated with this? It has not led to w’s consistently. It seems to me that many want to believe he is the QB of the future because of all of these meaningless statistics. At the end of the day the real question is does the guy win? The answer so far has been: about half of the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watkins90 Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, BuffaloBill said: So Tyrod has escapbility. Why is everyone so fascinated with this? It has not led to w’s consistently. It seems to me that many want to believe he is the QB of the future because of all of these meaningless statistics. At the end of the day the real question is does the guy win? The answer so far has been: about half of the time. Actually, the answer is actually a little more than half the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 1 minute ago, Watkins90 said: Actually, the answer is actually a little more than half the time. OK... I stand corrected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watkins90 Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, BuffaloBill said: OK... I stand corrected. LOL. I mean he does have a winning record. At least for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 43 minutes ago, Wayne Arnold said: Pressure is on the line. Sacks are more often than not on the quarterback. There were literally offensive linemen being thrown at our QB in our last game That is not a exaggeration Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Arnold Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 1 hour ago, JPP said: So we excuse the play of the line last thursday.....like you said pressure is on the line---right......they couldnt stop a nosebleed..... No one is excusing the line play. They took a dump against the Jets. But a good QB knows that he can't take seven sacks. Especially in an offense that is far from productive. Those sacks are killers. Get the ball out. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts