Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
57 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

I guess that's a no, then? So maybe Hillary wasn't that bad...

Ya right. You are so far up Trump's butt

 

He's Canadian, you dumb !@#$ing shitbiscuit.

Posted

Cook Political Reports tells us:

If it wasn’t already clear, last Tuesday’s election results confirmed a political atmosphere that would seriously endanger the House GOP’s majority in 2018. In Virginia, turnout was up 20 percent over 2013 in localities won by Hillary Clinton, compared to 13 percent in localities carried by President Trump. Not only did Democrat Ralph Northam outperform pre-election polls, Democrats shocked by nearly winning control of Virginia’s House of Delegates. …

Republicans held onto just two of their 17 seats in districts Clinton carried, and are headed to a recount in a third. The results suggest Northern Virginia Rep. Barbara Comstock (VA-10) is the single most vulnerable GOP incumbent in the country.

Posted
On 11/10/2017 at 9:31 AM, row_33 said:

 

yes, any Dem candidate except for Hillary would have easily whipped Trump.

 

the 100% correct hatred of her from everyone not in her cult is tangible with all 5 senses.

 

But what about all those Republicans he beat? Face it, Trump mobilized the bigot vote, had no worries at all about how he would govern, because he didn't care so he could promise every GOP voter everything and deliver nothing. Hillary had to run as a principled candidate, Trump could just run his campaign like a Trump University scam and Conservative voters bought it in the primary and general election 

******* 

 

 

and there is this news: 

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/17/us/puerto-ricans-orlando.html

 

Dont it turn your red states blue ooooo.....

Posted
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

But what about all those Republicans he beat? Face it, Trump mobilized the bigot vote, had no worries at all about how he would govern, because he didn't care so he could promise every GOP voter everything and deliver nothing. Hillary had to run as a principled candidate, Trump could just run his campaign like a Trump University scam and Conservative voters bought it in the primary and general election 

******* 

 

 

and there is this news: 

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/17/us/puerto-ricans-orlando.html

 

Dont it turn your red states blue ooooo.....

Some of your best comedy, right there.

Posted
On 11/18/2017 at 12:23 PM, 3rdnlng said:

Some of your best comedy, right there.

Did Hillary promise a wall, coal jobs, infrastructre up the butt, health care for everyone, ending terrorism, super amazing beyond belief trade deals, tax cuts for everyone, re-opening of factories, rebuilding Detroit, and the seocond coming of Christ (Him) ?? 

 

Please, Trump ran a totally unrealistic campaign whereas Hillary was much more reserved and realistic 

Posted
On 11/20/2017 at 10:30 AM, Tiberius said:

Did Hillary promise a wall, coal jobs, infrastructre up the butt, health care for everyone, ending terrorism, super amazing beyond belief trade deals, tax cuts for everyone, re-opening of factories, rebuilding Detroit, and the seocond coming of Christ (Him) ?? 

 

Please, Trump ran a totally unrealistic campaign whereas Hillary was much more reserved and realistic 

Yeah, it was a strokes of pure genius to, "realistically", tell:

 

1. Coal miners she was going to put them out of business, when coal mining is a job/directly relates to a job in MI, WI, PA...with Trump winning the rest of the states that depend on coal by blowouts. Great job almost losing VA because of the coal comments, too, Hillary. :lol:

 

2. Calling half of Americans "Deplorable". You can quibble with the details/try, and fail, to wordsmith what she actually said. It don't matter. It's what people heard that matters.

 

Two great examples of being "reserved and realistic". :lol:

 

You, again, are an unmitigated moron. Hillary won more votes in CA, which entirely make up her "popular vote" count. Enough with this delusion. We'd be in serious trouble if the people in CA had any more say on what happens in this country than they already do. The good news: by 2020 they will lose more electoral votes, so will NY, and the rest of the blue states. Thus a Democrat who wins the popular vote, but loses the electoral college, is going away soon. 100 years from now...2000-2020 will be nothing more than a quirky footnote in American electoral politics, that less than %1 of the country will know/care about. They will teach 9/11. They won't teach "Hillary should have won", not ever.

Posted
2 hours ago, row_33 said:

America gives two terms to one party and then switches to the other without thinking much about it. 

 

I hate to say it, but if the Dems are really going with either Hitlery again or Sen Pocahontas, I guess I'm down for a Trump reelection!  

Posted
5 hours ago, KD in CA said:

 

I hate to say it, but if the Dems are really going with either Hitlery again or Sen Pocahontas, I guess I'm down for a Trump reelection!  

Lol, now it's Warren also who is unacceptable and Trump the totally corrupt retard traitor is ok. Next it will be anyone else Dems consider. Face it, you guys just love Trump 

Posted
41 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Lol, now it's Warren also who is unacceptable and Trump the totally corrupt retard traitor is ok. Next it will be anyone else Dems consider. Face it, you guys just love Trump 

She's a commie.

Posted
51 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

You think that about all Dems, correct? 

 

 

 

 

Some.  Not all.  Some are just criminals like a lot of Republicans.  But Warren is a commie.

Posted
27 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

Some.  Not all.  Some are just criminals like a lot of Republicans.  But Warren is a commie.

Who ever the Dems nominate you guys will be screaming they are worse than child molesters and traitors. Heck, if they nominated John Kasich, you guys would say he is the worst person ever. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, OJABBA said:

Liz is a librarian. A commie librarian.

And way better than Garbage (Trump) 

 

Trump is endorsing a pedophile 

******

Quote


CHESTERFIELD, Va. — In this bastion of Virginia-brand conservatism, dozens of Democratic women roared on a recent night as their organization’s leader crowed over their party’s historic electoral triumph.

For the first time since 1961, Chesterfield County backed a Democrat for governor — and the driving forces in this Richmond suburb included women who defiantly trumpeted a political label their party has ducked for decades.

“Are we done?” Kim Drew Wright asked members of the organization that she and her allies christened the Liberal Women of Chesterfield County after President Trump’s election last year.

Noooooo!” the women shouted back.

Until Gov.-elect Ralph Northam (D) won Chesterfield County three weeks ago, the stretch of suburban and rural communities southwest of Richmond had been considered reliably Republican.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/why-a-historically-conservative-county-in-virginia-is-making-national-republicans-nervous/2017/11/25/654a90f4-cbbb-11e7-8321-481fd63f174d_story.html?utm_term=.c77123f643fa

Posted

 

 

WTOP · 1 day ago
 
I figured that it was best to wait til the certifying of results happened, of course there are still recounts (and we know from experience how the dems can finagle those)
 
s-l300.jpg.....THE TAP BELL IN THE NIGHT.
 
So the results of this democrat wave............this overwhelming repudiation of Trump is...................????
 
They retain the governorship in blue New Jersey
 
They retain the governorship in blue Virginia
 
but wait............they DID win many, many additional house seats............ thats true, but
 
Republicans - 51, democrats -  49
 
So, this great comeback is really more of a media invention for the gullible..............imagine that.
 
.
 
 
×
×
  • Create New...