Tiberius Posted September 13, 2018 Author Posted September 13, 2018 7 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Remind me again, who won in 2016? Oh, and only Rasmussen polls likely voters. The rest do not. That won't help Trump in 2020. And Rasmussen is the least reliable pollster. No surprise you bring up that one. Trump brings that one up a lot.
/dev/null Posted September 13, 2018 Posted September 13, 2018 3 hours ago, Tiberius said: What's wrong with this? When you have one candidate getting millions of more votes than the other candidate, you would probably figure the odds were in that person's favor. 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted September 14, 2018 Posted September 14, 2018 It is always interesting watching primary results come out. The only signs I saw locally were for two for Kathy Hochul, and I swear it was her putting them on her front lawn (more likely someone that looks a lot like her since it was just the other day). Except for Cuomo and all the uncontested Rs running, I couldn't say how any of this is gonna turn out. I am shocked how many have voted for Cynthia Nixon. Cuomo really is hated if that many people will vote for that nut. I hope the RNC gives Molinaro some cash so he can put up a decent fight. I wonder if Nixon's Working Families line will peel off any votes from Cuomo in the general election?
Tiberius Posted September 14, 2018 Author Posted September 14, 2018 4 hours ago, /dev/null said: How does that mean the polls were off base? Monday morning quarterbacking is easy
/dev/null Posted September 14, 2018 Posted September 14, 2018 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: How does that mean the polls were off base? Monday morning quarterbacking is easy If the polls were so accurate why didn't Hiliary take a detour from her victory lap for a visit to Wisconsin or Michigan?
DC Tom Posted September 14, 2018 Posted September 14, 2018 22 minutes ago, Tiberius said: How does that mean the polls were off base? Monday morning quarterbacking is easy How the !@#$ have you lived this long without accidentally stabbing yourself to death with a spoon or something? 1
Doc Brown Posted September 14, 2018 Posted September 14, 2018 3 hours ago, DC Tom said: How the !@#$ have you lived this long without accidentally stabbing yourself to death with a spoon or something? I think he meant the national polls were pretty darn close to the actual outcome (the aggregate of all the polls had Hillary at around plus 3 and she finished at plus 2 nationally). The state polls were the problem in the Midwest states (PA, MI, WI) and North Carolina where Hillary had a slight lead and she under performed by about 5 points swinging those states to Trump. She over performed in Colorado and Nevada. 14 hours ago, B-Man said: 2016 Election Forecast Updated : Nov. 8, 2016 Who will win the presidency? Chance of winning Hillary Clinton........................................Donald Trump 71.4%....................................28.6% https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/ Sadly, this was the projection model giving Trump the best chance to win based on the available polls.
Doc Brown Posted September 14, 2018 Posted September 14, 2018 4 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: It is always interesting watching primary results come out. The only signs I saw locally were for two for Kathy Hochul, and I swear it was her putting them on her front lawn (more likely someone that looks a lot like her since it was just the other day). Except for Cuomo and all the uncontested Rs running, I couldn't say how any of this is gonna turn out. I am shocked how many have voted for Cynthia Nixon. Cuomo really is hated if that many people will vote for that nut. I hope the RNC gives Molinaro some cash so he can put up a decent fight. I wonder if Nixon's Working Families line will peel off any votes from Cuomo in the general election? Turnout for the Dem primaries was huge in NYS compared to 2014 with Obama in power. Almost triple. Nixon got about 200,000 more votes than Cuomo did in 2014. Republican turnout would have to be massive to upset Cuomo in November.
snafu Posted September 14, 2018 Posted September 14, 2018 5 hours ago, Doc Brown said: Turnout for the Dem primaries was huge in NYS compared to 2014 with Obama in power. Almost triple. Nixon got about 200,000 more votes than Cuomo did in 2014. Republican turnout would have to be massive to upset Cuomo in November. Unless (and I doubt it will happen) Nixon stays on the ballot. Hard left Progressives in NYC hate Cuomo that much. They must be thinking about it.
Tiberius Posted September 14, 2018 Author Posted September 14, 2018 9 hours ago, /dev/null said: If the polls were so accurate why didn't Hiliary take a detour from her victory lap for a visit to Wisconsin or Michigan? Why can't you make a coherent argument? Do you understand what you are trying to say? 6 hours ago, Doc Brown said: I think he meant the national polls were pretty darn close to the actual outcome (the aggregate of all the polls had Hillary at around plus 3 and she finished at plus 2 nationally). The state polls were the problem in the Midwest states (PA, MI, WI) and North Carolina where Hillary had a slight lead and she under performed by about 5 points swinging those states to Trump. She over performed in Colorado and Nevada. Sadly, this was the projection model giving Trump the best chance to win based on the available polls. Yes, but I their underlying unstated premise is that polls can't be trusted because they generally show Trump as unpopular. Anything that reports the truth is suspect in Trump supporters eyes.
3rdnlng Posted September 14, 2018 Posted September 14, 2018 11 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Why can't you make a coherent argument? Do you understand what you are trying to say? Yes, but I their underlying unstated premise is that polls can't be trusted because they generally show Trump as unpopular. Anything that reports the truth is suspect in Trump supporters eyes. Why can't you make a coherent argument? Do you understand what you are trying to say?
Tiberius Posted September 14, 2018 Author Posted September 14, 2018 4 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Why can't you make a coherent argument? Do you understand what you are trying to say? Do you? What is your point, stupid?
/dev/null Posted September 14, 2018 Posted September 14, 2018 Just now, Tiberius said: Do you? What is your point, stupid? 1
Tiberius Posted September 14, 2018 Author Posted September 14, 2018 Just now, /dev/null said: Why didn't Hillary watch that? Then the polls would have something.
3rdnlng Posted September 14, 2018 Posted September 14, 2018 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Do you? What is your point, stupid? You are too dumb to figure it out even when I make it painfully clear. I would tell you to think, but I'm pretty sure that's not in your repertoire.
/dev/null Posted September 14, 2018 Posted September 14, 2018 12 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Why didn't Hillary watch that? Then the polls would have something.
Tiberius Posted September 14, 2018 Author Posted September 14, 2018 2 minutes ago, /dev/null said: See, if Hillary was there the polls would something.
/dev/null Posted September 14, 2018 Posted September 14, 2018 7 minutes ago, Tiberius said: See, if Hillary was there the polls would something. Another example of Hiliary ignoring working class whites
Tiberius Posted September 14, 2018 Author Posted September 14, 2018 1 minute ago, /dev/null said: Another example of Hiliary ignoring working class whites Unlike Trump, who loves them! He loves them the same way he did with his Trump University scam. Phil Housley's wife is behind in her Senate race. That would be strange if she won and then started running for President or something. Sabres post game press conferences would never be the same. https://kstp.com/politics/kstp-surveyusa-tina-smith-holds-single-digit-lead-in-us-senate-race-11-percent-undecided/5067874/
Recommended Posts