Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Stand down? Is that a lie? 

 

Shoring up up the voting systems to make sure they don't get hacked would be a good start

 

 

Great, how do you propose he shores up all 50 voting systems? The individual States control their voting systems. You do remember that we live in a federal republic with dual sovereigns, right?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

 

Great, how do you propose he shores up all 50 voting systems? The individual States control their voting systems. You do remember that we live in a federal republic with dual sovereigns, right?

A daily caller article, lol!! 

 

Anything else? 

 

Oh, its impossible to protect voting in the states? I guess you have not heard about the 15th, 19th and 26th amendments to the FEDERAL CONSTITUTION? 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

A daily caller article, lol!! 

 

Anything else? 

 

Oh, its impossible to protect voting in the states? I guess you have not heard about the 15th, 19th and 26th amendments to the FEDERAL CONSTITUTION? 

 

Ok, so your proposal is to amend the constitution?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Ok, so your proposal is to amend the constitution?

Only if the Federal Reserve is there to enforce the elections.

Posted
2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Only if the Federal Reserve is there to enforce the elections.

 

They should station FBI Police around the perimeter as well.

Posted
28 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

 

Great, how do you propose he shores up all 50 voting systems? The individual States control their voting systems. You do remember that we live in a federal republic with dual sovereigns, right?

 

paper ballots

 

next question

Posted
4 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

paper ballots

 

next question

 

How do you force the states to use them?

Posted
11 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

How do you force the states to use them?

 

how do you force anything?

 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Ok, so your proposal is to amend the constitution?

Oh, you don't know how to read! 

16 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

How do you force the states to use them?

Why would anyone have to force them? 

 

Basically you you just want nothing done so it's easier for the Russians. 

 

Serious question. Do you believe that Democratic government is the best? Small d  

Posted
3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Oh, you don't know how to read! 

 

You quote amendments to the constitution as your justification that the federal government can change state voting laws, then claim that I can't read when I ask you if your plan for Trump to do something is for him to amend the constitution?

 

Never stop gatoring, buddy. Never stop.

Posted
Just now, Koko78 said:

 

You quote amendments to the constitution as your justification that the federal government can change state voting laws, then claim that I can't read when I ask you if your plan for Trump to do something is for him to amend the constitution?

 

Never stop gatoring, buddy. Never stop.

Change voting laws? I never said to do anything of the kind. You just argue what you want I guess and make it up as you go 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Change voting laws? I never said to do anything of the kind. You just argue what you want I guess and make it up as you go 

 

Ok, then: What's your proposal for Trump to do something to prevent Russian "hacking"?

Posted
Just now, Koko78 said:

 

Ok, then: What's your proposal for Trump to do something to prevent Russian "hacking"?

 

"Hold my beer and watch this..."

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Why would anyone have to force them? 

 

Basically you you just want nothing done so it's easier for the Russians. 

 

Serious question. Do you believe that Democratic government is the best? Small d  

 

Ah hell, missed the addition.

 

A democratic government is a terrible idea for any population bigger than the size of ancient Athens. Thankfully, we live in a federal republic whose election systems are largely based upon single member district plurality.

Edited by Koko78
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Ok, then: What's your proposal for Trump to do something to prevent Russian "hacking"?

Work harder on the cyber security, make it a priority. 

 

What would you do. I mean if you were not opposed to protecting our voting systems? Just pretend you actually cared. 

 

Edited by Tiberius
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Work harder on the cyber security, make it a priority. 

 

What would you do. I mean if you were not opposed to protecting our voting systems? Just pretend you actually cared. 

 

And did you answer my question about democracy? No? Wonder why that is ...

 

Ok, how do you integrate those federal cyber security proposals into 50 different voting systems without changing state laws or amending the Constitution?

 

As for the answer to your question, look up one post, dumbass.

Edited by Koko78
Posted
14 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Ok, how do you integrate those federal cyber security proposals into 50 different voting systems without changing state laws or amending the Constitution?

 

As for the answer to your question, look up one post, dumbass.

On a state by state basis I guess. Can you walk and chew gum at the same time? Pretty stupid question! 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

On a state by state basis I guess. Can you walk and chew gum at the same time? Pretty stupid question! 

 

I actually can. My failing is not being able to write and talk at the same time.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Ah hell, missed the addition.

 

A democratic government is a terrible idea for any population bigger than the size of ancient Athens. Thankfully, we live in a federal republic whose election systems are largely based upon single member district plurality.

So no, you don't. I suspect most Conservatives are anti-democracy too and the feeling is growing. "Hello Russia if you are listening, help us beat the Democrats" 

×
×
  • Create New...