Jump to content

The Fire Bell In The Night


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LABillzFan said:

 

If you couldn't watch that, you're gonna puke on this one....

 

 

 

I made it 26 seconds before I said !@#$ that

 

This commercial only serves to re-enforce one of the biggest problems that I have with Democrats.  Their total lack of fiscal responsibility.   

 

O'Rourke has supposedly raked in tons of campaign cash recently.  But they chose to spend it making that monstrosity of an ad.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Joe Miner said:

It's ok. The new message is finally out for the Dems.  We're back to killing Grandma and kids with cancer and we'll pound on preexisting conditions going into the midterms.

 

Preexisting conditions will be all you hear for the next 2 weeks.

Well, elected Republicans are on board with the lawsuit to kill it, so ya. You might not like that people are voting against that policy but they really are trying to kill it. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Joe Miner said:

It's ok. The new message is finally out for the Dems.  We're back to killing Grandma and kids with cancer and we'll pound on preexisting conditions going into the midterms.

 

Preexisting conditions will be all you hear for the next 2 weeks.

 

It's amazing that they keep going with the spaghetti strategy, rather than coming up with an actual platform.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SIX REASONS REPUBLICANS SHOULD STILL WORRY ABOUT MIDTERMS:

 

Things are definitely looking up with two weeks left before the 2018 midterms, but LifeZette’s Brendan Kirby points to some continuing realities.

 

 

Then go read Byron York’s excellent analysis for the Washington Examiner of the reconciliation of Donald Trump and Ted Cruz.

 

 

And finally check out Jim Antle’s lengthy look, also at WEX, at whether the president can seal the deal and save the GOP majorities come election day.

 

 

 

 

.

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

It's amazing that they keep going with the spaghetti strategy, rather than coming up with an actual platform.

Democrats have a pretty clear platform. Provide a check on executive branch, protect health care that GOP is trying as hard as they can to take away, protect Dreamers, investigate corruption which seems widespread and save the environment. How did you miss those things? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

 

1.) They're not running on any of these.

 

2.) Their actual platform is to raise taxes, eliminate border security, impeach Trump for beating Hillary, impeach Kavanaugh for being confirmed, and start as many frivolous and disingenuous investigations as they can, while lying about the results of their frivolity.

 

3.) They're so ***** stupid that they have yet to figure out that "Orange man bad" is not a winning strategy. They deserve to lose. All they had to do was not be crazy, and they couldn't pull it off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

1.) They're not running on any of these.

 

2.) Their actual platform is to raise taxes, eliminate border security, impeach Trump for beating Hillary, impeach Kavanaugh for being confirmed, and start as many frivolous and disingenuous investigations as they can, while lying about the results of their frivolity.

 

3.) They're so ***** stupid that they have yet to figure out that "Orange man bad" is not a winning strategy. They deserve to lose. All they had to do was not be crazy, and they couldn't pull it off.

LOL! You really need to expand your sources of news. 

 

I get you want Dems to be like that, but reality is different. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

LOL! You really need to expand your sources of news. 

 

I get you want Dems to be like that, but reality is different. 

 

Yeah, it's a clear winning strategy when they are virtually assured to lose seats in the Senate, and are increasingly unlikely to take the House.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Yeah, it's a clear winning strategy when they are virtually assured to lose seats in the Senate, and are increasingly unlikely to take the House.

The Senate is mostly red states and states Trump won, though Dems are holding many of those seats anyway and look safe. 2020 is a much better looking years for Senate. House looks likely to go Dem even though the Gerrymandering means they have to win by 7% or more. Which will be close. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...