Tiberius Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 On 11/8/2017 at 7:19 PM, GG said: How do you define fighting. They probably accounted for 80% of the casualties, because all they knew was to throw people into the fire (not limited to war time either) Lol, this is so ignorant!
Deranged Rhino Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 40 minutes ago, DC Tom said: This is too ridiculously ignorant to refute. Get a basic knowledge of the subject (Bellamy is a good start), then come talk to me. Absolute War? I just started reading that yesterday. So random.
Tiberius Posted November 10, 2017 Posted November 10, 2017 16 hours ago, Dante said: Wrong. Super whacked out strategy defeated the Nazi's. Commies couldn't create a good joke on their own. They have to steal everything. Soviets benefited from multiple fronts and diluted German resources. Russians made a lot of great weapon systems. The T-34 tank might have been the best medium tank of the war. Their airplanes were pretty good also. In one of the most amazing episodes of the war the Soviets packed up most of their endangered industry and moved it back behind the Ural mountain. They were a super power for a reason The debate over Nazis vs Commies is hard to measure because the Nazis only lasted a short time but did so much damage, including industrialized murder. The communists just were around longer. Most importantly it assumes these system existed in a vacuum. Capitalism had the transatlantic slave trade, a nasty holocaust, yet evolved into a great system. Look at China today. Is it Communist or capitalist? Who knows were Nazism would have gone if it had won the war
Recommended Posts