Woodman19 Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 (edited) Do you watch the Bills? McDermott is ultra conservative. Running the ball and playing turnover free football while clinging to leads. Your dreaming if you think Peterman is playing this year at the teams current pace. And expect Tyrod back next year. I think any coach prefers a prolific passing game over ground and pound. If you have a great RB and a good running QB who isn't the best passer do you think a good coach is going to try to run an air assault? Also, he never mentioned Peterman. Edited November 2, 2017 by Woodman19
BringBackOrton Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 Do you watch the Bills? McDermott is ultra conservative. Running the ball and playing turnover free football while clinging to leads. Your dreaming if you think Peterman is playing this year at the teams current pace. And expect Tyrod back next year. Serious question. How much influence do you think McD has on Dennison's play calls?
Scott7975 Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 Serious question. How much influence do you think McD has on Dennison's play calls? You didn't ask me but I'll throw my 2 cents. Playcall themselves likely none. Conservative/aggressiveness is probably McD. Just like punt/fg go for it is McD call.
Wayne Arnold Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 Do you watch the Bills? McDermott is ultra conservative. Running the ball and playing turnover free football while clinging to leads. Your dreaming if you think Peterman is playing this year at the teams current pace. And expect Tyrod back next year. No he's not. He'll attempt a 4th down conversion once in a while. He's no Doug Marrone, that's for sure. McDermott isn't brain-dead enough to think "clinging to leads" sixteen times in an NFL season is a recipe for success.
BringBackOrton Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 You didn't ask me but I'll throw my 2 cents. Playcall themselves likely none. Conservative/aggressiveness is probably McD. Just like punt/fg go for it is McD call. If its not playcalls, how can we say he affects # of attempts?
Scott7975 Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 (edited) If its not playcalls, how can we say he affects # of attempts? Because of the conservative/aggressive. He can and likely does tell Dennison something along the lines of... Ok it's mid 3rd quarter and we have a lead. Start burning clock. Or ok we need to score start getting aggressive. Edited November 2, 2017 by Scott7975
transplantbillsfan Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 I think my point was obvious. For the record, I understand your argument, I just think it's over simplistic, revisionist and just not satisfactory. How is it revisionist or a simplistic if every single year the average of every single defensive minded head coach always passes the ball last van the offensive minded head coach? If the average is consistently higher for the head coach with the background in offense, that's not revisionist or simplistic, that's a trend. Also, I made a mistake in my calculations. I meant to exclude John Harbaugh from the numbers because he has a special teams background, and for some reason I excluded him in the numbers themselves as I added them up, but I included him when I divided the total number. Actual number: 2017 Defensive HCs: 31 pass attempts per game 2017 Offensive HCs: 34.8 pass attempts per game
ALF Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 I still believe the team would be best served picking up a top QB, and I am ok with TT getting an extension. Worse case scenario future trade bait and awesome depth Agree , hope that pick is better then Mahomes and Watson . T. White is excellent , but a franchise QB is the goal.
ddaryl Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 Will the Ghost of Denver return? that one is lost on me....
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 that one is lost on me.... for 2 seasons there have been rumors/stories of Denver being interested in signing Taylor. yeah, I worded that poorly before
BringBackOrton Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 How is it revisionist or a simplistic if every single year the average of every single defensive minded head coach always passes the ball last van the offensive minded head coach? If the average is consistently higher for the head coach with the background in offense, that's not revisionist or simplistic, that's a trend. Also, I made a mistake in my calculations. I meant to exclude John Harbaugh from the numbers because he has a special teams background, and for some reason I excluded him in the numbers themselves as I added them up, but I included him when I divided the total number. Actual number: 2017 Defensive HCs: 31 pass attempts per game 2017 Offensive HCs: 34.8 pass attempts per game Because correlation does not and has not ever meant causation.
transplantbillsfan Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 Serious question. How much influence do you think McD has on Dennison's play calls? He's the head coach, dude! Are you friggin serious?!?! McDermott isn't calling individual plays but you can bet he's the one dictating the offensive philosophy, ala attacking offense vs. ball control offense. Do you actually think a head coach just says to his OC, "yeah man, do whatever you want, I don't care."????
Bangarang Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 (edited) He's the head coach, dude! Are you friggin serious?!?! McDermott isn't calling individual plays but you can bet he's the one dictating the offensive philosophy, ala attacking offense vs. ball control offense. Do you actually think a head coach just says to his OC, "yeah man, do whatever you want, I don't care."???? 5 teams in the top 10 in pass attempts this year have HCs with defensive backgrounds. For the record, I dont think its as simple as youre saying. Just saying. Be gentile. Edited November 2, 2017 by Bangarang
BringBackOrton Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 He's the head coach, dude! Are you friggin serious?!?! McDermott isn't calling individual plays but you can bet he's the one dictating the offensive philosophy, ala attacking offense vs. ball control offense. Do you actually think a head coach just says to his OC, "yeah man, do whatever you want, I don't care."???? You can play ball control and still pass the ball. Which is why I asked about play calls.
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 (edited) 5 teams in the top 10 in pass attempts this year have HCs with defensive backgrounds. For the record, I dont think its as simple as youre saying. Just saying. Be gentile. lol You can play ball control and still pass the ball. Which is why I asked about play calls. agree. Isn't "ball control offense" where you forego the big play to focus on low risk plays which lets you maximize time of possession and minimize your defensive plays. Nothing says it is run only. Another way to look at it from another angle Ball control compensates for lack of offensive firepower. aka a passing game. Edited November 2, 2017 by ShadyBillsFan
SoTier Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 Why do you assume a conservative, run-first offense is what McDermott wants? It doesn't occur to you that he knows a run-first offense is his only choice right now considering the limitations of the quarterback? Right-o. It has NOTHING to do with the fact that the Bills have one of the premier RBs in the NFL, an OL that's good at run blocking, and significantly better at run blocking than at pass blocking, as well as TEs that know how to block for the run. It has NOTHING to do with the fact that the Bills play their home games in an open stadium in an area that's infamous for windy weather, especially from about late October onward. It's all about Taylor's "limitations" because we all know that "franchise QBs" have no "limitations". What exactly are Taylor's limitations that make it impossible for the McDermott to institute a pass first offense, BTW? In the past, he was criticized for not utilizing the middle of the field. He's been doing that. He's certainly has been changing his style from "running QB" to "mobile pocket QB" like Rodgers or Smith. He can make all the throws, he's fairly accurate, and he doesn't make stupid decisions, so he takes care of the football. He's been criticized for not throwing into tight windows enough and for not "throwing receivers open" and he still needs to work on both. Those are hardly the worst "limitations" a QB can have though. Just ask Vance Joseph or Hue Jackson. Maybe it's his lack of height ... he can't do much about that but then neither could Drew Brees or Russell Wilson. 5 teams in the top 10 in pass attempts this year have HCs with defensive backgrounds. For the record, I dont think its as simple as youre saying. Just saying. Be gentile. I don't think it is, either. I think a big determinant is whether the team can muster a good running game or not. Ideally, teams like to be able to do both but with the constraints of the salary cap, they realistically can't unless they can get a lot of production out of players on rookie contracts ... or they stint on the resources they allocate to the defense. When they can't get a good running game going, the good teams often utilize short passes instead of runs to get 3-6 yards a pop. NE has had this problem for years, primarily I think, because they've built and maintained their OL as a premier pass blocking unit to protect Brady. The lack of a running game has been a major problem for the Giants the last couple of years as they've invested in their passing game (QB/receivers) and their defense but couldn't afford to invest in their OL.
Turk71 Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 All this talk about passing more and no one mentions that last year teams were slightly more likely to win if they passed for less than 300yds. Teams that passed for 300 plus had a losing record. That isn't an opinion. Like I said, its a team game with many elements and ways to get it done. The only guaranteed way to win is scoring more points. Do not understand the obsession with throwing the ball more. It is not an automatically better way to do it, all depends on the situation. Annoying how some people seem more obsessed with certain players(pro or con) than the team. That said I have been critical of TT in the past, but it is easy for me to see he has gotten better.
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 All this talk about passing more and no one mentions that last year teams were slightly more likely to win if they passed for less than 300yds. Teams that passed for 300 plus had a losing record. That isn't an opinion. Like I said, its a team game with many elements and ways to get it done. The only guaranteed way to win is scoring more points. Do not understand the obsession with throwing the ball more. It is not an automatically better way to do it, all depends on the situation. Annoying how some people seem more obsessed with certain players(pro or con) than the team. That said I have been critical of TT in the past, but it is easy for me to see he has gotten better. All passing yards are down as well as scoring. Think of it this way RE: 300 ypg The QB's in the NFL are either a) Bad b) Average c) Getting too old.
artmalibu Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 What is the thing all the sudden with the "trap game". Wasnt the wording of possible upset good enough.
Turk71 Posted November 2, 2017 Posted November 2, 2017 (edited) What is the thing all the sudden with the "trap game". Wasnt the wording of possible upset good enough. The 'trap game' is a game that you perceive your opponent to be inferior and assume you will easily win. That should never happen on a well coached team and I doubt the Bills are approaching this game like that. I expect a tough, hard fought road game against a divisional rival. No gimmes in the NFL especially on the road. Edited November 2, 2017 by Turk71
Recommended Posts