Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

He was on the Bills for what, a week?

 

I think it's wrong that they need to approve any kind of trade.

 

Just let the man pursue his dreams and further his career.

 

I feel that the Bills are treating Boldin as "their property," and it's unjust.

 

If he'd had a longer tenure with Buffalo, YES, I would get it.

 

But he never played a meaningful down. They should just unchain him and let him go to whichever team he chooses.

 

Like everyone is saying, he's old and washed up, so why does it matter? Why do they need to get something in return?

  • Replies 208
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

 

Why do they need to get something in return?

Contractual rights. It's a business and both parties knew that when they signed said contract.

 

And I never did hear how the signing bonus was handled when AB 'retired'...

Posted

The Bills have already paid him his signing bonus, for 2 weeks of work. Bolton is not in any way being mistreated here. He knew the score. The Bills have rights and are exercising them. Very simple.

Posted

Contractual rights. It's a business and both parties knew that when they signed said contract.

 

And I never did hear how the signing bonus was handled when AB 'retired'...

That’s enough to wrap this up.

 

 

Were you being serious???

Posted (edited)

Its principle. Boldin made a commitment and threw it all away. Makes him look childish for not honoring a commitment and try coming back If he didnt want to be "oppressed" then he shouldnt have signed the contract.

Edited by Kmart128
Posted

Really? Just wow. Guy wants to play, picks a team out of maybe a small handful, signs an exclusive rights contract and then retires and the other party should just allow that? I'm a moderate but that's some bleeding heart liberal shite right there. If he didn't want to play here, shouldn't have signed. And because he did and then quit, that's on him too. Could have asked for a trade rather than walking out. Could have played and then asked for a trade. There's also a precedent here. No other owner would want to the Bills to grant a player an outright release after they "retired," it would open up opportunities for other players to pay that card.

Posted

He was on the Bills for what, a week?

 

I think it's wrong that they need to approve any kind of trade.

 

Just let the man pursue his dreams and further his career.

 

I feel that the Bills are treating Boldin as "their property," and it's unjust.

 

If he'd had a longer tenure with Buffalo, YES, I would get it.

 

But he never played a meaningful down. They should just unchain him and let him go to whichever team he chooses.

 

Like everyone is saying, he's old and washed up, so why does it matter? Why do they need to get something in return?

He's under contract. A contract he signed of his own free will. He is responsible to meet the terms he agreed to in signing that contract. Don't blame the Bills for Boldin's choices and for trying to work a trade to better the team.

Posted

He signed a contract to play for Buffalo. Then at the last second he retires.. screwing Buffalo in the process who was relying on him. How could you feel for the guy? He's a fickle jerk who can't make up his mind. Good for the Bills for not letting him off the hook.

Posted

He signed a contract to play for Buffalo. Then at the last second he retires.. screwing Buffalo in the process who was relying on him. How could you feel for the guy? He's a fickle jerk who can't make up his mind. Good for the Bills for not letting him off the hook.

 

Gotta be #woke, breh.

Posted (edited)

 

I feel that the Bills are treating Boldin as "their property," and it's unjust.

 

They should just unchain him and let him go to whichever team he chooses.

 

 

Does Gugny = Al Sharpton? I mean really. I am not all PC and all but truly words like "oppressed" "property" and "unchain" sounds like you are looking for Civil War reparations at the worst or trolling at best.

 

BTW... it is a contract signed by a "free man" so, in turn, he needs to honor it.

Edited by aceman_16
Posted

BS. Im all for Beane to play hardball here. Boldin signed to play with the Bills, probably taking other potential free agents off the board we could have signed but didnt because Boldin was committed.

Posted

Let's just say you signed a year long lease for an apartment and moved into the place. After 2 weeks you say "hey, I don't want to live here anymore and I'm gonna move."

 

What do you think the land lord would do? Just let you break the contract and walk away? Have fun with that.

 

I'm sure you could get out of it, but it would cost you. The same principles apply to Bolden. He's gonna have to pay to get out of this mess he created.

×
×
  • Create New...