row_33 Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 Thank goodness that crooked hag lost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 Jesus F Christ! Is that legit? She's denied it. Multiple NBC sources confirmed it, including Lauer - before he retracted his confirmation. The only thing about that quote that surprises me is that it's the sort of thing that's usually said by surrogates, not from the actual candidate. Aside from that it's completely believable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 The only thing about that quote that surprises me is that it's the sort of thing that's usually said by surrogates, not from the actual candidate. Aside from that it's completely believable. It is believable. But, like you said, that's what surrogates get caught saying. Won't believe it until there is more confirmation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 They really DO need to lock her up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 The WaPo Steele dossier revelations confirm all those fears the country may have had about a Hillary Presidency Hillary Clinton and Democrats lose the high ground on Russiahttp://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/10/26/hillary-clinton-and-democrats-lose-high-ground-on-russia.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 The only thing about that quote that surprises me is that it's the sort of thing that's usually said by surrogates, not from the actual candidate. Aside from that it's completely believable. It is believable. But, like you said, that's what surrogates get caught saying. Won't believe it until there is more confirmation. I agree - and I should have made that more clear in my response to Rob. It wouldn't surprise me either way, if it's legit or not. But I felt it was an appropriate "quote" to bring up in light of what's happening. HRC's book tour and media push lately never really made much sense, other than her being a narcissist and needing the spotlight. But if this story has the legs that it seems to, it could be that she was out there to do damage control for the "storm" she knew was coming. Had she been in hiding or isolation the past few months and then this broke she'd look guilty as hell. Just a thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 I agree - and I should have made that more clear in my response to Rob. It wouldn't surprise me either way, if it's legit or not. But I felt it was an appropriate "quote" to bring up in light of what's happening. HRC's book tour and media push lately never really made much sense, other than her being a narcissist and needing the spotlight. But if this story has the legs that it seems to, it could be that she was out there to do damage control for the "storm" she knew was coming. Had she been in hiding or isolation the past few months and then this broke she'd look guilty as hell. Just a thought. Those are good reasons (from her perspective) plus have to believe she got at least $7 figures if not 8 in the advance. Add to that the way she comes across as intensely bitter & not able to let a slight pass, and it's little wonder that she's been trying to take President Trump's spotlight and the book tour just seemed par for the course. Of course, a fear that someone who comes across as vindictive as her opponent (and she, btw) might not settle for simply having bested her at the ballot box but might also come after her slush fund (CF) or her directly could also be a part of it, like you suggest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 Burn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 Her department was just one of eleven agencies that signed off on the deal. Agencies in the commie Obama administration? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 Basic campaign stuff, but the media always lets the Dems wash their hands and pounce on the sleazy stuff the GOP does. I trust that with the internet this kind of hypocrisy is coming to a wonderful halt, and it is day by day as individuals can come forward about their mistreatment by Dem politicos and their moneybags. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 Basic campaign stuff, but the media always lets the Dems wash their hands and pounce on the sleazy stuff the GOP does. I trust that with the internet this kind of hypocrisy is coming to a wonderful halt, and it is day by day as individuals can come forward about their mistreatment by Dem politicos and their moneybags. Well, seeing how Trump was deeply involved with the criminal regime in Moscow, it seems like the media should be looking into that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 How Team Hillary played the press for fools on Russia by Paul Sperry Original Article Hillary Clinton’s campaign didn’t just pay for the Kremlin-aided smear job on Donald Trump before the election; she continued to use the dirt after the election to frame her humiliating loss as a Russian conspiracy to steal the election. Bitter to the core, she and her campaign aides hatched a scheme, just 24 hours after conceding the race, to spoon-feed the dirty rumors to an eager liberal media and manufacture the narrative Russia secretly colluded with her neophyte foe to sabotage her coronation. Russia ‘Collusion’ Story Is Blowing Up Like the Hindenburg by Conrad Black Original Article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 How Team Hillary played the press for fools on Russia by Paul Sperry Original Article Hillary Clinton’s campaign didn’t just pay for the Kremlin-aided smear job on Donald Trump before the election; she continued to use the dirt after the election to frame her humiliating loss as a Russian conspiracy to steal the election. Bitter to the core, she and her campaign aides hatched a scheme, just 24 hours after conceding the race, to spoon-feed the dirty rumors to an eager liberal media and manufacture the narrative Russia secretly colluded with her neophyte foe to sabotage her coronation. Russia ‘Collusion’ Story Is Blowing Up Like the Hindenburgby Conrad Black Original Article Actually its not. Amazing how many flunkies they have trying to spread lies about this. It's almost as if Trump is such a failure that they right wing propagandists welcome this as a distraction. At least they are not still claiming the Trump Tower meeting was about adoptions, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capco Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 Blindly defend Hillary? Nah. Blindly defend Trump? Nah. Anyone who does either has a few loose screws in their head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 Media and libs blindly defend Hillary Trump isnt defended much by anyone, its alll very entertaining laughing at the media and libs falling apart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 Well, seeing how Trump was deeply involved with the criminal regime in Moscow, it seems like the media should be looking into that. They have... and so far they've found no evidence to suggest Trump was or is "deeply involved with Moscow". Keep on goosestepping to your masters' talking points. One day you'll get the fascist government you're longing for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 Tibs reminds me of a guy that catches another guy balls deep in his wife and then says "They're just friends". Denial is not just a river in Egypt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted October 28, 2017 Author Share Posted October 28, 2017 (edited) Everything you just typed is speculative. You may be right but don't present it as fact. There's no evidence the FBI financed the Steele dossier. There's also no evidence that the Steele dossier prompted the Trump - Russia investigation. If there is, let me know. Page and Manafort were on the FBI's radar long before this dossier was conducted. Since some of what's on the dossier has been proven correct, I'm assuming Mueller interviewed Steele and judged for himself what was credible and what wasn't. You may turn out to be correct, but you're jumping the gun. No it patently is not. In fact, there is very little there that hasn't been corroborated. But, just for fun, let's say you're right. Of the numbered list, which do you want to bet on not turning out to be a fact? Hardly matters. By sometime Friday, Trump will tweet something so insipid that everyone will forget about this anyway. No F'ing way this is going away. It's way too big, and too many people have too much to lose. It's just a matter of time before the media/Dems start turning on each other/making sure they have chair before the music stops. The WSJ just demanded Mueller resign today. It's Friday at 8:06 pm EST. When are you expecting this tweet? I'm just asking because I'm tired, and I'm not gonna stay up all night waiting. Or, you can tell me that you were wrong. I know, I know, that's a tough ask, but couldn't you just do it this one time? Edited October 28, 2017 by OCinBuffalo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 No F'ing way this is going away. It's way too big, and too many people have too much to lose. It's just a matter of time before the media/Dems start turning on each other/making sure they have chair before the music stops. The WSJ just demanded Mueller resign today. It's Friday at 8:06 pm EST. When are you expecting this tweet? I'm just asking because I'm tired, and I'm not gonna stay up all night waiting. Or, you can tell me that you were wrong. I know, I know, that's a tough ask, but couldn't you just do it this one time? It's going to go away. The mainstream media won't take it seriously, so neither will the American public. Happens with plenty of stories, even those inconveniently broken by the Post or NYT. And particularly this one, which isn't telling anyone anything we don't already know: Hillary Clinton is a lying, manipulative, greedy charlatan and hustler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted October 28, 2017 Author Share Posted October 28, 2017 (edited) 4) I was specifically talking to Tibs... but again, where we differ is in the belief that the ultimate power in this country rests in the Oval. I don't believe that for a moment. The ultimate power in this country still resides in the MiC, USIC and the deep state/shadow government - all of whom are currently openly at war with one another. Which gives us, the people, an opportunity if we're smart to take advantage of that infighting to learn the truth and reclaim our country. Well then you've got another thing coming. Subverting the other branches of government was Obama's thing. This is an executive branch thing entirely. Trump can fire/investigate anybody in his branch, and all power will emanate from the Oval. Many heads will roll. Everybody will be investigated, if not canned outright. In fact the entire senior management of National Security/Law Enforcement/DOD should have lawyered up yesterday. Why? They just tried to pull a McCarthy on Trump and failed. Dumb move. Trump is bigger on revenge than Mossad, and he WILL get all of them, again, from the Oval. These people have spent their entire lives as rats; they don't know anything else. Thus, they will snitch on each other. Jeff Sessions won't save them, not after they tried to smear him and get him fired. He will clean house, and open investigations into the DNC, Clinton Campaign, and many individual Ds and Rs. Hell, it's 50/50 on Mueller being fired before the end of next week. The WSJ told him to resign. The WSJ isn't some far-left loon website that demands Trump's resignation every week. The WSJ knows a lot more about this. They said today this is merely the beginning of the bombs, and they're giving Mueller fair warning to get out. Perhaps they see Mueller as a victim of circumstance. They aren't warning the guilty. Like I said: patience, and, Trump == Mossad. He will get them all. The things you worry about will change, because the people in charge will be changed. They're already gone. The thing to watch now is Trump's corrections/process changes after his revenge is complete. The last thing we need is merely promoting today's JV to varsity, and expecting things to be different. But that's a way's off. Trump's revenge will last right through the 2018 elections. it is their job to know the difference. Even if Brennan and Clapper didn't know the evidence was altered(your entire argument depends on them absolutely knowing) , the DNI/ICA was written and published deliberately to undercut Trump's ability to set his own foreign policy agenda. By a hand-picked, small group of people from four(4) agencies, and was not derived from full consensus of 17 agencies, as the Dems and idiot media reported at the time. Yet another "consensus" argument down in flames. Edited October 28, 2017 by OCinBuffalo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts