Call_Of_Ktulu Posted October 18, 2017 Posted October 18, 2017 This is a pointless ranking, I wonder what Kirk Cousins ranking was when he had yet to play a snap and was backup to RG3?
Kirby Jackson Posted October 18, 2017 Posted October 18, 2017 This is a pointless ranking, I wonder what Kirk Cousins ranking was when he had yet to play a snap and was backup to RG3?All rankings are pointless!! There are so many moving parts that dictate success and failure. The scheme, playcalling, other players, down & distance, etc...ultimately determine what happens. The players are a piece of it. Shady is the exact same guy that he was a year ago with a fraction of the success.
LABILLBACKER Posted October 18, 2017 Posted October 18, 2017 Lol. Drafting Peterman was a shrewd decision. There's a good chance he develops into a cheap, competent backup that won't automatically lose the games we need him to play. The only downside I can really think of are the fans who think he was brought in to maybe be the man, and won't shut up about it every time the team loses a game. Let's put it this way. He probably won't be our franchise guy but he'll be a better backup than the likes of Cassel, Tuel, and EJ...
Billsmovinup Posted October 18, 2017 Posted October 18, 2017 (edited) Good news is Peterman isnt seeing the field barring injury. Edited October 18, 2017 by Billsmovinup
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted October 18, 2017 Posted October 18, 2017 How do you rate a rookie with zero starts? You cant. These ratings are a load of ....
Fadingpain Posted October 18, 2017 Posted October 18, 2017 24th rated backup, yet 1st place as a starter! In all seriousness, how can you rate someone who has never played? That was kind of my thought as well. Stupid to say he is the best, worst, 24th best, or anything else.
boyst Posted October 18, 2017 Posted October 18, 2017 This always reminds me of when they do the quarterback duels in the playoffs or such. Or pitchers against pitchers because that's not how it works The arbitrary rankings and the overall quality of a quarterback can be very different. Look at the New Orleans Saints first Indianapolis Colts, it wasn't the quarterback that won the game it was the ability to control the clock which comes down to intellect of the quarterback. Just like in Carolina this year, we should have won that game based in overall quality of our team and their injuries. The same would ring true for Atlanta, who just was not poised to be able to stop us. In fact the NFCS it's not designed to play AFC East football. We control the clock, we play efficient offense, and we have defenses that are quick to react which can stop the potent NFC South offenses. They're huck n Chuck offenses in New Orleans Atlanta and Carolina are not sufficient to be able to beat our team. Tampa Bay is the most well-rounded of them, but that does depend on their running ability. If they can muster a run or control the clock and limit Winston's ability to jeopardize the game, they will beat AFC East teams. But the AFC East is full of mediocre to subpar quarterbacks including that homo in New England who is not playing well this year, it's not why we don't win it is why they lose
Foxx Posted October 18, 2017 Posted October 18, 2017 (edited) http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000863224/article/ranking-every-nfl-teams-backup-qb-from-1-to-32 "Peterman was whispered about as a figure ready to eclipse Tyrod Taylor, but that uprising is on hold for now. It's clear the front office adores him, meaning a switch could come as soon as next offseason." Ryan Mallett QB Ravens Peterman was whispered about as a figure ready to eclipse Tyrod Taylor, but that uprising is on hold for now. It's clear the front office adores him, meaning a switch could come as soon as next offseason ranked #24? i couldn't read the article, does that mean he is ranked higher than Tyrod? settle down jms......... Edited October 18, 2017 by Foxx
DaBillsFanSince1973 Posted October 18, 2017 Posted October 18, 2017 ranked #24? i couldn't read the article, does that mean he is ranked higher than Tyrod? settle down jms......... well, he's not on the list. Ranking every NFL team's backup QB, from 1 to 32
Foxx Posted October 18, 2017 Posted October 18, 2017 well, he's not on the list. Ranking every NFL team's backup QB, from 1 to 32 should he be? i mean..... really now...
DaBillsFanSince1973 Posted October 18, 2017 Posted October 18, 2017 (edited) should he be? i mean..... really now... I laughed out loud. I actually was expecting a very similar response. you're alright in my book Foxx. real talk Edited October 18, 2017 by DaBillsFanSince1973
Foxx Posted October 18, 2017 Posted October 18, 2017 I laughed out loud. I actually was expecting a very similar response. you're alright in my book Foxx. real talk glad i didn't disappoint. what can i say, i threw a line in the water and i got a bite....
CircleTheWagons99 Posted October 18, 2017 Posted October 18, 2017 24th rated backup, yet 1st place as a starter! In all seriousness, how can you rate someone who has never played? This. He has YET to take a snap in a REAL game.
oldmanfan Posted October 18, 2017 Posted October 18, 2017 24th rated backup, yet 1st place as a starter! In all seriousness, how can you rate someone who has never played? Agreed. Some guys write junk just to write junk
Recommended Posts