Jamie Muellers Ghost Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 Murph keep saying stay tuned regarding the Bills tackle situation not that he's been a very good predictor of things like that in the past.
blacklabel Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 Murph keep saying stay tuned regarding the Bills tackle situation not that he's been a very good predictor of things like that in the past. Yeah, I think he's probably just referring to Henderson being back in the mix. If they're continuing on with this Miller/Ducasse competition, I can't see why they wouldn't challenge Mills with Henderson or Dawkins if Glenn is healthy enough to be back full time.
ndirish1978 Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 Yeah, I think he's probably just referring to Henderson being back in the mix. If they're continuing on with this Miller/Ducasse competition, I can't see why they wouldn't challenge Mills with Henderson or Dawkins if Glenn is healthy enough to be back full time. +1. His "news" is likely just that Henderson has been activated to the active roster
offsides#76FredSmerlas Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 If we can get a WR and 3rd/4th round pick for Glenn not sure how we don't pull the trigger ASAP. Glenn is average and his better days are behind him. Time to move on and facilitate this rebuild. We sure didn't pay him like he was average. When healthy I think he is a very good player but he can't stay on the field.
Guest K-GunJimKelly12 Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 Yeah, I think he's probably just referring to Henderson being back in the mix. If they're continuing on with this Miller/Ducasse competition, I can't see why they wouldn't challenge Mills with Henderson or Dawkins if Glenn is healthy enough to be back full time. How about: Glenn, Incognito, Wood, Dawkins, Henderson
NewMexBills Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 Trade him for a WR & i would be happy, get something!
SaviorPeterman Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 We sure didn't pay him like he was average. When healthy I think he is a very good player but he can't stay on the field. He's like Wood, has a handful of very good to great games per season but is average to terrible in the rest. There is a reason why this new regime isn't committing to him just like with Dareus, they obviously want him gone and I'm totally fine with it.
John from Riverside Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 He's like Wood, has a handful of very good to great games per season but is average to terrible in the rest. There is a reason why this new regime isn't committing to him just like with Dareus, they obviously want him gone and I'm totally fine with it. "they obviously want him gone" LMAO
Peter Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 ooooof. As in ouch. Guarantee... Haha https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/guaranty
ddaryl Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 Beane and McD may or may not be the answer, but sticking with one of the worst starting QB's this team has ever seen certainly don't inspire confidence. Obviously you haven't been following the Bills much
SaviorPeterman Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 "they obviously want him gone" LMAO They want their guys and obviously love Dawkins at LT. So unless the plan is to move Glenn to RT not sure there is a long term future for him in Buffalo and certainly not for the ridiculous money he's getting.
Jamie Muellers Ghost Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 Meanwhile Groy is still a backup center. Anyone remember the time line on matching the Rams offer and Castillo coming in BTW? Maybe Castillo has gone Rogue? :-)
3rdand12 Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 (edited) He's like Wood, has a handful of very good to great games per season but is average to terrible in the rest. There is a reason why this new regime isn't committing to him just like with Dareus, they obviously want him gone and I'm totally fine with it. see this is total BS. Glenn has been very good to excellent during his career here. Everyone was delighted at the time when they contracted him. This trade/ move Glenn is just proof you folks are wishy washy daily horoscope reading national enquirer subscribers. This board is becoming an embarrassment with all the GMs making Irsay type suggestions. Go get yourselves cleaned up and come back when your heads are clear. Just because the guy is injured.. sheesh Edited October 17, 2017 by 3rdand12
26CornerBlitz Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 see this is total BS. Glenn has been very good to excellent during his career here. Everyone was delighted at the time when they contracted him. This trade mobe Glenn is just proof you folks are wishy washy daily horoscope reading national enquirer subscribers. This board is becoming an embarrassment with all the GMs making Irsay type suggestions. Go get yourselves cleaned up and come back when your heads are clear. Just because the guy is injured.. sheesh
3rdand12 Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 Trade him for a WR & i would be happy, get something! how about we just keep a Franchise left tackle and see it Bills can get him back to full strength? Or we could go outback to the LT trees.See if any are ripe yet? I have concerns. about the fan base these days. Maybe it's fantasy football Maybe it's global warming. But I sure miss guys and girls who always rooted for the Buffalo laundry
boyst Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/guaranty well, don't I look more foolish than I did just a few minutes ago. I keep thinking the new Levels. Woohoo
AdamK Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 (edited) From the REALLY not important Dept.: Guaranty is not wrong - just obsolete. http://grammarist.com/usage/guarantee-vs-guaranty/ Guaranty is an obsolete form of the word guarantee, it is now mostly used as a noun in financial and legal documents to refer to something that is offered as security that an action will occur. Edited October 17, 2017 by AdamK
John from Riverside Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 Personally I think trading Glenn is lunacy but that is just me
Peter Posted October 17, 2017 Posted October 17, 2017 From the REALLY not important Dept.: Guaranty is not wrong - just obsolete. http://grammarist.com/usage/guarantee-vs-guaranty/ Guaranty is an obsolete form of the word guarantee, it is now mostly used as a noun in financial and legal documents to refer to something that is offered as security that an action will occur. As its says, it is used as a noun - which is the way I used it. I also am an attorney and, as your reference states, it is used in legal documents. Hardly an oooof.
Recommended Posts