Captain Murica Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 Like what? Chanted all in, instead of trust the process.
26CornerBlitz Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 They said it came down to the ability to play ST and they kept Banyard who was active for the 1st time against the Bengals. Chanted all in, instead of trust the process. He really F'ed up then.
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 (edited) McCoy rolls an ankle in the first quarter you are good with just tolbert?Im not good with anything this offense is currently doing. Do I think right now we should be looking for a 2nd or 3rd string rb? No. We have the worst group of the WRs in the league. Thats going to cause us to not be able to run or pass. I would be much more worried about addressing that first. Edited October 11, 2017 by Brianmoorman4jesus
Protocal69 Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 **** how about playing playing the backs that you kept on the active roster T Jones , Bannard
SaviorPeterman Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 We do need another RB because Tolbert is wasting carries and space. Not saying I want to cut him but we need another weapon in the backfield behind McCoy. But I'd still take another WR, Oline, TE, LB, etc first.
oldmanfan Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 We do need another RB because Tolbert is wasting carries and space. Not saying I want to cut him but we need another weapon in the backfield behind McCoy. But I'd still take another WR, Oline, TE, LB, etc first. His yards per carry is a little higher than Shady's.
cba fan Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 Yet, despite having needs at various offensive positions, Mike Garafolo of NFL Network reported on Tuesday that Buffalo is trying to acquire a player at a position of strength. According to Garafolo, the Bills have interest in acquiring a running back. Garafolo joined Deion Sanders in a 21st & Prime segment to discuss Adrian Peterson joining the Arizona Cardinals and he noted that the Bills may have been in the mix to acquire Peterson. When asked if any team close to winning called in regards to Peterson, Garafolo said, "There were a few teams that did nose around. I don't know the specifics of which ones it were, but there were teams checking him out. I did hear that the Buffalo Bills have shown some interest in acquiring a running back so they may have been in that mix, Prime." This website loses all credibility when they say Bills RB roster is "a position of strength" out of touch.
NoSaint Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 Im not good with anything this offense is currently doing. Do I think right now we should be looking for a 2nd or 3rd string rb? No. We have the worst group of the WRs in the league. Thats going to cause us to not be able to run or pass. I would be much more worried about addressing that first. You do realize we can pursue both, right? It doesn't have to be in any order.
fridge Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 Joe Banyard's zero carries is a mystery to me. It would seem he's the McCoy style back-up, yet we've never used him.
billsfan89 Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 (edited) If we're doing this, then I'd rather we just blow up the phones belonging to DeAngelo Williams, who was in CAR with McDermott, or Ronnie Hillman, who played for Dennison in DEN, *EDIT* and also was the odd man out in a DAL backfield that has McFadden as a healthy scratch. There are plenty of decent free agent running backs out there. Hell couldn't they claim Jonathan Williams off of Denver's PS if they wanted to? They should make a play for Barnidge to help out at tight end and then look for help at WR either via trade (maybe if a decent player is available for a mid round or late pick) or via free agency. Running back depth seems like an easier fix. Edited October 11, 2017 by billsfan89
CanadianFan Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 LOL Beane finally heard me. trying to cover his ass for 0 backup RB.
Coach Tuesday Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 (edited) They should buy a time machine and pay $1M more for Mike Gillislee. What this means is that theyll be drafting a RB high next year. Id bet money on it. Edited October 11, 2017 by Coach Tuesday
GoBills808 Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 They should buy a time machine and pay $1M more for Mike Gillislee. What this means is that theyll be drafting a RB high next year. Id bet money on it. I'd be fine with a RB next year, just not too high. McCoy is not going to last forever.
CanadianFan Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 Assuming we can trade for a RB, who might be available from another team?
Brianmoorman4jesus Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 You do realize we can pursue both, right? It doesn't have to be in any order.I dont even see why one of them is necessary. Shady and Tolbert are fine. You have Jones on the roster and hes usually active. He made some nice plays in preseason. Give him a look.
Boatdrinks Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 Perhaps they can pursue adding another FB to improve the offensive output in 2017.
Formerly Allan in MD Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 Where's Gilleslee when you need him?
GoBills808 Posted October 11, 2017 Posted October 11, 2017 Where's Gilleslee when you need him? In NE contributing 3.6 YPC.
Recommended Posts