Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

CHARLOTTE HAYS: Democratic Rep Suggests that Members of Congress Are Above Ordinary Sexual Conduct Rules.

 

Congress over the years has made itself a privileged class. A quip from Rep. James Clyburn, Democrat from South Carolina, says it all. When asked why, unlike Harvey Weinstein, Matt Lauer, Bill O’Reilly, and Charlie Rose, Rep. John Conyers, the scourge of the elevator, is keeping his job, Clyburn instantly replied, “Who elected them?”

 

Got that?

 

Members of Congress are a protected class, insulated from the consequences of their deeds. There is even secret fund, paid for by us taxpayers, to defray the cost of settlements when our public servants (ha ha) step out of line and harass someone. Our elected officials vote in ObamaCare but are made exempt from having to rely upon ObamaCare themselves.

 

Many Americans aren’t aware of the extent to which Congress has set itself up as a quasi-nobility (without being noble). Voters probably think their elected representatives are struggling with increasing ObamaCare premiums just as they are. Joke’s on us, my fellow taxpayers.

 

I’m not laughing.

 

 

.

Posted
5 minutes ago, B-Man said:

CHARLOTTE HAYS: Democratic Rep Suggests that Members of Congress Are Above Ordinary Sexual Conduct Rules.

 

Congress over the years has made itself a privileged class. A quip from Rep. James Clyburn, Democrat from South Carolina, says it all. When asked why, unlike Harvey Weinstein, Matt Lauer, Bill O’Reilly, and Charlie Rose, Rep. John Conyers, the scourge of the elevator, is keeping his job, Clyburn instantly replied, “Who elected them?”

 

Got that?

 

Members of Congress are a protected class, insulated from the consequences of their deeds. There is even secret fund, paid for by us taxpayers, to defray the cost of settlements when our public servants (ha ha) step out of line and harass someone. Our elected officials vote in ObamaCare but are made exempt from having to rely upon ObamaCare themselves.

 

Many Americans aren’t aware of the extent to which Congress has set itself up as a quasi-nobility (without being noble). Voters probably think their elected representatives are struggling with increasing ObamaCare premiums just as they are. Joke’s on us, my fellow taxpayers.

 

I’m not laughing.

 

 

.

 

That's not new.  If it's not explicitly in the Constitution, it was established principle shortly after.  Congressmen can't be tried for crimes through normal judicial channels while Congress is in session, to prevent abuse of that system by the executive  (e.g., arresting the opposition party on trumped-up charges).

 

And since Congress is always effectively in session these days, they're practically immune from prosecution.

 

For bad behavior not of a criminal nature, of COURSE they can be removed from office.  It's called "an election."  People whining about Congressmen's exemption from ramifications of their actions are the ones setting them up as nobility.

Posted

all government employees are exempt from lawsuits over the work they perform, that's essential to taking on a job that has to tick people off no matter what you do

 

with the addition they can be sued for extreme negligence or criminal behaviour.

 

 

Posted

For the Oscars are they gonna have a Memorial presentation for those careers instantly lost in Hollywood due to sex scandals in 2017

 

Harvey gets the Hammer, still pending though.

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

And... it looks as if Franken is stepping down as of tomorrow. (unconfirmed)

 

Would rather he resign after leaving in handcuffs and criminal charges (not applicable in this matter) or be voted out.

 

 

Posted

Past GOP admins put in judges that were raving liberals, Souter never once went along with GOP lines

 

not this President, baby....

 

The best would be the Dems putting someone on the Supreme Court who turned around and decided like a Scalia from day one...

 

 

 

 

Posted

Holy ****. Did all of these !@#$s graduate from High School? 

 

WTF is wrong with them?!!! 

 

This phenomenon is getting akin to GBID’s “Hot for Teacher” threads. 

Posted
47 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

"...After the New Yorker learned..."

 

How?  That article makes it sound like the acvuser hired an attorney to tell the New Yorker in order to get the guy fired.  I hope that's just because it's a ****ty article.

 

We've definitely hit the point where a jilted girlfriend can thoroughly !@#$ up your life with a vague, anonymous allegation of "inappropriate touching."

Posted
14 minutes ago, Kevbeau said:

Don't think we're there yet, but it definitely feels like this could approach "salem witch trial" territory.

 

Nah, Hillary will never stand trial

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...