HuSeYiN_NYC Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 We are still evaluating and gathering information at this time. Any other questions that I can answer? Yes coach, from the information you've evaluated and gathered, would you say that your offense will be the death of this season?
Heitz Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 I'm having a hard time seeing how our offense will improve with "next man up" philosophy. O'Leary is a downgrade as are all our WRs behind Matthews. What does that even mean? Our starting TE went down, so lets NOT start the next guy in the depth chart? o_O Next man up isn't always about improving, it's about fielding a team...
Sig1Hunter Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 What does that even mean? Our starting TE went down, so lets NOT start the next guy in the depth chart? o_O Next man up isn't always about improving, it's about fielding a team... Its a difficult idea for many to follow, it seems. O'Leary has turned into a decent all around TE, and seems to be improving each week.
Kelly the Dog Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 Confidence in their rookie covering Green = Stupidity in their coaches covering Green = main reason we lost. And I think Tre is great.
HuSeYiN_NYC Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 I'm having a hard time seeing how our offense will improve with "next man up" philosophy. O'Leary is a downgrade as are all our WRs behind Matthews. Don't count O'Leary out like that. The guy is a tough SOB and may not be Clay caliber of a TE, but is a VERY decent #2. Wide receivers I agree with you. A reporter asked McDermott, why would you pay Andre Holmes the most amongst the recievers, yet, he got the 4th most snaps amongst them? McD's answer didn't sit well with me. I'm liking McDermott more and more when i see him on the sidelines during gameday, but the answers he gives to reporters that I personally want a straightforward answer to, he just responds with the typical NFL robotic automated response in press conferences and it irks me.
wppete Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 Im expecting little to no useful information from him as per usual. Very true. A lot of respect the process BS. He cant give a straight answer. He should get into politics.
Gunsgoodtime Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 What about January and February? Healing time
Juice_32 Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 Sounds like Matthews could be back after the bye. That is promising.
26CornerBlitz Posted October 9, 2017 Author Posted October 9, 2017 Sounds like Matthews could be back after the bye. That is promising. That would be most welcomed news.
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 (edited) Confidence in their rookie covering Green = Stupidity in their coaches covering Green = main reason we lost. And I think Tre is great. I think they meant like... instead of having wright/mabin doing it Edited October 9, 2017 by dneveu
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 Healing time ....now booking tee times..............
Bangarang Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 Yes coach, from the information you've evaluated and gathered, would you say that your offense will be the death of this season? I trust the guys we have out there and we are continuing to work at getting better each week. Its a process.
JohnBonhamRocks Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 Agree with those who think O'Leary is not that far of a step down from Clay. He's shown good hands and has really developed in his time here. Plus, says something when this coaching staff has confidence in a guy from before their regime.
26CornerBlitz Posted October 9, 2017 Author Posted October 9, 2017 (edited) Agree with those who think O'Leary is not that far of a step down from Clay. He's shown good hands and has really developed in his time here. Plus, says something when this coaching staff has confidence in a guy from before their regime. O'Leary isn't the blocker that Clay is in the run game nor is he as much of a threat for YAC. He's a nice player, but a downgrade. Edited October 9, 2017 by 26CornerBlitz
Kelly the Dog Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 Agree with those who think O'Leary is not that far of a step down from Clay. He's shown good hands and has really developed in his time here. Plus, says something when this coaching staff has confidence in a guy from before their regime. Getting downfield and yac is a pretty big difference. But I like him. He's just not a #1.
jimmy10 Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 How well O'Leary can fill Clay's shoes isn't even on the first page of my list of worries with this team right now. The kid did pretty good yesterday.
JohnBonhamRocks Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 O'Leary isn't the blocker that Clay is in the run game nor is he as much of a threat for YAC. He's a nice player, but a downgrade. Getting downfield and yac is a pretty big difference. But I like him. He's just not a #1. How well O'Leary can fill Clay's shoes isn't even on the first page of my list of worries with this team right now. The kid did pretty good yesterday. He strikes me as a Mark Campbell type. And to me that's a compliment because that guy was solid and hung onto the ball no matter how hard the hit.
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 Sounds like Matthews could be back after the bye. That is promising. ...depending on the extent and missed time of latest injuries, could even see Streater re-signed after the break or keep Philly Brown in "revolving door status".....poor guy...
Recommended Posts