Rigotz Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 Ill be the first to admit... didnt expect KC to be this good. Sitting are 5-0, one would assume that they will be in the playoffs again, perhaps with a first round Bye. So STRICTLY LOOKING AT PICKS (do not factor in White)... was it a good trade? Bills trade 10th overall pick for: 2017 27th overall pick 2017 3rd round pick 2018 (ESTIMATED) 25th-32nd overall pick
MAJBobby Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 (edited) Do those Picks get you a QB? And i dont really know how you can evalute trades without looking at the players gained from the picks Edited October 9, 2017 by MAJBobby
Game Manager Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 Fleeced, will miss on Watson, Darnold, Rosen and Falk.
Boatdrinks Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 It's a fair deal at best, not a great deal. It meant no Watson which may be a factor to downgrade the trade. It depends what they net out of the pick player wise really. If the Chiefs pick nets them a QB or is part of a package to get a QB then it could be more favorable
MAJBobby Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 They have to. In that case lets for pontificating that out of those picks you get Trey White Mason Rudolph or any long term QB (just using his name because he currently lilely holds a late 1st grade right now) Then yes it is a great trade
Shaw66 Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 The picks isn't the question. The question is the BIlls should have taken Mahomes.
MAJBobby Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 The picks isn't the question. The question is the BIlls should have taken Mahomes. I liked Mahomes alot specially once i knew there was no shot at Trubisky because of his climb.
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 Ill be the first to admit... didnt expect KC to be this good. Sitting are 5-0, one would assume that they will be in the playoffs again, perhaps with a first round Bye. So STRICTLY LOOKING AT PICKS (do not factor in White)... was it a good trade? Bills trade 10th overall pick for: 2017 27th overall pick 2017 3rd round pick 2018 (ESTIMATED) 25th-32nd overall pick Why would you not factor in White? Bills were apparently going CB with their first pick along. Turns out a good one was still available with the later pick. Worked out. I still think it was a good trade despite wherever K.C,'s pick might end up. This of course assumes they did not have an eye at all on Watson or Mahomes. Because if they did and one of those guys turns out to be great then that is a huge miss. Also assuming of course that we don't end up getting our franchise guy in this draft.
GunnerBill Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 The picks isn't the question. The question is the BIlls should have taken Mahomes. Or Watson...
BillsfanAZ Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 of course it was a good trade. They got a great CB and an extra first round pick. Who cares if the Chiefs win the superbowl. They will have 2 picks in the top 32. 6 picks in the the first three rounds as well as they should have some money under the cap next season if they need free agents.
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 It's a fair deal at best, not a great deal. It meant no Watson which may be a factor to downgrade the trade. It depends what they net out of the pick player wise really. If the Chiefs pick nets them a QB or is part of a package to get a QB then it could be more favorable You only downgrade it if we were really considering Watson. I don't believe that was the case.
MAJBobby Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 The only real issue i see is QBs are going to go early in the upcoming draft. So many teams need them going into next year.
purple haze Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 Fleeced, will miss on Watson, Darnold, Rosen and Falk. Who said Darnold, Rosen or Falk will be any good? There are no guarantees.
GunnerBill Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 You only downgrade it if we were really considering Watson. I don't believe that was the case. I don't think they were either. But they should have been.
MAJBobby Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 And if the Chiefs continue like this i dont see anyway possible for them moving Alex Smith to one of the QB needy teams prior to the draft so that hurts as well.
BillsfanAZ Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 The picks isn't the question. The question is the BIlls should have taken Mahomes. Mahomes playing with the chiefs is a lot different than Mahomes or Watson playing with the Bills. The Bills collected picks in next years draft because they are lacking talent and depth. The Bills have a decent defense but are lacking offensive talent.
bbb Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 This is just the same crap the Islanders pulled on us a few years ago!
OhDozeBills Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 Another huge draft miss for a QB by the Bills. Yeah, I love T White and he was a great pick, but QB is far and above the most important position in football. I have a feeling this years QB class will be better than next year. I'm not sold on any current college QB to be a slam dunk franchise QB
Recommended Posts