Magox Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 What am I looking at? Fuzzy blotches? Which WR are you saying was open (allegedly?) You're right Promo. No one was open and he was justified to take the sack.
RyanC883 Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 no one is every "wide-open" in the NFL. TT only seems to throw the ball on the rare occassion when someone is "wide-open." With our running game in shambles due to the new blocking "scheme," this offense is terrible. Hopefully we draft a QB, WR, OL, and FIRE DENNISON.
Lurker Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 (edited) TT only seems to throw the ball on the rare occassion when someone is "wide-open." Yep. Good thing Tate was so wide open on that TD toss. Must have been a dropped coverage... Seriously, the thing that did stand out on the Tate throw was that TT had a throwing lane. And all his sacks / hold the ball misses came when he didn't. The Bengals had a great game plan for him. Run the outside rush wide to keep him penned in the pocket and clog the inside up so he can't see as well. We will likely see more of this now that game film is available... Edited October 9, 2017 by Lurker
Magox Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 Yep. Good thing Tate was so wide open on that TD toss. Must have been a dropped coverage... Good point. Now we can check off that TT did indeed throw to someone effectively who wasn't "wide open" in the game and now use it as a blanket excuse to cover him for all the rest of the times that he didn't.
Lurker Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 Good point. Now we can check off that TT did indeed throw to someone effectively who wasn't "wide open" in the game and now use it as a blanket excuse to cover him for all the rest of the times that he didn't. See "throwing lane" above.....
leonbus23 Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 I see this also. Is he with David Blaine now ? Chris Angel mind freak.
PromoTheRobot Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 You're right Promo. No one was open and he was justified to take the sack. That photo is not clear enough to know who was open. You don't have to act like my wife because I don't agree with you.
Magox Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 That photo is not clear enough to know who was open. You don't have to act like my wife because I don't agree with you. No, you're right. He shouldn't have thrown it, it's not clear who was open. The sack was justified.
Figster Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 That photo is not clear enough to know who was open. You don't have to act like my wife because I don't agree with you.
BillsFan130 Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 That photo is not clear enough to know who was open. You don't have to act like my wife because I don't agree with you I don't think he was wide open, but I think he has to step up and take a shot at that. Especially under the circumstances late in the game trailing
billsfan60 Posted October 9, 2017 Posted October 9, 2017 I don't think he was wide open, but I think he has to step up and take a shot at that. Especially under the circumstances late in the game trailing For this to happen taylor has to mentally shift gears before the series starts. He can't do that. He has proven over and over he has one way to play the game and it doesn't include the ability to take a chance on either his or the receiver's ability to make a play when the odds on success are long. There is no gambler in taylor. He's hit his ceiling ...HARD and the team is paying for it.
Recommended Posts