K D Posted October 12, 2017 Posted October 12, 2017 we are 1 hit away from the Peterman era. Tyrod hurt his chest that one play last game. i thought we might finally get some offense going
Wayne Arnold Posted October 12, 2017 Posted October 12, 2017 Taylor absolutely does cover up for the OL's inability to provide adequate time to throw, while in some other instances Tyrod holds the ball too long. Both things are true beyond the biased agenda of posters like you. Spare me the "agenda" garbage. Once in a while Taylor can get out of a sack no other quarterback can. But we're more likely to see Taylor sacked because he held the ball too long than we are to see Taylor contort his body and use his athleticism to avoid a sack.
26CornerBlitz Posted October 12, 2017 Posted October 12, 2017 Spare me the "agenda" garbage. Once in a while Taylor can get out of a sack no other quarterback can. But we're more likely to see Taylor sacked because he held the ball too long than we are to see Taylor contort his body and use his athleticism to avoid a sack. Based on your recall or do you have numbers to back this up?
Wayne Arnold Posted October 12, 2017 Posted October 12, 2017 (edited) Based on your recall or do you have numbers to back this up? Well just last game alone he was sacked six times. Did he have six amazing plays where he avoided a sack that no one else could avoid? Edited October 12, 2017 by Wayne Arnold
26CornerBlitz Posted October 12, 2017 Posted October 12, 2017 (edited) Well just last game alone he was sacked six times. Did he have six amazing plays where he avoided a sack that no one else could avoid? We know the Bengals' game was a bad performance, but one game does not tell the story for the entire season. Where's the statistical evidence to back up your general assertion? Edited October 12, 2017 by 26CornerBlitz
Bangarang Posted October 12, 2017 Posted October 12, 2017 We know the Bengals' game was a bad performance, but one game does not tell the story for the entire season. Where's the statistical evidence to back up your general assertion? Are you just being difficult on purpose? Youve watched the games the last few years right? Do you really need a stat to tell you what you should already know?
Wayne Arnold Posted October 12, 2017 Posted October 12, 2017 We know the Bengals' game was a bad performance, but one game does not tell the story for the entire season. Where's the statistical evidence to back up your general assertion? It's a hypothesis that's very easy to come to if you watch the games. Perhaps you should provide statistical evidence to refute it.
26CornerBlitz Posted October 12, 2017 Posted October 12, 2017 It's a hypothesis that's very easy to come to if you watch the games. Perhaps you should provide statistical evidence to refute it. It's not my assertion. Why should I have to do work to disprove what you claim as fact?
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted October 12, 2017 Posted October 12, 2017 Are you just being difficult on purpose? Youve watched the games the last few years right? Do you really need a stat to tell you what you should already know? did you really have to ask that question?
hemma Posted October 12, 2017 Posted October 12, 2017 Last year Taylor gained 6.1 yards per rush. This year = 3.8. Taylor's advantage is ..... what?
BeginnersMind Posted October 12, 2017 Posted October 12, 2017 we are 1 hit away from the Peterman era. Tyrod hurt his chest that one play last game. i thought we might finally get some offense going We are one hit away from Peterman playing. There is no indication that it will be the start of any era.
xRUSHx Posted October 12, 2017 Posted October 12, 2017 (edited) We are one hit away from Peterman playing. There is no indication that it will be the start of any era. What is sad is many will be thinking the same thing wanting Tyrod to get hurt and that's not good, I never wish a player to get hurt, well unless it's Brady of course.haha Edited October 12, 2017 by xRUSHx
K D Posted October 12, 2017 Posted October 12, 2017 We are one hit away from Peterman playing. There is no indication that it will be the start of any era. It's the start of Tyrod not starting so that's something
26CornerBlitz Posted October 12, 2017 Posted October 12, 2017 @BuffRumblings Our @YardsPerPass makes the case to the #Bills to start Nathan Peterman. Click it and read. https://www.buffalorumblings.com/2017/10/12/16464060/analysis-buffalo-bills-start-nathan-peterman-bench-tyrod-taylor-west-coast-offense-rick-dennison Nate Geary wrote an excellent article for WGR 550 about why Tyrod Taylor should remain the starter for the Buffalo Bills and for the most part I do agree with it. I think Taylor should remain the starter, so please remember that while reading I understand this is a very one-sided piece. Then I started thinking about the offense in general. Would it be more successful with Peterman at quarterback? Which led me to channel my inner hot-takes and make the case for Nate Peterman at quarterback.
26CornerBlitz Posted October 12, 2017 Posted October 12, 2017 @JoeBuscaglia New #BillsBeat! @MatthewFairburn & I answer all of your Qs, including why Tyrod isn't getting benched. Listen here: https://soundcloud.com/billsjoeb/bye-week-qa-your-questions-answered
26CornerBlitz Posted October 13, 2017 Posted October 13, 2017 @JoeBuscaglia Is Tyrod Taylor good enough to get the #Bills to the playoffs? Full analysis, plus I think I nailed how we got here: http://www.wkbw.com/sports/bills/7-buffalo-bills-questions-for-the-bye-2-can-tyrod-taylor-lead-the-bills-to-the-playoffs-in-2017- If you’re clamoring for Nathan Peterman to replace Tyrod Taylor anytime soon? You’re going to have to deal with it, because that’s not happening as long as the playoffs are alive in their minds, and as long as Taylor continues ‘the constant’ of his play. Like it or not Taylor gives the Bills the best chance to win this season, and that is clearly not going to be something that head coach Sean McDermott sacrifices as the Bills continue on in 2017. He wants to give it his best shot at making the playoffs this year with the players that they have, to help establish an identity within the locker room down the road, and as to not punt on the season completely which could allow for some bad habits to form within the organization. While Peterman is the shiny new toy, his weaknesses are more desirable to some because we just don’t know them yet. Or, fans are eager to see what they have in him before the 2018 NFL Draft, to try and decide how aggressive the team should be to find one in April. However, Peterman really wasn’t extraordinary during the preseason and didn’t show enough to be trusted so early in his NFL career -- at least not by my eyes.
ndirish1978 Posted October 13, 2017 Posted October 13, 2017 I'm confident the OP is unbiased in his opinion here based solely on his screen name
26CornerBlitz Posted October 13, 2017 Posted October 13, 2017 I'm confident the OP is unbiased in his opinion here based solely on his screen name Definitely one of the most ardent Petermaniacs.
Bangarang Posted October 13, 2017 Posted October 13, 2017 The Tyrod damage control team is going to be putting in lots of overtime this year.
Recommended Posts