HuSeYiN_NYC Posted October 8, 2017 Posted October 8, 2017 Banyard on the 53 man roster for what? They never dress him... he is a better back to replace McCoy rather than big boy Tolbert. Stuff like that just pisses me off.
CanadianFan Posted October 8, 2017 Posted October 8, 2017 So, this is a close one. Without offensive weapons, this is how we're going to lose all year. Couldn't make plays when we had so many turnovers. This kind of loss is on Beane. That's why it is a half tank. The defense failed us on the last two drives by Cincinnati. The supposed strength of our team got outmuscled by a weak Bengals offensive line. Emotionally and mentally they did not get up for the Bengals. That's how you get out played physically. That's on McDermott. McDermott couldn't prepare his team to get up mentally and emotionally to face and beat a beatable Bengals team. Whereas a Belicheat would have. That's the difference between good coaching and great coaching. It isn't just X and Os.
Kirby Jackson Posted October 8, 2017 Posted October 8, 2017 Oh I know. The relationship was shot. It was the organizations own doing though. They hired Rex, they created the problem with their young WR. The player development within the organization has been bad. Don't disagree but that's what it is.
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted October 8, 2017 Posted October 8, 2017 (edited) ...stack the box, take away McCoy and dare TT to throw.....ABC's of football and it worked PERIOD......and AJ torched the D for 189 as good measure............... Edited October 8, 2017 by OldTimeAFLGuy
ajgoff1286 Posted October 8, 2017 Posted October 8, 2017 The Bengals moved the ball up and down the field all day. The 3 turnovers were lucky bounces that went our way. Pathetic that you have +3 turnover differential and still manage to have to try for a last minute drive to win. Pathetic effort by Taylor Dennison and the entire offense
downunderbill Posted October 8, 2017 Posted October 8, 2017 ...and AJ with 189 didn't have a damn thing to do with the L.....got it........... AJ's 3 turnovers should help with a W though.
Wayne Cubed Posted October 8, 2017 Posted October 8, 2017 Don't disagree but that's what it is. Its the only thing it could be. Still dont agree with it. If the Pegulas dont hire Rex is Watkins still with the Bills?
CircleTheWagons99 Posted October 8, 2017 Posted October 8, 2017 So, this is a close one. Without offensive weapons, this is how we're going to lose all year. Couldn't make plays when we had so many turnovers. This kind of loss is on Beane. That's why it is a half tank. The defense failed us on the last two drives by Cincinnati. The supposed strength of our team got outmuscled by a weak Bengals offensive line. Emotionally and mentally they did not get up for the Bengals. That's how you get out played physically. That's on McDermott. McDermott couldn't prepare his team to get up mentally and emotionally to face and beat a beatable Bengals team. Whereas a Belicheat would have. That's the difference between good coaching and great coaching. It isn't just X and Os. Brady won a superbowl throwing to a CB. You make due with what you have. Tyrod cannot throw an easly catchable pass. You need SUPERSTARS to catch his passes.
NoSaint Posted October 8, 2017 Posted October 8, 2017 ...and AJ with 189 didn't have a damn thing to do with the L.....got it........... Yea, we need to keep pace with modern NFL offenses at some point. Expecting us to hold everyone to 13 is unrealistic
Kirby Jackson Posted October 8, 2017 Posted October 8, 2017 Its the only thing it could be. Still dont agree with it. If the Pegulas dont hire Rex is Watkins still with the Bills?I don't know but there are some issues with Sammy (and you know I loved him). The reality is it still may have been a no. Our offensive talent is just not good.
Wayne Cubed Posted October 8, 2017 Posted October 8, 2017 I don't know but there are some issues with Sammy (and you know I loved him). The reality is it still may have been a no. I know about the other issues and yea it could have been a no still but if the player development of the organization is better, maybe that changes things. Look at Dareus. Now Watkins.
TheFunPolice Posted October 8, 2017 Posted October 8, 2017 I don't get why people are mad at Tyrod This was his typical stat line, minus the INT
Kirby Jackson Posted October 8, 2017 Posted October 8, 2017 Listening to the Cowboys radio now in the Uber and they just made a lot of sense. "Bottom line you've got to get to 10 wins to give yourself a chance to get into the playoffs." The Bills need to find 7 wins vs. 4 losses. Can they do it? I don't know
Nitro Posted October 8, 2017 Posted October 8, 2017 What does a McCoy run have to do with Tyrod? Evaluate Tyrod on things Tyrod does, not others. you put all the blame on him. I was pointing out the flaws in your argument. The man has few weapons today to throw to.
Recommended Posts