klos63 Posted October 8, 2017 Author Share Posted October 8, 2017 yes, that's exactly it. Making fun of the WaPo sports article is exactly the same. I'd make fun of LA Times covering the sabres. Or any such thing. Other than the Dareus mention, what issues did you have with the article? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Other than the Dareus mention, what issues did you have with the article?oh this is not going to end pretty for you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klos63 Posted October 8, 2017 Author Share Posted October 8, 2017 yes, that's exactly it. Making fun of the WaPo sports article is exactly the same. I'd make fun of LA Times covering the sabres. Or any such thing. Why, because LA has only had an NHL team for 50 years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Well, the Post does blow. Particularly their football coverage. But then, that's not surprising when you cover the Redskins. True dat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Formerly Allan in MD Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Kiss of death? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Marcel.dareus and the bills have been dominant. Not accurate nor supported in the argument. Nothing shows our DL is dominant, in fact in that article. However they mentioned Madden stats. That's for a 7th grader. They're the only ones who care. Further it begins to go all over the place in a drunken driving type mess talking about what we are doing on defense - no real anything. Just player x was x and we need y. Further we didn't trade Watkins for Gaines This is essentially a football 101 article. There is nothing good about it unless you just want to feel good about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klos63 Posted October 8, 2017 Author Share Posted October 8, 2017 oh this is not going to end pretty for you grow up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 Why, because LA has only had an NHL team for 50 years?because it is a city that doesn't need to thoroughly cover the Sabres or provide quality content. WaPo needs something their low digit readers to digest to have conversation with actual men when they leave the beltway in an effort to sound more masculine. grow updon't ask me to answer a question without the prep h because when I bring it I am not gentle and will be a sore that drives you nuts. Just remember it's not fun to provoke me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klos63 Posted October 8, 2017 Author Share Posted October 8, 2017 because it is a city that doesn't need to thoroughly cover the Sabres or provide quality content. WaPo needs something their low digit readers to digest to have conversation with actual men when they leave the beltway in an effort to sound more masculine. don't ask me to answer a question without the prep h because when I bring it I am not gentle and will be a sore that drives you nuts. Just remember it's not fun to provoke me. You come off as a miserable human being in pretty much every thread in which I see your posts. I posted a complimentary article on the Bills, you don't have to like it. Next time, just STFU and pass it by. It's not that it's no fun to provoke you, it's no fun to interact with you at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 You come off as a miserable human being in pretty much every thread in which I see your posts. I posted a complimentary article on the Bills, you don't have to like it. Next time, just STFU and pass it by. It's not that it's no fun to provoke you, it's no fun to interact with you at all.wow,you're really sensetive to go with a personal attack. What's wrong? This is why it won't end well, because now you're sad. And now you to tell me to STFU and ignore an article you posted that I disagreed with where you provoked a response on why I didn't like it and when I didn't like it you got #feelings upset. So, if you weren't prepared for your earth being shattered to why the article wasn't that amazing than why did you ask? I did warn you. I'm sorry #feelings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klos63 Posted October 8, 2017 Author Share Posted October 8, 2017 (edited) wow,you're really sensetive to go with a personal attack. What's wrong? This is why it won't end well, because now you're sad. And now you to tell me to STFU and ignore an article you posted that I disagreed with where you provoked a response on why I didn't like it and when I didn't like it you got #feelings upset. So, if you weren't prepared for your earth being shattered to why the article wasn't that amazing than why did you ask? I did warn you. I'm sorry #feelings My earth isn't shattered, i didn't assume the article was 'amazing' . I'm not upset. I think after reading your posts over time that I just find you to be a miserable person who thinks way too highly of himself and wanted to point that out. No need too apologize, you're not significant enough to matter. Edited October 8, 2017 by klos63 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted October 8, 2017 Share Posted October 8, 2017 My earth isn't shattered, i didn't assume the article was 'amazing' . I'm not upset. I think after reading your posts over time that I just find you to be a miserable person who thinks way too highly of himself and wanted to point that out. No need too apologize, you're not significant enough to matter.can we get back to talking about football instead of your feelings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts