Kmart128 Posted October 5, 2017 Posted October 5, 2017 Over Antonio and Julio?! I would personally take Brown because he is better but i see where he is coming from as Tyreek Hill does fit what we need better. We need speed in the worst way at the reciever position and he comes from a game management offense a lot like we are trying to do here.
Charlottebillsfan2 Posted October 5, 2017 Posted October 5, 2017 You put Rodgers on this team and we are talking about a first round bye, home filed advantage, and a possible Superbowl win. So yeah I'm going with Rodgers.
Mat68 Posted October 5, 2017 Posted October 5, 2017 Odell Beckham. One of the most dynamic players with the ball in hands I have seen.
Watkins101 Posted October 5, 2017 Posted October 5, 2017 Non-Qb-Antonio Brown. Amazing reciever, and has better health than Julio.
Tommy Posted October 5, 2017 Posted October 5, 2017 I think Russell Wilson would be a strong consideration, considering what he does with what might be the worst OL in the league. Rodgers and Brady would also be great picks. If we went WR, I think you'd want someone with elite separation like Antonio Brown, given Tyrod's tendency to only throw to guys who are already open (vice throwing jump balls and risking an interception). For defense, Aaron Donald is the most dominant player on that side of the ball, in my opinion.
BuffaloBillyG Posted October 5, 2017 Posted October 5, 2017 Over Antonio and Julio?! Yes. I'm building a team...lol. In all seriousness, Antonio and Julio are amazing. Both would be in the talk for top 20 all time WR list. But for me I love the fit Hill would have here as well as his explosive play style being fun to watch. Besides for these type threads it's easy to pick a All Pro regardless of fit. Torn between CJ Ah You and Mansfield Wrotto You don't love the Wang? Ed Wang in this offense would be amazing.
BfloBillsFan Posted October 5, 2017 Posted October 5, 2017 The best in the game is the one and only Aaron Rodgers. https://www.pro-foot.../R/RodgAa00.htm Totally agree. Brady can read the D well and has a quick release. Aaron does both and will can make more plays on his own.
The Jokeman Posted October 5, 2017 Posted October 5, 2017 I'll pry get flamed for saying this, but I would take Brady over Rodgers, but then drown myself. Rodgers is nowhere near the same QB without Nelson. Brady does it with anyone. Yet looking at age etc. Rodgers would be with the team longer.
GoBills808 Posted October 5, 2017 Posted October 5, 2017 I'll pry get flamed for saying this, but I would take Brady over Rodgers, but then drown myself. Rodgers is nowhere near the same QB without Nelson. Brady does it with anyone. Yikes.
JohnBonhamRocks Posted October 5, 2017 Posted October 5, 2017 Rodgers. Not sure if that's because of age or my hatred for Brady, honestly. Non-QB: Antonio Brown.
hondo in seattle Posted October 5, 2017 Posted October 5, 2017 Sammy Watkins which would=playoffs. A Rogers would get killed with Bills OL. This is my thought when anyone mentions a non-mobile QB. If I could pick three instead of one, Jordan Mills would be sent to the bench by someone.
GoBills808 Posted October 5, 2017 Posted October 5, 2017 This is my thought when anyone mentions a non-mobile QB. If I could pick three instead of one, Jordan Mills would be sent to the bench by someone. Have you seen the Packers offensive line? They are hands down worse than ours and it's not close IMO.
Recommended Posts