SaviorPeterman Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 I still think this is misleading, if anything because of Taylor running around buying himself time but it's worth noting:
BillnutinHouston Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 Agree with your take. On the flip side, it's good to see the Pats* NOT there.
K D Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 Agree with your take. On the flip side, it's good to see the Pats* NOT there. They said Brady on pace to be sacked 52 times. Fingers crossed!
Pbomb Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 They said Brady on pace to be sacked 52 times. Fingers crossed!that will start to wear on the old man nicely
CDogg20 Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 (edited) Might be because we hardly pass and use roll outs when we do so I agree Edited October 4, 2017 by CDogg20
GunnerBill Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 sounds like good scheming to me O-Line play is always about scheming to a greater extent than almost any other unit on the field because it is imperative that the line works as a unit. I feel like the pass block scheming has been better and the run block scheming has been worse. Worried about John Miller. I have been a fan of his right back to his rookier year where I thought he played better than his PFF grade or the general narrative. He is really struggling in this scheme. I think he really struggles with the agility needed to move laterally on those stretch runs and it is noticeable that when the Bills have mixed in the odd dose of a more north to south blocking scheme Miller has looked much more comfortable. But the stretch zone is a staple of their offense and we have a guard (and a center actually) really struggling to execute it.
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted October 4, 2017 Posted October 4, 2017 (edited) They said Brady on pace to be sacked 52 times. Fingers crossed! while true .... TT's not that far off @ 48 Taylors more resilient Edited October 4, 2017 by ShadyBillsFan
Recommended Posts