Kmart128 Posted September 28, 2017 Posted September 28, 2017 Nop, it was the same as the Sanders Catch / no Catch... he didn´t complete the catch as he felt down and lost the ball. For me it was a good no challenge. But what I like to see there is the referees call the TD so it would have to be reviewed. I think all controversial calls in the end zone should be given the proper review, not just scoring plays. I disagree. Tolbert made a football move towards the goalline before falling down so i think it would have been called a catch and TD. Or a catch, fumble and touchback for Broncos depending on when the ball came out. The difference between Sanders and Tolberts catches is that Tolbert made a football move before going to the ground while Sanders never made such move.
CanadianFan Posted September 28, 2017 Posted September 28, 2017 fatboy clearly wiped out before getting to the endzone. imagine when we have ice and snow. how's he so fat and still be called "professional" I don't know.
NewMexBills Posted September 28, 2017 Posted September 28, 2017 Play should have been challenged...Move on
PromoTheRobot Posted September 28, 2017 Posted September 28, 2017 Play should have been challenged...Move on I'm gonna have to disagree with you on that one. Especially when you consider how important that potential lost time out would have been on the FG drive at the end of the first half. We know how refs call these things. Crossing the goal line on pass plays means nothing if you don't hang on to the ball.
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 You have to complete the process of the catch. He didn't. Would have stood because it was the correct call. His "football move" was dropping the pass
NewEra Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 No challenge. Well played. We all should know that wouldn't have been overturned into a TD.
Recommended Posts