Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 913
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Thanks sounds like a good idea. Their intentions are clear. Surely not to converse rather to troll at a cyclic rate and insult at a much higher rate. Thanks Boyst

no, their intention is to just have a little bit of fun. Many people including those nimrods are tired of this whole matter so interjecting humor into it is entertaining. Tom doesn't have much to occupy his time so he stays here, in Kelly it's kind of that special guy we all appreciate and we just laugh with because we know he was always picked last in gym class
Posted

no, their intention is to just have a little bit of fun. Many people including those nimrods are tired of this whole matter so interjecting humor into it is entertaining. Tom doesn't have much to occupy his time so he stays here, in Kelly it's kind of that special guy we all appreciate and we just laugh with because we know he was always picked last in gym class

Exactly. That dude you just responded to jumped me from behind. I don't even know who he is and he just took a random post of mine and started attacking me. Look it up.

 

Granted, it was gibberish and neither Tom, who is a certified madman AND genius, couldn't make hide nor harebrain out of what he said, but I know it was nasty. So I responded in unkind. And then he gets upset. And finds solace in YOU. 😂😂

Posted

Exactly. That dude you just responded to jumped me from behind. I don't even know who he is and he just took a random post of mine and started attacking me. Look it up.

 

Granted, it was gibberish and neither Tom, who is a certified madman AND genius, couldn't make hide nor harebrain out of what he said, but I know it was nasty. So I responded in unkind. And then he gets upset. And finds solace in YOU. 😂😂

you wrote a lot, I didn't read it. But the Emojis are kind of cool. Thank you
Posted

Exactly. That dude you just responded to jumped me from behind. I don't even know who he is and he just took a random post of mine and started attacking me. Look it up.

 

Granted, it was gibberish and neither Tom, who is a certified madman AND genius, couldn't make hide nor harebrain out of what he said, but I know it was nasty. So I responded in unkind. And then he gets upset. And finds solace in YOU. 😂😂

Not true two letters one in each word of the first sentence. You are about as bad as a liar as you are as a poster. But continue on. I like it when people dont hide behind a facade.
Posted (edited)

Not true two letters one in each word of the first sentence. You are about as bad as a liar as you are as a poster. But continue on. I like it when people dont hide behind a facade.

I don't care. Im glad at least you admit it was a totally unprovoked ambush. Which is fine if you actually had anything to say. But in about ten posts directed mine or Tom's way, you have yet to make any cogent point whatsoever, except "wah, wah, wah, you are bad" - which now that I think of it, isn't a cogent point at all. Carry on with your gibberish. Edited by Kelly the Dog
Posted

I'm too good at this, it never ends pretty.

 

A dedication to me from you

 

Get out of here with this kitty rock ballad crap. Is this what you play when you fist those cows?? I pegged you as more of a Depeche Mode kind of guy.

Posted

 

Get out of here with this kitty rock ballad crap. Is this what you play when you fist those cows?? I pegged you as more of a Depeche Mode kind of guy.

Que

Posted

Well, he did want 2% of the team from the Pegula's......

Then Pegula's lawyers briefed him on the POS he was stiffing many during his bankruptcy. And all of a sudden he is a huge liability to the brand.

Ownership, Thought about it and decided he would be best as a stage prop on the sidelines during home games.

 

Glad he turned his life around but many in Buffalo don't forget.

Posted

I posted this Luke Bryan video because I think he's cute.

 

This guy is, arguably, the worst singer on God's Flat Earth. But I'm glad you think he's hot.

Posted

16 jumbo shrimp (12 per pound, about 1 1/2 pounds), with heads and unpeeled

1/2 cup Worcestershire sauce

2 tablespoons fresh lemon juice (about 2 lemons)

2 teaspoons ground black pepper

2 teaspoons cracked black pepper

2 teaspoons Creole seasoning

1 teaspoon minced garlic

1 1/2 cups (3 sticks) cold unsalted butter, cubed

French bread as accompaniment

 

In a large skillet combine shrimp, Worcestershire, lemon juice, black peppers, Creole seasoning, and garlic and cook over moderately high heat until shrimp turn pink, about 1 minute on each side. Reduce heat to moderate and stir in butter, a few cubes at a time, stirring constantly and adding more only when butter is melted. Remove skillet from heat. Place shrimp in a bowl and pour sauce over top. Serve with French bread for dipping.

Posted

 

This guy is, arguably, the worst singer on God's Flat Earth. But I'm glad you think he's hot.

I'll raise your flat earth and see you flat earf

Posted

 

No, it is not.

 

The policy uses both words, with clear distinction between the two.

 

Should is a suggestion.

 

Must is a mandate.

 

It's really that simple.

He was right

 

should is about as definitive as must.

and again - No one is protesting the Flag or against the military.

 

They are making a protest while the anthem is being played. It's got peoples attention ergo Winning.

In corporate terms

Shall - Work Task that Must be done

May - Work Task that Could be done

Posted

He was right

 

should is about as definitive as must.

 

and again - No one is protesting the Flag or against the military.

 

They are making a protest while the anthem is being played. It's got peoples attention ergo Winning.

 

In corporate terms

Shall - Work Task that Must be done

May - Work Task that Could be done

if gugny would to otherwise understand this

 

https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/plain_language/articles/mandatory/

Posted

He was right

 

should is about as definitive as must.

and again - No one is protesting the Flag or against the military.

 

They are making a protest while the anthem is being played. It's got peoples attention ergo Winning.

In corporate terms

Shall - Work Task that Must be done

May - Work Task that Could be done

 

Here's your NFL Corporate Statement:

Twenty years ago, the NBA suspended a player who refused to stand for the national anthem. The NFL will not be doing the same thing.

“Players are encouraged but not required to stand during the playing of the National Anthem,” the NFL said in a statement issued Saturday, in response to the controversy that emerged when 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick opted not to stand during the playing of the national anthem on Friday night in Santa Clara, prior to a game against the Packers.

 

http://profootballta...ational-anthem/

Posted (edited)

 

Here's your NFL Corporate Statement:

http://profootballta...ational-anthem/

maybe in Twitterland or basements does NFL trump US Code, but not in the real world.

Ctrl V summore

 

Not to mention you failed egregiously to capture the point being made. Disirregardless of the NFLs policy we were discussing the fact that it is law.

 

Please, let the adults converse if you can't keep up.

Edited by Boyst62
Posted

maybe in Twitterland or basements does NFL trump US Code, but not in the real world.

Ctrl V summore

 

Not to mention you failed egregiously to capture the point being made. Disirregardless of the NFLs policy we were discussing the fact that it is law.

 

Please, let the adults converse if you can't keep up.

Two points.

 

I appreciate all the links 26 provides, makes it easy for me to find stuff. Name calling is just silly and juvenile, and you talking about adults

 

and WTF is this "Disirregardless "

Posted

He was right

 

should is about as definitive as must.

and again - No one is protesting the Flag or against the military.

 

They are making a protest while the anthem is being played. It's got peoples attention ergo Winning.

In corporate terms

Shall - Work Task that Must be done

May - Work Task that Could be done

 

 

This is an interesting argument you all make. Looking at the words individually I can see how you could conclude that "shall" could mean "must". However I think you need to look at the context in which the word appears. The rule states that the National Anthem "must" be played and that players "must" be on the side lines. Why then would the legislator not continue to use the word "must" when referring to standing. In my opinion the change here from "must" to "shall" is deliberate. If I was writing the legislation and I wanted to make standing during the Anthem mandatory, I would have simply continued to use the word "must". I would imagine when writing rules every word is closely scrutinised as the author would be aware of the potential challenges somewhere down the line.

 

I therefore would conclude that "shall" does not not carry the same weight as "must" in this context.

 

This is of course only my opinion and I fully accept that there will be many who disagree with it.

Posted

 

 

This is an interesting argument you all make. Looking at the words individually I can see how you could conclude that "shall" could mean "must". However I think you need to look at the context in which the word appears. The rule states that the National Anthem "must" be played and that players "must" be on the side lines. Why then would the legislator not continue to use the word "must" when referring to standing. In my opinion the change here from "must" to "shall" is deliberate. If I was writing the legislation and I wanted to make standing during the Anthem mandatory, I would have simply continued to use the word "must". I would imagine when writing rules every word is closely scrutinised as the author would be aware of the potential challenges somewhere down the line.

 

I therefore would conclude that "shall" does not not carry the same weight as "must" in this context.

 

This is of course only my opinion and I fully accept that there will be many who disagree with it.

you're comparing 3 different articles.

 

The US Code was written long ago and SCOTUS has had to weigh in that Shall had different meaning at an earlier historical point whereas shall is now regarded by legal eagles to mean without obligation.

 

The rule stating the players must stand is an NFL corporate rule, essentially which is independent of the entire legal code which was discussed

Two points.

 

I appreciate all the links 26 provides, makes it easy for me to find stuff. Name calling is just silly and juvenile, and you talking about adults

 

and WTF is this "Disirregardless "

disirregardless has been around for at least 2 years meow

 

And it's not calling him names. It is calling him out that he fails to respond to the most basic arguments set against him then cherry picks replies which he can essentially provide a higher ground rebuttal that actually falls short of any actual argument or ability to be engaged due to lack of critical thought.

Posted

16 jumbo shrimp (12 per pound, about 1 1/2 pounds), with heads and unpeeled

1/2 cup Worcestershire sauce

2 tablespoons fresh lemon juice (about 2 lemons)

2 teaspoons ground black pepper

2 teaspoons cracked black pepper

2 teaspoons Creole seasoning

1 teaspoon minced garlic

1 1/2 cups (3 sticks) cold unsalted butter, cubed

French bread as accompaniment

 

In a large skillet combine shrimp, Worcestershire, lemon juice, black peppers, Creole seasoning, and garlic and cook over moderately high heat until shrimp turn pink, about 1 minute on each side. Reduce heat to moderate and stir in butter, a few cubes at a time, stirring constantly and adding more only when butter is melted. Remove skillet from heat. Place shrimp in a bowl and pour sauce over top. Serve with French bread for dipping.

I'm saving this. anything that recommends three sticks of butter is doing something right.

×
×
  • Create New...